Old Fogeyism Isn't That Surprising
from the kids-these-days dept
Last week Thomas Friedman penned a silly column claiming that Internet-based activism doesn't "count" as real political engagement. "Activism can only be uploaded, the old-fashioned way — by young voters speaking truth to power, face to face, in big numbers, on campuses or the Washington Mall. Virtual politics is just that — virtual," he says. As various people have pointed out, this is complete nonsense. I engaged in some campus activism in college in the late 1990s, and I have trouble even imagining how students coordinated their activities in the pre-email days. Blogs have proven an incredibly potent force for rooting out and publicizing injustice. And I'm sure the technologies that have evolved since I graduated are just as valuable to campus activists. Obviously, online activism by itself doesn't accomplish anything, but by the same token neither do telephone calls or newspaper columns. Rather, these are all tools that activists can use to coordinate their activities more efficiently. Many of the people who sign up for candidates' Facebook groups do go to the candidates' rallies or volunteer for their campaigns.
Timothy Lee is an expert at the Insight Community. To get insight and analysis from Timothy Lee and other experts on challenges your company faces, click here.


Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
Ahhh Tim, could you define old? Does 45 put me in that bucket? I hope not.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Communications revolution
Old-time storybook fable—
Disaffected university students seize radio and televisions stations...Declare proletarian uprising....Workers and peasants toss out old corrupt pigs....New government makes gesture of national gratitude—Brilliant leadership and forceful initiative of students—Students seized all communications—Revolution all thanks to students....Big party...Lots of vodka...Flowers...
Worker's and Peasant's Government closes university....Throws students in gulag.
Just old tale.
Made into Hollywood movie.
Grossed $x million dollars at box office.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
he's a dinosaur...
probably thinks the internet is made of tubes...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Organizing in the bad old days
"I engaged in some campus activism in college in the late 1990s, and I have trouble even imagining how students coordinated their activities in the pre-email days."
Please tell me you're kidding.
I go onto a college campus about once a week during the school year, and as far as I can see, the student groups still know how to set up regular meetings at a reliable place and time.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Organizing in the bad old days
I think the point was, how did they inform eveybody about the meeting prior to email.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Organizing in the bad old days
"I think the point was, how did they inform eveybody about the meeting prior to email."
Okay: bulletin boards. No, I mean those things that go on walls.
I'm still hoping Mr. Lee is kidding. I was in college in the late 1990s too, and I didn't encounter any student organizations that used e-mail for serious purposes.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
This sounds like a job for the Moustache of Understanding.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
As I grow older, I understand better
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
So, this blog is all in my imagination? I have to say "old people complain" is one of the weakest posts I've seen here yet. My car gets five rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it. -Abe Simpson
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Thomas Friedman could kick Tim Lee's intellectual
If Tim Lee had bothered to really read Friedman's article, he would have noticed that Friedman said nothing about modern life vs. (say) the 60s in terms of getting people together on an issue. I believe Friedman acknowledges that the internet and all that it has spawned have done wonderful things for communication. No one doubts that young people are interested in political candidates, environmental issues, DMCA, etc. Our interest in all these things and more is perfectly evident by the sheer numbers of blogs, online groups, websites, etc. devoted to all these things.
What Friedman is saying (which is perfectly clear if you pay attention to traditional media and your community and government leaders) is that all the online noise doesn't impact the issues in any meaningful way. Sure, a tech company like apple can hear the complaints online when they drop the price on the iPhone and then offer a $100 coupon. But politicians in your city counsel, state house, or in Congress just aren't getting the memo. Yes, they all have interns, runners, pages, etc who are "in the know" and see what is going on online. Unfortunately, however, until the discontent of (what should be) the all powerful 18-35 demographic really gets in the faces of these people (the ones that truly hold the power) there won't be any substantive changes made.
I can go on and on with examples, but I don't need to. Why do you think no one cared about global warming until Al Gore starred in a MOVIE?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
As I grow older, I understand better
Every time I see Andy Rooney on 60 minutes it reminds me of people like Thomas Friedman. Some older people will never fully understand the technology available today and how it can be used to improve methods of the past.
His "activism days" are at times much different than those of today. He believes what he believes and that's fine with me. Just think how boring this world would be if we all thought the same.
I have problems with youngsters who listen to iPods in public 24/7 without ever communicating with a human. How does that classify me?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Young voters? Thats pretty good.
How did new technology and new media work out for Howard Dean?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
One thing is abundantly clear, and completely recognized by virtually all activist organizations: online petitions and email campaigns are not nearly as effective as telephone calls or old fashioned letters. Perhaps some day that will be different, but we've had email for a long time and still it does not come close to the impact of phone calls or letters. So on that score, Friedman is completely correct.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I'm over 62. I guess I'm age qualified to be a fogey. Maybe I should stop reading blogs and just retire to my rocker and speak of the good old daze of the 60's when men were real men, women were real women and revolution was real revolution announced as God intended it to be - on a mimeograph.
Or instead, maybe I'll say "Far out. I can dig it. It's so groovy to have new ways of expressing power to the people. Right on"
I actually agree with Anon2's (#12) comment.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
And the mimeograph begat the photocopier, and it was good, and it could be commandeered in the Library or the Lit department.
For national reach, you can't beat mail in Major Domo, but for local exposure, you can't beat a poster on Utility Polo.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
to the posters who think that friedman doesn't get it...
read a few of his books/columns.. he gets it.. he probably gets what's happening in the world as a result of technology, and it's myriad implications quite a bit more than most..
the ageism that i detect from some posters is funny as hell, if it weren't so blatant. but that's why a good number of the "yougner" people that i've interviewed have this view that they are deserved/owed something, as opposed to really rolling putting in the work.
let's face it.. facebook/social networks/web2.0 isn't the end of tech! in fact, a good number of seriously low level innovations in key tech areas like semi-conductor physics is still coming from nicely aged researchers...
it's also this ageism that is behind the lack of investments in tech businesses by older founders..
peace
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
#1 and #14: old-fogeyism is a state of mind as much as a chronological age.
#4: my point is that organizing the tabling and protests and whatnot is much, much easier with email. Yes, I'm sure you can do the same things with bulletin boards, phone calls, etc. But it's a lot more work and takes longer.
#10: the Internet provided Howard Dean with visibility and fundraising prowess he never would have had in the pre-Internet days. The fact that his campaign didn't have any clue how to convert all that money and enthusiasm into election victories isn't the Internet's fault.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment