Legal Issues

Legal Issues

by Mike Masnick


Print



Did Starbucks Tell An Art Project About Starbucks Not To Use Its Name?

from the misuses-of-trademark-law dept

This one seems odd, and there's not enough evidence here to know how true the story is (or what the details behind it are). However, Copyfight has noticed a blog post about an online "art project" to show a comparison of the locations of local coffee shops with local Starbucks. The idea, of course, is to encourage people to go to the non-Starbuckian shops (though, in its current format, with very few independent coffee shops included, it seems to serve the opposite purpose, by just showing you where the Starbucks are, and leaving you thinking there's no competition). However, what caught the attention of the Copyfighter in question was the comments to that blog post, where someone asks why the offering, called Delocator.net doesn't appear to actually mention Starbucks anywhere. Someone apparently involved with the project responds that they were not allowed to use the name Starbucks anywhere, as Starbucks' lawyers would not allow it. This brings up the obvious question: why should Starbucks' lawyers have a say in such things? The only claim they could make is a violation of trademark, and if the site is clearly not associated with Starbucks (and the fact that they're pushing people to go elsewhere might give you a hint that they're not associated with Starbucks), then it's not a violation of trademark. Instead, it looks like Starbucks is yet another company trying to use trademark law outside of its intended purpose of avoiding confusion over brands, but more towards anti-competitive practices. Will they go after another coffee shop that compares their coffee to Starbucks' next? Of course, thanks to this policy, hopefully the Delocator site will get additional publicity -- proving, once again, that the Streisand effect works. The more you try to shut something down, the more likely it will spread via the internet.

2 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. No Subject Given

    by msykes - Apr 5th, 2005 @ 4:02pm

    But they do mention Starbucks - when you search for a coffee shop based on zip code, it pulls up a bunch of Starbucks', and calls them all "Starbucks Store"

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. delocator.net

    by fs - Apr 5th, 2005 @ 9:20pm

    hi mike,

    allow for us to clear up the confusion. we (fs) opened an exhibition at SFAI in San Francisco, CA (http://sfai.edu/content/page.aspx?id=46) this past week under the same name. the institution (SFAI) would not allow us to use the word “starbucks” as a precautionary legal measure. they felt it could draw litigation and because of 11th hour (a weeks prior to opening) the wrangling on their part, we made the concession to accept the terms for the exhibition.

    this appears to be a product of the "telephone" game.

    it is also important to note that is not an exclusively anti-starbucks project rather we are using starbucks as an example to demonstrate the aggressive power of transnational corporations in our local communities.

    finishing school encourages users to download the code provided in the “toolkit” area and delocate someone else.

    thanks for the post.

    xoxo

    fs

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It