Surprises

Surprises

by Brett




FTC Starting To See Through Hollywood's Anti-P2P Excuses

from the waking-up dept

Not that long ago, lawmakers were showing their misunderstanding of file sharing by blaming the delivery mechanism for their concerns with the content. The entertainment industry still does this today in its attacks on file sharing networks and related technologies like BitTorrent, but at least some government types are starting to catch on. Among the conclusions of a report issued by the FTC today: The risks associated with P2P file sharing (viruses, spyware, porn, etc.) also exist with pretty much any other internet-related activity. Moreover, P2P opponents have not adequately shown that the hazards of file sharing networks are any different than elsewhere on the internet. Perhaps now Hollywood will fall back on the argument that file sharing is ruining its business. Oh wait, the FTC report said that's unclear too. Maybe the agency really is starting to get it.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. Jun 23rd, 2005 @ 8:21pm

    It'd be nice

    by seth

    It'd be nice if just once the government stood up for the people they represent and acted like the corporations didn't own them.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. Jun 24th, 2005 @ 12:15am

    Re: It'd be nice

    by Anonymous Coward

    But your forgetting that corporations are people too. They have the same rights as a real person. I mean why shouldn't they? How is a for profit business any different from a thinking, breathing, feeling human being. Same exact thing if you ask me.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. Jun 24th, 2005 @ 1:15am

    Re: It'd be nice

    by johnsmith

    First off it is lame to compare a 'living, breathing, human being' to a corporation. And even worse to suggest that a person is ?incorporated? That doesn't even make sense. The bottom line is no corporation or governing body can exercise control over the freedom of speech or the right to privacy which we are all entitled to (in the US). Moreover they want the WORLD to agree as well-lol

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Jun 24th, 2005 @ 7:37am

    Re: It'd be nice

    by Dave Lame

    Well if corporations are like a "real person", then they can only be like the kind of real person who's only interest is in lining their own pockets, regardless of the effect of others. Yes, in that way they're a kind of giant sociopath, stomping on anyone who gets in their way, while desperately trying to appear nice and normal.
    Stomp, stomp, stomp....

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Jun 24th, 2005 @ 7:44am

    Only one difference

    by Jeff

    Humans can be jailed for breaking the law. Corporations can't be.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. Jun 25th, 2005 @ 5:10am

    Re: Only one difference

    Ever heard of sarcasm?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Related Stories
Close
E-mail It