RSS
Twitter
RIAA Gets Tennessee Law To Force Universities To Filter Networks For Copyrighted Content
from the the-riaa-never-sleeps dept
After more than a decade of watching the entertainment industry (mainly the RIAA and the MPAA), one thing I've learned is that the organization never gives up in pushing its legislative agenda. If there's a setback in one area, you can be sure that others from the organization are eagerly pushing the exact same rules through some other angle. The typical MO is that they try to get federal legislation passed in their favor. However, if that fails, they switch to the fallback plans which involve international treaties and state laws. Both of these are great because they tend to get a lot less scrutiny. State laws are a bit of a pain, because you have to get a few of them approved to create the "groundswell" that makes other states jump on board, but changes to state laws can often pass through under the radar.
That appears to be what's happening in the effort to force universities to install filters monitoring their networks for any unauthorized transmissions. You may recall that the RIAA pushed strongly to get Congress to pass laws requiring filters. Basically, the entertainment industry first flat-out lied (yes, lied) about how big a problem file sharing on campus was, and that got some Congressional Reps (with plenty of campaign contributions from the entertainment industry) to introduce legislation punishing universities if they didn't filter their networks. Widespread outcry against that legislation helped water it down, but it appears the industry just moved on to state legislatures.
The RIAA is now celebrating the fact that Tennessee has passed legislation that requires universities to install filters if they've received at least 50 DMCA requests. Considering the massive number of DMCA notices that the RIAA has been known to file, this is hardly a large hurdle. The law will cost Tennessee taxpayers nearly $10 million in the first year, and another $1.5 million each year -- based on the state's own estimates. And for what? To put in filters that won't work, just to try to prop up an obsolete business model from legacy players in an industry that needs to learn how to adapt to the market?
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
do they get to turn the filters off for ever 50 counternotices filed?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
if so those filters will go up and down more than a yo-yo
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The only solution ...
The only solution to this problem is to eliminate copyrights. Not easy, I agree, but nothing less will stop the nonsense.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
ssh tunneling / sftp :: problem solved (on pirate side)
for everyone else...oh right they get screwed as usual
bad laws get passed
innocents get sued/expelled/bankrupted
universities pay for upkeep and installation of filters
network expansion is restricted by the use of such filters
riaa still doesn't make more from sales
riaa still doesn't 'lose' less from piracy
piracy doesn't go down
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
RIAA = Real Ignorant Assholes of America!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
Attacking the act of 'sharing' takes quite a bit of arrogance. I suggest.
Real Ignorant Arrogant Assholes
; )
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
http://azureus.sourceforge.net/
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Wow
Just go off campus to a friends house with cable and this will really be effective.
Remember to always use PeerGuardian and DL away.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Easy to fix
Instead of squandering tax payer moneys on worthless pursuits, the state of Tennessee and others should pass a law stating that all state funded schools shall not provide on campus network connectivity. Each student can get their own connection as they see fit. End of problem.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
This is fucking sick. They should at least finance this. Why should be public money spent of protecting corporate business? Oh wait, never mind... This is United Corporations of America, I almost forgot for a moment that "people" and "public" don't matter in this country:((
A.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
FOR THE PEOPLE, NOT THE CORPORATIONS!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
tell them if they want t they pay for it.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
What's worse is that the University of Tennessee (the most likely target of this law) is already suffering pretty badly from budget cuts. They cut an entire department this year; they can't afford to do stupid pointless things like this.
At least I'm finally off their networks; good grief.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Hey idiots what is Nashville's nickname? Figure it out. Total music revenue for Nashville was 2.6 billion in 2006.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
"Hey idiots what is Nashville's nickname? Figure it out. Total music revenue for Nashville was 2.6 billion in 2006."
Oh - ok.
It all makes so much more sense now. Thank you.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
Wow, your sarcasm just showcases your arrogant ignorance.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
RIAA
In your article you use the phrase "legislative agenda." You don't state what that is, or what YOUR version of it is. How can I compare your argument to theirs?
JR
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: RIAA
If you do not know what their agenda is by now, you must have been living under a rock for the last 10 years.
Please google 'RIAA' and it is all over the net how much they hate their customers. They are driven by one thing and one thing only, money. And they will extract it any way they possibly can. Including getting legislators at any level to pass laws where it sues public funds to enforce their private agenda.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: RIAA (typo)
That should say "uses" and not "sues" in the last line there.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Tennessee
I live in Tennessee.. I don't go to a university.. but I am appalled at this! Who wrote this bill? I want to vote them out ASAP!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Tennessee
I live in Tennessee.. I don't go to a university.. but I am appalled at this!
Fun fact: you're the one paying for this.
Also: it doesn't matter, really, who wrote it. Find out who voted for it and campaign to have them removed in the next round of elections.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Tennessee
RIAA Chairman & CEO Mitch Bainwol, along with several other members of the music community, recently celebrated Country Music Association Day in Nashville by participating in a ceremonial signing of college campus anti-piracy legislation by Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen.
http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9845/Tennessee+Governor+Signs+Campus+Piracy+Bill+into+Law/
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
$10 mil ?
Any chance you can explain why it costs 10mil to install software, filters?
If you use figures in your argument, you might be able to explain them, or tell us were you saw these numbers. What government source?
JR
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: $10 mil ?
Any chance you can explain why it costs 10mil to install software, filters?
http://www.legislature.state.tn.us/info/Leg_Archives/105GA/bills/FiscalNotes/SB3974.pdf
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Just shows how STUPID the RIAA is, They need to be wiped off the face of the Earth
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
details
not sure why this is just now getting attention. i've been blocked since august. here are the details utk has on its site
http://oit.utk.edu/copyright/blocked/
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Tax CDs
By far the easiest way to deal with this is to add a TN tax on CDs of say $.10 per CD to pay for the filters. I'm sure the music sellers wouldn't want to take a free ride on the TN population and after all it's they who benefit.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
One thing that might help limit legislation is for the sons and daughters of Government officials to be outed. Then the RIAA would have to explain why they are doing selective enforcement. Image the closing arguments at a jury trial where the defense explains how RIAA only goes after people that are not part of the Goverment that passes the laws they and their families do not have to obey.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
RIAA, death and taxes - what they all have in common
Good story.
Our tax dollars are not only saving billionaire bankers from their own bad habits, they're also helping to bail out the recording industry. Does the RIAA really truly need our help? I don't think so.
More here: http://blogs.computerworld.com/riaa_tax
cheers,
dt
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
who said internet censoring in china was bad for democracy? what is good for china is good for the world!
-every file on internet is legal, or isn't it?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment