Too Much Free Time

Too Much Free Time

by Mike Masnick




Morse Code Gets The @ Sign - But It's Too Long

from the but-why? dept

The whole point of the @ symbol is that it's shorthand for the word "at." So, plenty of people (well, actually not that many care at all) are confused as to why the first update to Morse Code in 60 years to include the @ symbol has it much longer than just tapping out the word "at." The real issue is that "at" is apparently the same code as "w," though no one seems to have asked if anyone was actually confused by this. For those who care, the @ symbol can be tapped out as dit-dah-dah-dit-dah-dit. Update: Multiple people have noted that the report is wrong that "at" and "w" are the same, since there should be a pause between the "a" and the "t" designating "at". People who know better than I claim it's nearly impossible to be confused. This makes sense, though, as how else would you be able to write any words without confusing the hell out of people as the letters started to run together.

7 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Apr 15th, 2004 @ 1:27am
  • techdirt being late!?

    by pheloxi

    wow! you are late reporting this! CJ on line: @ symbol added to morse code I found this link on Dutch language site on 22 February 2004

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Apr 15th, 2004 @ 4:56am
    • Re: techdirt being late!?

      NPR's "All Things Considered" also ran a piece on this at least a month ago (it might have been "Marketplace," but I heard it on my drive home from work). It has seemed to me that this story has been dsicovered by a new news source each week. I wonder why the story has propogated so slowly.

      Maybe because people are using Morse code to spread the word?

      I think it's incredible (and maybe a little neat) that people are still using the code.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Apr 15th, 2004 @ 9:37am
      • Why still Morse?

        by Anonymous Coward

        Even in our very connected world, there are communications channels that are "noisy" enough not to support voice or data... they require the extreme S/N ratio capabilities of Morse.

        Example: You can talk literally halfway around the world, 12,000 miles or more, on 1-2 watts of transmit power using Morse and the correct frequencys. Can't do that with voice (unless using a lot more power).

        Of course, there are satellite systems that two way microburst and can run for a long time on batterys... but you can't build that transmitter yourself...

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Apr 15th, 2004 @ 5:44am
  • Mixed Media

    by Rob Henderson

    What is most interesting to me is that the driving force behind the inclusion of @ in the Morse lexicon is to give key tappers the ability to send email addresses! It's almost like inscribing a clay tablet to your neighbor, asking him to send you some data over your wireless LAN. THe longevity os some simple technology is amazing.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Apr 15th, 2004 @ 8:57am
    • Re: Mixed Media

      by Anonymous Coward

      Keep in mind the largest users of Morse today are probably Ham radio operators, which have integrated a lot of Ham radio stuff with the internet, so I'm not exactly surprised to hear this.

      (Morse used to be required for a Ham license, but I think that was removed in the last year or two).

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Apr 15th, 2004 @ 9:24am
      • Re: Mixed Media

        by Anonymous Coward

        There are some subset/restricted ham licenses that are now code free. To be fully (i.e. "general") licenced, you still need code.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Apr 15th, 2004 @ 1:07pm
  • @

    word "at" is dit dah (space) dah
    letter "w" is dit dah dah

    If you run the first ones together they sound similar to the second. You're not supposed to run them together.

    Mike W6INA

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It