RSS
Twitter
Perhaps Newspapers Should Stop Looking Back, And Start Looking Forward
from the just-a-suggestion dept
For all the reports about how the newspaper business is in trouble, the situation hasn't yet become as dire as some make it out to be. However, that's not stopping plenty of hand-wringing. That could be good if those newspapers were coming up with innovative solutions. The amusing part, though, is how so much of the discussion is looking backwards at what the industry did wrong and whining about it, rather than what they can do in the future. For example, we see complaints about how newspapers never should have given away content for free online. This makes little sense for a variety of reasons. If newspapers had started out by charging, most of them would have discovered exactly what the few news organizations that charged early on discovered: unless you were the WSJ, breaking news that people can make money on, almost no one would pay. Just ask Microsoft how their experiment with Slate went initially. In the meantime, we keep hearing about sites starting to make more money out of online ads by getting increasing amounts of traffic. Notice that AOL (which is basically a "charge for content" type of company) has moved away from the walled garden mentality? Either way, who cares what the newspapers should have done years ago. It's too late now. However, other suggestions aren't much better. The idea that newspaper should learn things from Hollywood is particularly laughable. Exactly how has Hollywood "adapted" to the internet age? They're being dragged, kicking and screaming, all the way. The actual article talks more about how Hollywood "embraced" DVDs, but that was only after a very long fight. Following the Hollywood reaction seems like the last thing you should recommend.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
No Subject Given
Why isn't there any "technology consultancy" agencies getting payed to help point these industries in the right direction? Mike, you should be getting payed to tell these people this to their faces.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: No Subject Given
Why isn't there any "technology consultancy" agencies getting payed to help point these industries in the right direction? Mike, you should be getting payed to tell these people this to their faces.
We do get paid to tell this to their faces. Techdirt Corporate Intelligence. :)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: No Subject Given
Haha, that explains why you're so comprehensive then. Keep up the good work.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
No Subject Given
Just like the record companys, they refuse to accept the electronic media will take a large share of their business
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Remember A.M. Radio?
I believe that newspapers are headed the way of am (and fm) radio, and books for that matter. Technology obsolete, serving niches only - not the broader market. Local (like within 5 miles of your suburban house) news makes sense and probably won't be replaced by other media sources. National news, International news, i.e. 'real news' has great economy of scale and the internet (read: 'your non-print medium of choice') is the right delivery medium for this. That's my two cents - probably worth about that much.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
god
The one thing about this article, it answers alot of questions about feelings on scripture. Before we asses the real imact of this, " information at our finger tips....." try implementing what we have now in trird world countries. Then we can see the amazing technology boom.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)