Scams

Scams

by Mike Masnick





When You Lie About Your Identity, Make Sure The Identity You Take Isn't Worse Than Your Own

from the a-public-service-announcement dept

Back in 2003, we wrote about an identity theft scam that backfired when the identity the guy stole turned out to be worse than his own. In appears that a similar situation has happened again. This time, a car was pulled over by police and the driver was found to have a suspended license. The police asked the passenger in the car to drive the car away, as the original driver was taken into custody. However, when they asked the passenger to show his license, he said he left it at home... and then gave someone else's name as his own. The only problem? The guy whose name he gave is a wanted felon (via Fark). The police then arrested him and he had to explain that he wasn't really who he said he was, and proved it with ID which really was in his pocket. It turns out that the guy had no outstanding warrants himself... but now has been charged with giving false statements to police. So, once again, as a public service announcement to identity thieves: it's probably not a good idea if your stolen identities are in more trouble than you are.

16 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. by Duh! - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 3:49am

    Hahahaha. What an idiot.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. by Anonymous Coward - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 4:20am

    o.O smart enough to be an identity thief, not smart enough to be careful about it. >___>;;;;

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. haha

    by billy - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 5:01am

    serves em right, the jerks

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. by You never know - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 5:02am

    Oh this is a clasic! If you're going to lie throu your teeth to a cop, make sure they are not still setting in the bathroom sink!!!!!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Lying

    by Casper - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 7:05am

    You have to be smart to lie. Of course if you get away with it, you don't end up in the news....

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. Future Sting Operations

    by bt garner - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 7:54am

    Wonder how long it will be before the police (FBI, etc) start to leak known bad information.. .might be easier to catch those guys if the IDs that are using are also "wanted."

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. Identity or avatar?

    by Newob - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 9:22am

    People have a strange way of thinking about identity. IMHO, my identification cards, social security number, and all the other names and numbers that identify me are not *me*, they are avatars of myself. Just as I am not that character or spaceship in a video game that I play, I am not my identification. Characters and roles you play in real life are just avatars, like the characters and roles you play in games. Knowing that, no one can steal my identity.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. Re: Identity or avatar?

    by Anonymous Coward - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 10:25am

    LMAO. Problem solved. Next!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. by Anonymous Coward - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 10:34am

    You are not legally required to identify yourself to the police. Just say no.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. by Captain Obvious - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 10:36am

    Thank god I read this article about someone lying to a police officer on TechDirt. Nothing screams technology like a story about giving false identity to a cop.

    Mike, this is either another slow news day, or you've reached a new low.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. >_>

    by theOngman - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 10:39am

    that is fail

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. Re:

    by Anonymous Coward - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 10:43am

    You ARE legally required to identify yourself to an officer of the law. failure to do so may result in up to 72 hours in jail, at which time they must charge you with something, or let you go.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  13. Re:

    by traveler - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 10:44am

    Yeap, The coward is absolutely right.... You have the right to remain silent, and hire an attorney, then pay him $225/hr. to tell them who you are! This after you've given the officer enough probable cause to suspect that you're hiding something, and get a search warrant to search your car, and get you finger printed into the system, etc. Brilliant advice!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  14. by anonymous coward - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 11:17am

    banruptcy and dui, i'm just hoping someone tries to steal my identity. good luck with that!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  15. Re: Captain Obvious

    by Charles Griswold - Mar 20th, 2007 @ 4:58pm

    Thank god I read this article about someone lying to a police officer on TechDirt. Nothing screams technology like a story about giving false identity to a cop.

    Mike, this is either another slow news day, or you've reached a new low.

    Not to be obvious or anything, but identity theft largely is a tech issue. In a non-networked world, identity theft wouldn't be nearly the problem that it is.

    BTW, nothing screams "I have nothing valuable to do with my time" like deliberately misconstruing the theme of an article (identity theft gone wrong vs. lying to cops) and then making a really lame attempt at sarcasm.


    Anyway, kudos to Mike for this article. It's nice to see the lighter side of tech issues once in a while. :-)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  16. by |333173|3|_||3 - Mar 21st, 2007 @ 5:02am

    releasing information for identity theives to use of suspects would not help catch the original suspect, unless they reported to the police to complian, even if it would help catch the identity thieves. Also, releasing personal details of suspect which could be used to identify him might be a viollation of the presumption of innocence. After all, reporters are not supposed to reveal the street address of a suspect whose trial they are reporting on.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It