Bleeding Edge

Bleeding Edge

by Mike Masnick




Why Humans Must Return To The Moon

from the why,-one-of-these-days... dept

Roland Piquepaille writes "Space.com gives us "10 Reasons to Put Humans Back on the Moon." While some of these reasons seem obvious, like our needs for dreams or a common goal for nations to collaborate, some are less expected, like generating energy from lunar power stations. This also could lead to the arrival of space tourism and to a better knowledge of our past through the analysis of craters and rocks in situ. And many new things also might be invented on the Moon just to live there. Finally, with men on the Moon, future explorations of Mars or asteroids could be easier to organize. The original article is spread over ten pages, so I put the full list of these ten reasons on my blog as a single page for your convenience, along with short quotes and other references. "

3 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Dec 10th, 2003 @ 3:02am
  • Reason #11

    by Anonymous Coward

    11: so we can stop making top 10 lists about why we need to go to the moon.

    I think the real reasone will become very evident over the next 50 to 100 years: because we can't control ourselves, as a species, from destroying the house we live in... and if we stay on this rock called "earth" nature will eventually get us anyway.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Dec 10th, 2003 @ 8:13am
  • Uncompelling

    I don't find any of these reasons especially compelling, especially when considered against the massive price tag that such a program would obviously possess.

    The reason for the original moon mission was "Because if we don't the Russians will win", with a large side-serving of "Because we can". The technology wins were bonuses, unexpected winfalls. Such an argument of peripheral technological and product progress is not a reasonable argument for such a mission. What technology has the Space Shuttle program provided us plebes? The ISS is too young to ask the same question about -- but eventually we are going to have to ask.

    I also don't buy the beaming-power-from-space argument -- hands up everyone who would live next to a receiving station... especially when the guidance computers on the transmitter 'wander'.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It