Failures

Failures

by Mike Masnick




How To Lose The WiFi Market: Forget That Competition Exists

from the um.-competition? dept

Agere, a spinoff of Lucent (itself a spinoff of AT&T), helped define and create the WiFi market, but now holds a fairly small portion of the market, and is the number five seller of WiFi chips. In taking a look at how Agere "lost" the WiFi market, it simply appears that they weren't ready for competition from plenty of other companies -- including a company with a lot more money: Intel. While the article makes some suggestions (confusion after spinning off their WiFi product business to focus on just chips, taking their eye off the ball to focus on not going bankrupt), the more realistic explanation simply seems to be that they didn't expect as much competition in the marketplace as they received. If anything, it sounds like, by "inventing" the market, they expected to keep it forever. They also seem particularly miffed at Intel's marketing campaign to co-opt WiFi into their Centrino brand -- leading many people to believe that Intel created WiFi. When you're blaming your competitor's ability to outmarket you as the reason you lost a market (especially when it's an emerging market), it suggests the company simply wasn't prepared to compete at all.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Aug 27th, 2004 @ 8:14am
  • Agere

    by Mike

    Well said. We are the competion in our business! WDY

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Oct 25th, 2008 @ 10:02am
  • Intel doesn't care much about compatibility, either

    by Brett Glass

    It's worse than that.... Intel is doing more than engaging in revisionist history; it's also failing to comply with the standard. At this date, Intel still has not fixed the incompatibilities between its Centrino line and Wi-Fi access points based on the venerable Intersil Prism chipsets. Millions upon millions of Wi-Fi access points use this chipset, including several by D-Link as well as the venerable Senao CB3+ Deluxe.

    We are an ISP, and serve some apartment complexes and coffeehouses that have Wi-Fi hotspots and access points. As we have learned after many tech support calls from frustrated users, if you have a Centrino laptop, you will likely find that you cannot use many Wi-Fi hotspots.

    Our users have reported these problems again and again to Intel, as has my wireless ISP. But Intel's tech support apparently is set up to assume that any and al problems will be the fault of the user; they're just plain not equipped to receive reports of an actual bug in their product! When we've tried to get the issue esclated, we're told that we should call the manufacturer of the laptop that's having the problem and have them complain to Intel. But our company doesn't own any Centrino-based laptops (for this very reason), so this is nothing but a runaround.

    As a result, our ISP can only warn users that if they buy a Centrino-based laptop, they'll probably have to keep a separate Wi-Fi adapter (a PCMCIA card or a USB Wi-Fi adapter) handy if they want to be sure to connect. In my opinion, Intel should not be allowed to call its Centrino chips "Wi-Fi" until they fix this frustrating incompatibility.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It