eHarmony's Patented Matching Algorithms Can't Find It A CEO Match

from the must-be-a-bug dept

eHarmony is the popular online dating service that’s well known for claims of being much more “scientific” in how they match up people. They expect potential subscribers to go through a long profile questionnaire, and even claim to hold a patent on matching people who are likely to have a successful relationship (no, seriously). However, it would appear that the system doesn’t work so well when it comes to matching CEOs to their own company. SiliconBeat is reporting that the company is on its third CEO since the beginning of the year (which wasn’t that long ago…). The last CEO, who was appointed in January turned out to be “not a good fit,” according to the new CEO (who is only temporary, while they look for a permanent one — meaning they’ll likely have a fourth CEO within a year). Well, at least we know one area that eHarmony probably shouldn’t expand its business into…


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “eHarmony's Patented Matching Algorithms Can't Find It A CEO Match”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
30 Comments
Scott says:

hardly a dating site

I wouldn’t call eharmony a dating site.

I think its more of a “i want to get married” site.

even after filling out their long profile you are not allowed to even look at photos of someone until after you have communicated with them… their thought being is you should get to know the person first before seeing if they look attractive to you or not.

I think okcupid is a much better system (and free) their matching system is fun and addicting (you take quizzes written by other users) and there are plenty of photos, blogs and profiles to browse

Shaun says:

I had a thought about how to improve the patent system, but it might not work as it could be hard to judge. My idea is that the length of time a patent is valid for depends on how novel it is. This would mean WORKING cold fusion would get you something like 20-30 years but 1-click shopping would get you a month. This could help deal with the obviousness test issues to some extent but the major problem is how to judje the novilty of the patent. (I can allready see the lawsuits and bribery allegations)

As I said quite possibly completely impractical but more ideas floating around about what could be done to fix the patent problem can’t hurt.

I havn’t actually looked at their patent so this could be wrong but I would think it would tend towards the month end of the scale ………… next thing you know you will be getting sued for introducing a friend to someone you think they might like.

agodel says:

matchmaker.com was the best dating site I found in silicon valley, match.com gave me matches in canada and phillipines, eharmony found me some serious poundage and yahoo was full of call girls pretending to be looking but for a fee. For some reason certain dating sites work better in certain areas, just gotta find one that works and is popular enough that you don’t get 5 year old profiles of people who have already gotten married and have kids.

japanese girls (user link) says:

Eharmony isn't that bad

Hey, there are some lonely people out there I guess. I liked EHarmony, but yeah the questionaire takes forever and you cannot even see the person. In fact I gave up my first time trying to fill it out because it took forever. Personally, I am a big fan of finding out what they look like. Here is a site you can try if you want to try to compete for your girl, or watch girls compete for you. It is mainly for girls and guys in hawaii and japan.

Amy Alkon, syndicated columnist, love, sex, dating (user link) says:

E-Harmony is just another site trying to use a gimmick to sell theirs over others. The truth is, according to research by Barbara Fasolo and others at Max Planck Institute, which sites are best relates to research on consumer choice. We aren’t prepared to deal with too much choice (when presented with it, we choose badly and are unhappy with our choices). This means that sites like Matchmaker.com, which has a search engine allowing members to narrow down their choices, are better than sites that don’t.

Because I write a syndicated advice column, I was given a free trial of E-Harmony early on. I couldn’t have been more poorly matched than if I’d picked the people at random out of the phone book with my eyes closed.

Bobby Tilton says:

Need I say more?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EHarmony

As someone already said, “Focus on the Famliy,” don’t know what it is, go google it.

If you are atheist, homosexual, married but legally seperated, divorced 3 time or more, or suffer from depression, you are AUTOMATICALLY removed from the match database…..but they don’t tell you that you are of course.

eHarmony is really just a weak dating site that has narrowed it’s client base to primariliy white christians(80%).

A bunch of bigots trying to make sure they match up those in the demographic that THEY deem to be “family orientated.” (or, bigots trying to make sure there will be more bigots bred)

Also, on the “survey” you take it is LOADED and I mean CHOCKED full of religious and faith based questions.

Questions like:

“My personal religious beliefs are important to me”

“My faith affects my life”

“My beliefs make me a better person”

Sign up for the trial month and take the waste-of-time button clicker for yourself.

I might not have a degree in psychology, but some of the questions they ask are VERY shallow and really have no business being on a personality test.

But then what do you expect from someone who is a prostlyzing funamentalist christian?

aaron says:

Re: Need I say more?

It’s amazing to me how a rather humorous brief about eHarmony’s CEO struggles degenerated into an anti-christian rant. Nicely done, Bobby. Definitely (not) feeling the love in your post there. For people who have a faith that makes a difference in their life, those questions are very relevant as they seek out a compatible partner.

Sara says:

Re: Need I say more?

Dear Bobby T.

I totally agree with you!

After I took the time to fill out Eharmony survey they told me they could not find me a match! There must have been other happy, successful people in there that did not go to church. Or was it that I am white and check marked that I would date other races?

Instead of owning a internet dating service, the bigot/evangelist that owns this site should own a segregated country club instead.

SAINT PETER WILL BE HAVING A LONG TALK WITH MR. BIGOT OUTSIDE THE GATES, DURING HIS ATTEMPT AT A MEMBERSHIP TO HIS FINAL DESTINATION!

JazzE says:

Good grief.

Well put aaron, and to take it a step further, I would think most people for whom religious faith is not an important aspect of their lives (myself), or those who find it offensive (Bobby), would prefer not to be paired with someone who does have strong religious beliefs.

So, Bobby, you tried the site and quickly realized you don’t like eharmony or its candidate pool. Well, there you go. It’s not for you. Sounds to me like the site is working the way it was intended.

Donna says:

Hi. Probably sth. I should say…well, am not a christian at all, an Asian living in Singapore, matched with more than 100 people during the last two months since registration — althought those questionaires almost had driven me crazy…

Do they tend to do that on purpose? I meant, try to get your truest part by making you tired? I don’t know.

But anyhow, I feel that site is more suitable for people who are aware about thier own philosophy and values instead of casual dates seekers.

michael jay says:

EHarmony

It worked for us and I recommend it to everyone who is seriously looking for a relationship! Actually, whether you see someone up front or not is controlled by the person registering. You are right, its about serious relationships and not casual dating. I think the profile is great! It weeds out the players and, I think, tends to draw out more of the truth that not. Though, of course, so many live in blockage of Truth that they don’t even know themselves.

My wife and I have been together for 5 years and the matching process has worked beautifully for us. Yes, even the “religious” questions (non traditional Christian) matched us well. So well that the presence of conflict in our 5 years together has been almost non existent.

Sounds like the name callers (bigot) etc. are pretty bigoted! How shocking. How politically correct and controlled. What ever happened to liberty? I get to choose what I like and you get to hate who you like? Have at it friend! Take care and perhaps consider the old adage, “Hating another is like taking a poison and hoping THEY will die!” We each suffer and die from our own self administered poisons. I think it was said many centuries ago, “As you sow, you reap.” “Measure and it will be measured unto you.” “As a wo(man) thinkest in their heart.”

You are held in a Blessing,
michael

Michelle says:

LOL..

My personality profile I did with this made me out to be “The most caring loving person, that was intelligent and willing to listen to others, blah blah.. that would be great for anyone” but it says “Sorry 1 in 5 people we cannot find matches for. and you’re one of those 5, so we can’t help you.” and this is outrageous I made myself out to be the perfect house wife, so there goes your “Find a wife” website.. It’s crap.

Michelle says:

Lemme just add this:

“We are so convinced of the importance of creating compatible matches to help people establish happy, lasting relationships that we sometimes choose not to provide service rather than risk an uncertain match.”

Hah. Because it’s a free “find e-match” service right now? I’m hurt, I hope they’re happy. What if that “uncertain match” is actually the love of my life! They screwed me! /hurt

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...