RSS
Twitter
Europeans Lose Fair Use Rights
from the this-isn't-about-fairness... dept
Since things have been pretty busy here in the US keeping up with all the content companies suing their best customers, I hadn't necessarily been keeping up on the details of intellectual property laws elsewhere. According to this article, the dreaded The European Union Copyright Directive goes into effect today, making it illegal to make any sort of copy of a "DVD, CD or music file" (which one of these does not fit with the others?). Apparently, even if you make a backup copy only for personal use, you're facing criminal charges and the possibility of two years in jail. If the article is correct, taking a CD you own, ripping an MP3 and putting it on your iPod is now illegal. Actually, from the sound of this, using your iPod for anything other than songs you own the copyright on may be illegal. Good job, Europe.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Can't see how
European directives have to be approved and implemented by local governments to be effective. I think it would also be illegal in many countries.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Larger Agenda?
Could this be the EU's way of putting up barriers to American music that are corrupting their youth? Also a way to crack down on the illegal trade in skinhead music.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
No Subject Given
Reminds of the time they banned all computer games in Greece. Anyone else remember that? Yet another example of why people who do not understand technology have no business regulating it.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Not too sure about this...
I may be seriously wrong here, but isn't the EUCD technically speaking Directive 2001-29? And shouldn't this directive have been converted by December 22nd 2002? And doesn't this directive include a host of exceptions that member states are allowed to implement in their own national legislations, including most traditional 'fair use' rights? Of course, a member state may choose not to implement any of those, but that's hardly the directive's fault.
As a side note, there is another important directive whose deadline did expire on the 31st October, which is directive 2002-58. It's related (amongst other topics) to the use of cookies and spam, and forces member states to implement an opt-in system towards spam. Sounds like a good plan to me, but it has nothing to do with the EUCD.
So is the article completely misguided, or am I totally missing something here?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment