(Mis)Uses of Technology

(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
fbi, payment, wiretaps

Companies:
fbi



FBI Not Good At Paying Wiretap Bills

from the a-near-total-mess dept

While the FBI has regularly decided that court orders aren't necessary for wiretaps, it is a bit surprising to find out that it seems to feel the same way about paying the bills for wiretaps. Newly released info show that the FBI often failed to pay its wiretapping bills, leading one telco to cut off the FBI's wiretaps until it finally paid up. Given how screwed up the FBI's computer systems are, perhaps it's not surprising that they don't have an acceptable accounts payable system either.

17 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Jan 10th, 2008 @ 6:47pm
  • by Overcast

    All the money they soak from us for taxes... and they can't pay their phone bills? Maybe they are too busy nosing into people's business and not taking care of their own.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 10th, 2008 @ 7:24pm
  • by Rick

    I wish it was that easy. Wait, maybe, just maybe.....

    If we stop paying taxes, will the government stop functioning? PLEASE!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 10th, 2008 @ 8:02pm
  • Telecoms

    by Justin

    What I find funniest:

    "Some of the problems stemmed from telecoms billing multiple times for individual surveillance warrants -- which, in the case of Cox Communications, costs $1500 for a 30-day wiretap order."

    At least now we know they're fair in their greed; they overcharge the government just as much as they overcharge us.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 10th, 2008 @ 8:06pm
  • comon sense

    by jJack Rennscheidt

    Perhaps we need a Department Of Common Sense which would have the power to over rule other government department's foolish regulations, rules, edicts, and fiats. They could tell other agencies, "We have studied your proposals and find them completely idiotic and just plain stupid." The same would apply to Congress...there's a lot of stupidity there too. Probably 80% of the government could be eliminated. Of course it will never happen: it makes too much sense

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 10th, 2008 @ 8:15pm
  • What scruples?

    by Greybeard

    I find it interesting that the phone companies won't turn down wiretaps based on ethical considerations but if you don't pay your bill you're history? It makes it entirely too clear where the Corporate Ethic lives ... the Basement!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Jan 10th, 2008 @ 8:17pm
    • Re: What scruples?

      by Anonymous Coward

      What does paying your bill have to do with ethics at all?

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Jan 11th, 2008 @ 3:49am
    • Re: What scruples?

      by Enrico Suarve

      LOL - damn fine point

      I love the fact that its a paid service, I'd never even considered it before. I wonder if they have a brochure with different options. Does the deluxe service come with pager notifcation, do they get SMS messages informing them that to qualify for reduced rate wiretapping, their targets just need to make another 2 minutes of calls today?

      Do they get their own helpdesk and does it suck as much as the normal one? "oh I'm sorry I just sent the invoice for wiretapping to the wiretap address - is that a problem?"

      I love it

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Jan 11th, 2008 @ 1:07am
  • dystopia - "protecting" freedom

    by Dave Z

    The dystopia of THX-1138 hits the FBI.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 11th, 2008 @ 2:48am
  • by Unknown Coward

    Throw the deadbeats in the slammer!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 11th, 2008 @ 5:31am
  • Your Phone Bill

    by Alfred E. Neuman

    I wonder if they have to pay all those silly additional charges as well.

    For example the Universal Service Charge, because those living in rural areas are in need of affordable wiretaps.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 11th, 2008 @ 6:45am
  • by Anonymous Coward

    So if they are so bad at actually doing things, why is everyone so worried about their capabilities?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 11th, 2008 @ 7:15am
  • Federal Income Taxes

    by M. Thompson

    Actually there is no constitutional provision for FEDERAL taxes.

    If I read it correctly (and I am by no means an expert) it provides for states to tax the populace but does not allow the government to tax our earnings.

    "The first U.S. income tax, enacted in 1862 to pay for the Civil War, was repealed 10 years later."

    "In 1894, Congress tried to bring back income taxes, but a year later the Supreme Court ruled them unconstitutional in the landmark "Pollack" case."

    "By 1913, Congress gave it one more shot, and the states ratified the Sixteenth Amendment, which says:
    -The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.-"

    So an amendment allows it, though there are a lot of arguments that say this was not ratified in the normal manner and therefore shouldn't be considered a legal amendment.

    The long and the short of it is, better just go ahead and pay the taxes, there are a multitude of people fighting this in courts, so eventually there will be an 'official' repeal (not likely) or the gov't will just say STFU and pay us! (most likely)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 13th, 2008 @ 8:19am
  • Warrantless wiretap?

    by Enemy Sympathizer

    "While the FBI has regularly decided that court orders aren't necessary for wiretaps ..."??

    That link says the FBI doesn't always get a court order when seeking calling records. Nothing about actual wiretapping -- listening in on phone calls. It's the NSA that apparently has done warrantless wiretapping, but even if you believe that was illegal (as I do), that's very different from the FBI doing it for domestic investigations.

    This administration does plenty of playing fast and loose with the law. Critics needn't play fast and loose with the facts in order to find something worth criticizing.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jan 14th, 2008 @ 7:40am
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Enemy Sympathizer, the NSA wasn't listening in on calls, the whole case whas about calling records.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Feb 12th, 2008 @ 6:26pm
  • wire tapping FBI lack of bill paying

    by Leland

    Your assertion that the FBI is foundless and without proof. In my opinion it is just another thing to bring us closer to being defeated by the enemy who wants to kill us. What do you people have to fear about having your telephones tapped? You must have something to hide. I say that if it saves us from another attack, tap away! The U. S. Government always pays its bills and you know it! Anyone who says otherwise is full of it! Get a life!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It