Overhype

Overhype

by Mike Masnick





Security Firms Discover New Risk: People Say Stuff On Blogs And Social Network Sites!

from the oh-no! dept

Security firms always seem to be looking for new "risks" to hype up, some more ridiculous than others. The latest is that some security firm is claiming that "web 2.0" is a big security risk because people use things like blogs and social networks to communicate, and they might just communicate some top secret product plans or something. Other than that, the fear isn't exactly clear, though, you have to wonder if security firms released similar overhyped fear mongering reports when the telephone first became popular. You know that employees can leak information over the phone too? Fax machines are a big security hole as well. And, let's not forget that huge security hole known as actually talking to non-employees face-to-face. Something must be done!

13 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. by Overcast - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 8:40am

    What a new concept....

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. by Mr. Derp - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 8:48am

    In other news, the sun is big and hot.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. Re:

    by Anonymous Coward - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 8:50am

    Yes, but not at night!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Well that's dumb

    by TheDock22 - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 9:00am

    Most companies make you sign a confidentiality agreement. If you leak information, not only can you be fired but you can be sued. So...why did the security firms waste all this money again?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Re: Well that's dumb

    by Magicdiablo - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 9:09am

    Because they have nothing else better to do with all that money. Who wants to spend money on research on bigger and better things, like a better security protocol, or teaching "Americans"to speak English? Eh, we don't need that. Yet another reason stupidity rules the world.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. Re: Re: But not at night

    by youhadmeatyes - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 9:27am

    Niiiiiice! LOL!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. The opposite of openness

    by Ray - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 9:45am

    This in the same month that Wired published an eye-opening look at why true openness in the forms of blogs and the like may be the key to companies successfully using those tools to connect with customers and stakeholders. More companies should have the courage to operate in the open. The whole notion of proprietary knowledge is so 20th century.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. BREAKING NEWS!!!!

    by SkippyTMut - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 9:51am

    Security Firms gives away own huge money making secret!!!!!!

    The secret: Get people all worried about stuff like blogs and social networks so they will pay us to "help" them

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. Re: Re:

    by Anonymous Coward - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 10:04am

    So since you can't see it, it is no longer big or hot?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. Re:

    by Anonymous Coward - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 10:36am

    Actually, the sun is still big and hot at night. You just can't see it.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. Our Comrade, the Sun

    by Elohssa - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 11:03am

    I have learned through sources better not named, that the sun visits foreign nations at night, some of whom are COMMUNIST!

    That's right, while your children are in their beds, dreaming the AMERICAN DREAM, that leftist pinko commie sun is shining down on those heathen bastards!

    Something must be done!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. Security Risks

    by Charles Griswold - Mar 28th, 2007 @ 4:19pm

    Next thing you know, they will be saying that the next big internet security risk is people, because they talk with each other. :-P

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  13. by |333173|3|_||3 - Mar 29th, 2007 @ 8:55am

    The next security risk is computers. If all teh computers were eradicated, there would be no more spam, no more viruses, and the worlds computer networks would be virtually secure.If all devices which could be reprogrammed except by hardware modification were removed, all malware would forever be killed off.

    Teaching Americans english is a bad idea, it would be better to let the two languages go thier seperate ways. That way, when the Americans are trying to use a language which is only bareley intelligible (like Portugese and Spanish, if you speak one you can vaugely understand the other), then people will recognise that the languages are happliy separating. Local content laws throughout the commonwealth, conservative press, and anti-Americanism will all help that divergence by reducing the flow of words adn usages from one to the other. Creating a perfect machine translator would be the ideal soltion, since this would allow the same site to show English and American text, with only one set of writing. the use of different US and British versions of books also helps this.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It