RSS
Twitter
RNC Backs Down On Threats Over T-Shirts With Its Logo
from the an-elephant-never-forgets,-but-sometimes-it-misuses-trademark-law dept
Paul Alan Levy writes in to let us know that following widespread press coverage of his challenge to the Republican National Committee to back down from suing CafePress over t-shirts that use the term "GOP" or show the RNC's elephant logo, that the RNC has in fact agreed to back down. It won't be suing CafePress or users, and will only ask that those who just show the logo or the term apply for a free license (though, it's unclear what happens if that license request is turned down). However, in following this story, Levy discovered that the RNC had also been threatening some individual sellers, especially on t-shirts that are critical of the RNC. Levy and Public Citizen have called on the RNC to withdraw the threatening letters, and warns the RNC that it may sue for declaratory relief (basically get a judge to say the t-shirts are perfectly legal) if the RNC does not withdraw the letters.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
"Levy and Public Citizen have called on the RNC to withdraw the threatening letters, and warns the RNC that it may sue for declaratory relief (basically get a judge to say the t-shirts are perfectly legal) if the RNC does not withdraw the letters."
Good on 'em.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
"Good on 'em."
The fact that they are stealing the logo which is a copyright violation, or the fact that they are critical of the RC?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
They aren't stealing the logo, the RNC still has it. They may be using it without permission, but why should we need permission to talk about politics?
Also, yes, being critical of the RNC is a good thing. So is being critical of the Democrats, and the Green, and the Libertarians. No one should be beyond the reach of criticism.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
If they are using the logo to show their dislike for a product, using "GOP" instead of "RNC" or with the circle-slash, doesn't that qualify as satire and fall under fair use? This is the same reason Walmart can't sue the WalmartSucks people.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
I thought Logos were Trademarks
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
Ahh, there's the rub. The bully is getting slapped around everuwhere it turns these days and now it's pitching a fit "cuz people ain't plain' nice." Fuck them the GOP is finished in America.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
sheesh
Political party should own nothing that could be considered IP. By definition, political party should be considered public domain.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Logos?! Copyrights?
How long have these logos been copyrighted? The copyright DOES expire... unless they're pulling a Disney on us...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
RNC backs down
Uh, any chance that the RNC isn't familiar with the First Amendment? Wouldn't printed material like t-shirts be covered? One of the major whole points of this country is to protect the expression of unpopular ideas. Guess the Republicans are a little unclear on the concept except when it involves them trashing someone they don't like (Hilary comes to mind. No boundaries there that I could see).
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: RNC backs down
Copyright and trademark pre-empt first ammendment rights. You're free to say whatever you want so long as you don't infringe on my property.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: RNC backs down
"the RNC admits that it has no claim against anybody who combines either an elephant or the acronym GOP with expressive words or design elements (whether positive or negative toward the Republicans."
looks like you disagree with the people you're trying to defend
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: RNC backs down
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: RNC backs down
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Ah Geeze, for the last time
It is NOT a copyright violation. It especially is NOT a copyright violation if they are using it to make a statement against the RNC. That is defined in the fair use statute.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Trademarks
A major problem exists. (nothing to do with RNC) When a licence (yes it is spelled correctly) is issued, it also becomes a licence to steal. Buyers can pay anywhere up to three times for a logo labeled item. The market is inaccessible to many and that is unfair. Logo protection should have time limits like patents. Not everyone is rich.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment