Bleeding Edge

Bleeding Edge

by Mike Masnick




Mobile Phones That Spot The Cancer They Might Have Caused?

from the not-quite... dept

We've pretty much stopped all mentions of any study concerning whether or not mobile phones cause cancer. A new one tends to come out every other month or so, saying pretty much the opposite of what the last one said. However, if a mobile phone is going to cause cancer, why not have it help detect it as well? A researcher in Israel is apparently working on a new technology that would use a mobile phone to help detect certain kinds of health problems, including breast cancer and heart disease. The details aren't entirely clear, but it seems to use an infrared imaging system and some software to interpret the results. Since it's on a mobile phone, it can also send the data off to a doctor. While it may still be a bit away, it also shows how the mobile phone is increasingly becoming a platform for all kinds of applications. In the past, anyone building a heart monitor or cancer detector would probably look to build a completely specialized device. However, it's good to see some looking for ways to leverage what many people already have to build what is likely to be both a cheaper and more effective solution.

5 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Dec 12th, 2005 @ 1:34am
  • Sensitivity? Specificity?

    by dorpus

    Why stop there? Why not have profiteers design AIDS tests that go with your mobile phone, so they give low-quality tests that fail to detect HIV in people who have it, while falsely giving positive results for people who don't have it?

    From a medical researcher's point of view, the social irresponsibility of this technology is staggering. But I guess some scientist got lucky on their grant scam.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Dec 12th, 2005 @ 4:50am
    • Re: Sensitivity? Specificity?

      by Anonymous

      Why stop there? Why not design cellphones that detect if the operator is a totally retarded idiot (i.e., Dorpus) and have it blow up and kill the operator.

      I'd be willing to pay an extra $1 per month to my mobile phone provider for such a service...

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Dec 12th, 2005 @ 5:19am
      • Re: Sensitivity? Specificity?

        by dorpus

        Looks like Mike has low self esteem today.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Dec 12th, 2005 @ 6:14am
        • Re: Sensitivity? Specificity?

          by Sissy Pants

          I love the idea of a cell phone / tricorder! Does that mean when I'm using it I'm part of an away team?

          I'm Capt James T. Kirk of the starship Enterprise. To boldly go where no cell phone user has gone before!

          I'm sure some guy walking around scanning boobs and balls will go over great!

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Dec 12th, 2005 @ 9:14am
  • Ya right...

    by kevin cagle

    Ok, lets incorporate a heart monitor into a cell phone. Sure thats a reliable device. Maybe, bluetooth to communicate to a cell phone but you will NEVER see these 2 technologies as one. Cell phones just do not provide the reliability needed to become all-in-one devices for the mdeical industry.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It