RSS
Twitter
One More Time: The PDA Market Is Meaningless To Measure
from the please-stop-now dept
For years, we've been complaining about all these ridiculous studies that moan about how the "PDA" (personal digital assistant) market is shrinking, yet they keep on coming. The fact is that the market isn't shrinking at all -- it's just changing as PDAs are built into smartphones. Back when the internet was first catching on and people who had originally bought PCs were suddenly upgrading to PCs with modems, we didn't hear people bemoaning the death of PCs. Instead, people realized that an internet-connected PC was simply a natural upgrade in the market. The same is true with PDAs turning into smartphones.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
"people who had originally bought PCs were suddenly upgrading to PCs with modems, we didn't hear people bemoaning the death of PCs. Instead, people realized that an internet-connected PC was simply a natural upgrade in the market. "
Yeah, but the general middle-class population buying new cars which have "iPod Compatible" interfaces are still not considered a natural upgrade... just an added "feature".
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The end of the horse-and-buggy marked the decline of personal transportation.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Meaningful
"The market isnt shrinking"
What? The market is shrinking. The article clearly differentiates between smartphones and PDAs. Thus, the market study is only about PDAs without cellphone ability. To complete you analogy when PCs with modems came out -- the market for PCs without modems shrank.
Your confusion probably comes from thinking there is no market for PDAs without cellphone ability. However, i would bet there are plenty of specific uses for such a device.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
To me, a PDA is not connected to any network by definition. It is simply your personal repository of information. Therefore, the PDA market is shrinking.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: "by definition"
Ummm, so the article argues that the definition is wrong.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: PDA definition
Duane: So are you saying a Palm with WiFi isn't a PDA??? What are you talking about? I use the WiFi in my PDA to bring my portable store of information up-to-date almost every day.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Good thing
Thank you for your definition. I found I didn't know what a PDA was till I looked at your post. I have a PDA and I have a Phone. I have a softphone on my dell axim that connect to wifi. So is this not a PDA? Oh I also have bluetooth on it too?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
PDA Definition
Taken from Wikipedia:
"Personal digital assistants (PDAs) are handheld computers, but have become much more versatile over the years. PDAs are also known as pocket computers or palmtop computers. PDAs have many uses: calculation, use as a clock and calendar, accessing the Internet, sending and receiving E-mails, video recording, typewriting and word processing, use as an address book, making and writing on spreadsheets, scanning bar codes, use as a radio or stereo, playing computer games, recording survey responses, and Global Positioning System (GPS). Newer PDAs also have both color screens and audio capabilities, enabling them to be used as mobile phones (smartphones), web browsers, or portable media players. Many PDAs can access the Internet, intranets or extranets via Wi-Fi, or Wireless Wide-Area Networks (WWANs). Many PDAs employ touch screen technology."
I have a PPC phone, and I consider it a PDA.
Duane: By your definition, a car with auto parallel parking is not a car, because it doesn't require someone to drive it for part of the time.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
they are but..
im certain the regular ol pda market is shrinking overall. but the industrial uses for pda's has been pretty strong, this is what my company deals in. I dont know anyone who has bought a straight-up PDA in ages (remember the dell axim?) but our sales of industrial pda's has been growing significantly, as this is a niche application that proved to acutally be useful.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Use to have PDAs. Back to paper
Used to have Casiopea, and afterwards some HP PDA.
Two years ago I stopped using, and went back to using a normal journal. It's practical, doesn't break down or run out of batteries, doesn't crash, and I don't look like an idiot every time I need to write something down.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Car = automobile?
"By your definition, a car with auto parallel parking is not a car, because it doesn't require someone to drive it for part of the time."
Are you talking about automobiles? Because I thought that a self steering device would by definition make it MORE of an automobile.
Let's all nitpick everything the world ever. That's what the internet is for, right? The point is: PDA + phone = smart phone = good. PDA = why bother?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I want them separate...
Well, the next phone I get will be just a phone - I want something that will ONLY make calls, not something that tries to jam a PC into into something the size of a bar of chocolate. I have a better separate camera, a better separate MP3 player, a better separate radio, all much easier to use. MUCH easier.
The PDA problem is a price one, and I am twitching to get myself an ASUS eee... Is that a PC, a mobile PC, A smart phone without phone functions, a handheld, and ultra portable laptop, a media player?
Who cares...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: I want them separate...
Thanks Nick, I thought I was the only one that felt this way. I have all of the gadgets you mention, plus an (old) Dell Pocket PC which still functions just fine for what I use it for, including email access via wifi. I agree that they are all easier to use than trying to type on a mobile phone.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
A phone and wireless PDA can be best as separate d
Some may find a phone, wifi device, and PDA together, a handy device. But a phone needs to be a voice communication device with an address book and maybe a calendar/todo list. That takes care of most daily functions. In that way it is tiny and only needs number keys, and eliminates notes in your pockets. Perfect for most people.
But a PDA without a phone would mean a lot to those who want to remotely store and retrieve thoughts, pictures, and sound. That is a larger unit. That needs a QWERTY keyboard, a camera, wifi for browsing and email and IMs, calendar/to do list/notes recording, and a way of recording things you hear and a way of playing back music and podcasts while you are on the move. Do this and still fit in your pocket, play in your car, and sync with your computer is useful as a second carry-around unit.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I said "to me"
haha you guys are a piece of work. I was careful to open the post with "To me" as in, my personal view of what a PDA is, not what Wiki or some other authority believes.
The car analogy was N/A.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: I said "to me"
Well you are a retardo. PDA= Personal Digital Assistant. Not
PDA=Nice little computer that has no network connectivity, but is packed with applications that would be greatly enhanced with it.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: I said "to me"
Here is a curler, today I got an insurance claim for my lost O2 PDA declined because they defined my PDA as "mobile/portable radio telecomunicationn equipment e.g. mobile / portable telephones and pagers" which they do not cover. Thing is I was overseas at the time and my PDA did not have a sim card in it and was not connected to any network. Can I argue it is not a phone in this instance? Opinions please :)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment