Astroturfing Heats Up, Editors Don't Know What To Do
from the could-start-by-monitoring-sites... dept
"Astroturfing" is nothing new. There have been plenty of stories about letter campaigns to newspapers that were clearly pre-written by interested parties. However, as the political season heats up, the practice is apparently increasing rapidly and upsetting plenty of editors, who don't quite know what to do about it. Of course, as the first article notes, most of the astroturfing campaigns seem to come from just a few sites. Considering the number of tools out there for teachers to catch plagiarism by searching online, you would figure it wouldn't be that difficult to set up a similar offering to catch astroturfing. Still, some argue that the angry reaction from editors over astroturfing is blowing the situation out of proportion. The people who cut-and-paste are still making their opinions known, even if they're not really exactly their own opinions -- and some believe that's worthwhile, as cutting-and-pasting is more action than no action at all.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
newspaper astroturfing
I read that story yesterday, and there seemed to be an odd divide between the online and the offline world... most of what we see in newspapers these days does seem to be the results of press-the-flesh campaigns, so what's different if somebody gives only part of the story in their newspaper forums...?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment