Bleeding Edge

Bleeding Edge

by Ryan




The Evolution of Linux

from the technology-mimics-biology dept

Linux will never beat Windows as the leading desktop OS. However, this unspecialised disadvantage on the PC is rapidly becoming an advantage for its use in other computing applications. Linux is currently going through a process biologists call adaptive radiation, it's spreading into various computing niches due to the high adaptability of its kernel. Linux may lose to Windows on the desktop but in the era of ubiquitous computing it will be a ferocious challenger for Microsoft.

12 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 4:15pm
  • Interesting...

    by Linux Geek

    I've noticed a lot of activities going on in the periphery of linux computing into alternative computing devices but I have to agree that the future of Linux (even though we all hate to admit) it will never be mainstream.

    BR

    Damn...I'm going to have to start using Windows again!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 5:39pm
    • Re: Interesting...

      by Anonymous Coward

      Woudln't it suck that Mac OS X out-shipped Linux, thus placing BSD in front of Linux

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 7:10pm
    • Re: Interesting...

      by Andy

      I've noticed a lot of activities going on in the periphery of linux computing into alternative computing devices but I have to agree that the future of Linux (even though we all hate to admit) it will never be mainstream.


      Damn...I'm going to have to start using Windows again!
      Not necessarily... it seems likely that Linux will become accepted by corporate IT departments, thus it will become increasingly easy to use Linux if you want to. I haven't used Windows for three years... but I'm lucky to work at a company where all the technical people use Linux as their desktop. We're a small, recently aquired, branch (twig?) of a cable company... but even the centralized product development group uses Unix for their desktops (usually Solaris).

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 6:17pm
  • Does the OS matter anymore?

    by mhh5

    I wonder why no one has "reverse engineered" MSOffice for platforms other than Win & Mac. (Assuming that it's possible to do!) Then no one would really care what OS they were using. Most people don't anyway. I think the only reason why Linux won't approach the desktop market is b/c no one has MS-compatible software for it.... Maybe when MS gets broken up, MSLinux will take over.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 7:04pm
    • Re: Does the OS matter anymore?

      by u2604ab

      MSLinux???? If that happens, I'll take up arms against the oppressor. Mark my words- If MS gets into linux they will destroy everything good about it.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 7:30pm
    • Re: Does the OS matter anymore?

      mhh5 writes: I wonder why no one has "reverse engineered" MSOffice for platforms other than Win & Mac. (Assuming that it's possible to do!) Then no one would really care what OS they were using. Most people don't anyway. I think the only reason why Linux won't approach the desktop market is b/c no one has MS-compatible software for it.... Maybe when MS gets broken up, MSLinux will take over.

      Um, StarOffice anyone?

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 11:04pm
      • Re: Does the OS matter anymore?

        by mhh5

        I didn't think StarOffice was fully compatible *with the same look-and-feel* of MSOffice... Is it? That's what I meant by "reverse engineer" MSOffice. There are already plenty of "office suite applications" that are semi-compatible with MSOffice. But no one uses them b/c the GUIs are slightly different, and no one wants to "re-learn" another spreadsheet, word processor, etc...

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Oct 23rd, 2000 @ 11:19pm
        • BTW...

          by mhh5

          Somewhat non sequitar thought here: the "new" Mac MSOffice is a really bad idea for Apple, I think. It will only exclude MacOS from *Ever* being an office computer. It's all fine and dandy to say "hey, it's MS-compatible, but it's got the look and feel of a mac!", but it's exactly that difference that prevents Macs from really entering the workplace. Administrative assistants do not like "new, improved" interfaces....

          I'm pretty sure that's the whole reason behind making a separate Mac edition. MS wants Macs to be a neat little *home* computer for the kiddies since no one will want to do office work on them.... There's already a MS-compatible suite of applications that has a "Mac look&feel" -- it's called AppleWorks. And no one uses it.

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

          • Oct 24th, 2000 @ 4:28am
          • Re: BTW...

            by L

            Funny you should say that about Admin assistants - I was talking to one of ours today and she has had her Mac replaced by a Windows machine and was saying how ghastly and hard to use she thought the interface was......

            L.

            (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It