Email

Email

by Mike Masnick




Banning Emailed Executables

from the stick-with-not-executing-files dept

The latest tactic in stopping emailed virus attacks is to stop letting a mail server pass on emailed executables. MIT is apparently rejecting all such messages. Of course, the virus writers will quickly figure out a social engineering trick around this, and will try to get people to download the executable from somewhere else. Besides, there certainly are cases where it does make sense to email an executable, and suddenly people are going to need to figure out a way around that block.

4 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Nov 14th, 2003 @ 2:16pm
  • This by you is news?

    by Tom J.

    Most corporations have been doing this for YEARS. There are alternatives, called the web/FTP/etc for transferring executable binaries. When e-mail worms try to use secondary distributors for the executable code the infection can be stopped by killing that secondary source(s). Such worms have already been stopped this way, whereas the pure e-mail ones spread because too many ISPs don't block EXEs or even virus scan.

    Blocking e-mail executables currently stops most every major e-mail infector, including new variants as they pop up. A small price to pay, and again, e-mail was not designed for trading programs in the first place.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Nov 14th, 2003 @ 2:27pm
  • ZIP

    by Beck

    The standard way around this is to zip the executable files before sending them. Of course now I have started to receive emails with attached ZIP files that contain a virus. But the fight continues, because my new 2004 virus software scans the contents of zip files before the files are unzipped.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Nov 14th, 2003 @ 3:08pm
    • Re: ZIP

      by Anonymous Coward

      Outlook actually blocks zip files with executables or script files in them, the only real way around it is to rename the files. For example: runme.exe becomes runme.ex_

      This is how we've been currently working around it, but it would take work to execute it.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Nov 14th, 2003 @ 2:59pm
  • No Subject Given

    by Anonymous Coward

    seems to me that blocking executables that won't be executed automatically by an e-mail client is unnecessary. An individual clueless enough to execute such a file will also execute it if it arrives inside zip format.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It