Wall Street

Wall Street

by Joseph Weisenthal


Filed Under:
banks, wall street

Companies:
citigroup, goldman sachs



More Banks Set To Establish Their Own Stock Exchanges

from the privately-public dept

Last week, private equity firm Apollo Management announced that it would sell shares of itself on a private stock exchange run by Goldman Sachs. Because the exchange is closed to most investors, companies listing on it don't have to comply with various government regulations, which they would if they were to list on, say, the New York Stock Exchange. Considering all of the headaches associated with being a public company these days, this option may look increasingly appealing for companies looking for an alternative way to raise money and give its owners liquidity. It's not surprising, then, that many of the big name investment banks, including Citigroup, JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers, and Morgan Stanley are all rushing to build out their own private, electronic stock exchanges. The question, however, is whether or not these various exchanges will be compatible or whether they'll be islands, with little inter-exchange trading. If they're the former, then a robust alternative market could flourish. If it's the latter, then the appeal to both traders and companies is likely to be limited.

5 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Jul 23rd, 2007 @ 11:43am
  • Fools and their

    by Palmyra

    money will be soon parted if the invest in unregulated exchanges.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jul 23rd, 2007 @ 1:20pm
  • new stock exchanges

    by Cake Walk

    And the rich will keep getting richer....faster...since they can now change the rules of the game to suit their own interests.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jul 23rd, 2007 @ 1:57pm
  • dirty commies

    by andy

    these exchanges aren't "unregulated," they're just subject to different regulations.

    the company could have just as easily issued some bonds and — as long as the number of shareholders was low enough, etc... — stayed away from sarbanes-oxley headaches.

    there's nothing shady about this... they're not changing the rules of the game, they're playing a different game... AND IT STILL HAS RULES.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Jul 23rd, 2007 @ 4:08pm
    • Re: dirty commies

      by Mystified

      OK andy - cite some of those rules! Just who will regulate the companies on these new exchanges to keep them from doing the naughty deeds Sarb-Ox is intended to stop?

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Aug 5th, 2007 @ 6:42pm
  • Scam

    by Dave Deerak

    BX, and VG were basically two hairs away from being unlistable on the NYSE. BX gives hareholders very limited ownership rights, and VG held MUCH news private and blackboxed their numbers.


    the stock prices since IPO speak for themselves. Goldman's exchange will soon be in direct competition with the penny stock sin the pink sheets market. NYSE is shaking in their boots im sure. I hope this gets bigger and GS's market picks up, id short EVERY stock at ANY oppertunity. Ask yourself, what is the company hiding that they had to list themselves on a lax, unregulated, bias toward the executives market? SHORT SHORT SHORT

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It