RFID Blocker Demonstrated

from the good-to-see... dept

There has been a lot of talk lately about RFID chips - both good and bad. They have tremendous potential, but also have some privacy questions associated with them. However, as we pointed out last summer, some researchers at RSA have been working on creative solutions to the privacy problem by creating an RFID blocker tag. It was kind of surprising that this news didn't get more coverage and seemed to go away quickly. Very few of the discussions about RFID privacy issues mention the potential of a blocker tag. However, now, RSA has begun demonstrating how the blocker tag works and maybe it will get some more attention. Unfortunately, it's not as impressive as I had hoped it would be. The demonstration involves a shopping bag that has a blocker tag. Anything in the bag is thus unreadable by RFID readers. The problem with this is that it still requires you to take the item out of the bag to scan. I was hoping there would be a more dynamic way of doing this so that items could be scanned from within the bag, but only when necessary and from the specific reader with permission to read it. Hopefully, that's where the technology is headed.

12 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. RFID Blocker

    by Joe Baderderm - Feb 24th, 2004 @ 12:53pm

    I just want to say that I own the patent to this and/or am already selling this on eBay.

    I'm surprised that it didn't get coverage for the potential misuse by criminals. I walk into department store X that uses RFID for security with an RFID blocking bag. I walk out the side door with as much stuff as will fit into the bag.

    The technology reminds me of radar detectors. Everyone knows how useful it will be, but for whatever reason, mainstream use is not very high. I don't really need them to RFID block my purchase of Cocoa Puffs. Take all the info you want from me, just don't let those crazy radio waves cause cancer or anything...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. No Subject Given

    by Anonymous Coward - Feb 25th, 2004 @ 10:15am


    http://www.spychips.com/

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. RFID Tag Blocker

    by John Thomas - Dec 3rd, 2004 @ 11:30am

    Do you know the scoop on the RFID disabler? It is called Tagzapper. If you have any info please contact me. I enjoy your pages, John

    You can go find it at www.tagzapper.com

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Re: RFID Blocker

    by Jimmy - Aug 12th, 2005 @ 9:17am

    BULL! And big deal! do you think the people in China care if you own a pantent? In France, NO ONE CARES. The product will still sell with or with out the patent.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Re: No Subject Given

    by RFID Gazette - Aug 12th, 2005 @ 9:19am

    WE SUCK

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. bla

    by Anonymous Coward - Jun 23rd, 2006 @ 9:35pm

    bla

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. bla

    by Anonymous Coward - Jun 23rd, 2006 @ 9:40pm

    bla

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. bla

    by Anonymous Coward - Jun 26th, 2006 @ 8:40pm

    bla

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. bla

    by Anonymous Coward - Jul 5th, 2006 @ 5:34pm

    bla

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. bla

    by Anonymous Coward - Jul 11th, 2006 @ 8:46am

    bla

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. RFID Blocker

    by Beelzebub - Feb 23rd, 2007 @ 10:24am

    I want one! DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER! Hey bla, you suck. Spammer.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. blockers/zappers

    by eric - Feb 18th, 2008 @ 7:15am

    it sucks that consumers just cant pass a law forbidding item level tagging in the first place. There are NO reasons to track AFTER purchase, THINK about it! I believe an ITEM LEVEL DETECTOR is tha invention to pursue and DONT BUY TAGGED ITEMS AS THEY CAN BE RE ACTIVATED! A receipt for returns with no id required should be sufficient. I would even give up my "right of return" if push came to shove to protect my privacy!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It