RSS
Twitter
Are Scientific Journals Recognizing The Value Of Open Access Publishing?
from the that-would-be-good-news dept
We've had numerous articles over the years concerning the rise of "open access" scientific
journals, which focus on making the research they publish openly available (usually
online) to anyone who wants it, rather than the more traditional method of going through
ridiculously expensive journals. This movement has certainly gained plenty of steam in
the past fast years, even as many of the traditional publishers have done everything
possible to fight it.
However, as SteveD points out to us, last week one of the big traditional publishers,
Springer Science+Business Media acquired one of the more successful open access journals, BioMed
Central, which has shown that it's possible to be an open access journal and
profitable at the same time (wonders never cease). The author of the article notes,
correctly, that it would certainly be a good thing if the old-line journals are finally
recognizing that open access journals are an important and profitable part of scientific
discussion, rather than just fighting them at every turn.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
I've seen this before
Embrace, Extend, ... shoot, can't remember what comes next.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
It's Open Access Day, fyi
http://openaccessday.org/
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The pessimist perspective
I have a feeling this is more along the lines of what EA does. Embrace, extinguish, end of competitor. Hopefully, I'll be wrong and Mike will be right...
NB
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
This shows also the inherent risk in publishing in such a media. It is possible that once in a private domain, these "open source" entities can be shut down and all the published articles become unavailable. Unilike paper journals, in which libraries have copies of, the servers that store these articles may be the only source of a particular article. Perhaps a public web library should be mandated in order to ensure they are always available.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Yes, but look at the reason why the publisher sold out. The open access journals were running at a loss. That's not a good business model.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
One wonders if they bought them in order to shut them down.
Woadan
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment