When Is Security-Breach Disclosure Too Much Disclosure?
from the what-do-we-do-now? dept
As Congress considers legislation requiring disclosure of data security breaches, some lawmakers are grappling with an issue that we’ve already been wondering about. How can you craft a law that forces companies to come clean on security breaches while not bombarding customers with too many notices? Notification is good — it keeps customers informed and companies accountable. But the risk is that the more frequent the notices, the more likely people will start tuning them out. It’ll be interesting to see what sort of balance a national law strikes. Perhaps each notice should come with a rating, in which an independent or law enforcement group assigns a risk level to the breach. Along with that, customers can be told what (if any) action they should take to deal with the situation, though this would probably involve giving customers more control over their information and how it’s used — and that would only make the political wrangling even worse.
Comments on “When Is Security-Breach Disclosure Too Much Disclosure?”
Heh.
Perhaps each notice should come with a rating, in which an independent or law enforcement group assigns a risk level to the breach.
…And in no time, you have an entity stacked with former executives from Choicepoint and Equifax, writing the rules and lobbying congress for law and handouts.