Got A Good Credit Score? Rent It To Someone In Need
from the let's-trade dept
One of the common consequences for victims of identity theft is that they can see their credit scores get damaged, and because the big credit agencies don't offer much help in monitoring and fixing this, it can be a major hassle to get the problem resolved. Barry Ritholtz to an interesting story about a different kind of fraud, whereby people with good credit scores can sell their credit histories to people who want their own score boosted. Basically, the law states that people are allowed to add an unlimited number of individuals to their credit card accounts; it's mainly intended for parents who want to put their kids on the account. But, various websites have emerged to take advantage of this loophole, enabling people with bad credit histories to improve their score by getting access to a good credit history. It's not clear how widespread this actually is, but it pretty clearly violates the whole point of a credit score, since it's supposed to give the lender some idea of how reliable the borrower is. Fair Isaac, the company that developed the FICO score, says it's currently in talks with the FTC to stop the practice. The question, then, is whether shutting down this loophole will do the trick, or whether credit history brokers will simply find another loophole.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
by RandomThoughts on Apr 25th, 2007 @ 5:24pm
This has to be the stupidest idea I have ever heard. When you sign on the dotted line for a credit card or any other line of credit, you become financially responsible. What does that mean? If the person doesn’t pay the bill, you have to. The deadbeat might not have a car that can be repossessed, but the person signing for them would.
Your credit score could be the least of your worries.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Money is Debt by Republican Gun on Apr 25th, 2007 @ 5:42pm
Money is just a unit of account. It accounts for your worth. If you spend more than you are worth you go into debt and become a slave to the lender.
I think Prosper.com has a better business model in where groups loan to each other.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Random Thoughts is Right by Jessie on Apr 25th, 2007 @ 5:49pm
My father, after being screwed over financially by my four older siblings, wouldn't co-sign his name on a dog permit, and I don't blame him. He gave my deadbeat brother his old car, and he never bothered to register the car in his own name. My brother got into a fatal car accident, and my father was the one who got sued. Even though he was able to establish that he wasn't the owner of the car, it took an attorney and tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees. The bitch of it is that the accident was determined to be the fault of a third driver, who had a seizure behind the wheel. You really have to be insane to put your name on anything that doesn't belong to you.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Stupid Idea? nahhh by Ryan on Apr 25th, 2007 @ 5:53pm
Where's the harm in having someone else on your credit cards, PROVIDED they do not actually HAVE the credit cards, and you have the account setup so only you can get to it? I recall reading there are some rudimentary safeguards in place. Easy way to make some $$$
Besides, when cards such as https://www.firstpremierbankgold.com/ exist, they deserve it.
(Read the fees and the fine print on that AWESOME deal!)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Mandie on Apr 25th, 2007 @ 6:00pm
I don't think they are adding them as an actual authorized user. I believe that they would, if they were smart about this, just be adding them without giving them any way to actually use the card. This way they would benifit from the score, but not be able to mess someone else's scored up by not paying.
I do get how this is not a good thing for the mortgage companies though. It does not show proof that they are a good credit risk. Who knows, they might actually continue to do well, but there is always the chance that they could mess up.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Fair Isaac is talking out of both sides of its mou by Anonymous Coward on Apr 25th, 2007 @ 6:05pm
What a ridiculous situation when Fair Isaac starts complaining to the FCC about this "loophole" when its own system is a closed standard that nobody understands.
In essence, they should either play by private company rules, or play by public entity rules. This is supreme garbage and the FTC should tell them to take a walk if they don't open up the way FICO scores work.
More to the point, the credit reporting agencies and industry as a whole need to be revamped. They're out of control, allow people's lives to be ruined on a whim without due reciprocal recourse, and don't reward good credit (i.e. early payment should make your credit better, not just late payment making your credit worse).
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Anon is Right - FICO is communist by FICO is communist on Apr 25th, 2007 @ 7:52pm
Fair Issac is a proprietary, private system that ruins peoples lives and won't divulge their math. FICO scores are supposed to be statistical predictors - but won't divulge the formula. How can one succeed if they don't know the rules of the game?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Random Thoughts is Right by Anonymous Coward on Apr 25th, 2007 @ 8:19pm
Why does the owner of a car have anything to do with who gets sued for crashing it? Does that mean I am immune from prosecution when I destroy things with a car, as long as it belongs to someone else?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The System by bob on Apr 25th, 2007 @ 8:24pm
Entropy is a wonderful thing, it's about time this very old and unreliable system is dismantled.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Random Thoughts is Right by GregD on Apr 25th, 2007 @ 9:34pm
The general thought is, once someone is in an accident, you SUE!!
Sue the driver, sue the owner, sue the manufacturer, sue the innocent bystander who saw it happen, heck, sue the city because they built the road!!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Stupid Idea? nahhh by mkam on Apr 26th, 2007 @ 5:20am
Wow. Kind of off topic, but who in there right mind would 'apply' for one of those bad boys. $72 for the privilege of applying?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
It's killing the concept of a credit score by Anonymous Jerk on Apr 26th, 2007 @ 5:30am
I made some bad choices when I was younger (18-21), and my credit is still recovering (some 3 years later, lol). However, as stated in the article, this kills the concept of even HAVING a credit score. Now lending institutions will probably retaliate by making it even TOUGHER to get a loan (lease/mortgage/etc.), meaning even fewer people will have 'good enough credit' to qualify, and the cycle repeats.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: by SmartAssWhizKid on Apr 26th, 2007 @ 6:23am
"This has to be the stupidest idea I have ever heard. When you sign on the dotted line for a credit card or any other line of credit, you become financially responsible. What does that mean? If the person doesn’t pay the bill, you have to. The deadbeat might not have a car that can be repossessed, but the person signing for them would.
Your credit score could be the least of your worries.
Did you even read the article? The person is only using the _credit score_, to boost his/her credit, not the account.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
It is ironic.... by Wizard Prang on Apr 26th, 2007 @ 8:39am
...that to get a "credit" score you have to get into DEBT!
If I had a million dollars in the bank, would that affect my credit score?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
how? by Andrew Klossner on Apr 26th, 2007 @ 3:31pm
When I put my college-age daughter on my credit card, I called the bank and asked them to send me another piece of plastic with my credit card number and her name. They don't have her social security number, so this is doing nothing for her credit history.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The good old days by Ric on May 22nd, 2007 @ 5:52pm
What happened to building a reputation with a bank? Back in the day, that was how you got lines of credit. One would open an account with a bank, and after several years of doing business together, one would be considered worthy of a loan. Are all banks off that system entirely?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: The good old days by Wizard Prang on May 31st, 2007 @ 7:35am
What happened to building a reputation with a bank?
Banks stopped dealing in reputations and started dealing in numbers.
Also banks became more centralized - the "manager" often cannot write a loan without permission from Head Office... which is often in a different State.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: The good old days by Melly on Jun 7th, 2007 @ 11:02am
Yes.. I own my own business and have been with my current bank about 3 years, they wouldn't give me a fly of their wall to save grace. I could move my accounts, but what is the use, other banks in the area are just as bad or worse.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by C'mon let's be real on Jun 7th, 2007 @ 5:17pm
The real question is "Why would someone with a GOOD credit score want to sell it to someone? Other than a few dollars What's in it for them. I thought you had to be Smart and Savvy in order to have GOOD credit anyway.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Soudns good, but... on Jun 17th, 2007 @ 12:22pm
A Chicago Tribune article reported some companies pating as much as $10 Grand to rent your good credit history for 90 days so others could get boost their scores.
But does this activity involve inquirires into your credit history (which can imapact your score)? To how many customers are they selling your good history (1 inquiry for each customer) in that 90 days? And, what does your good score look like 6 weeks later?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
sounds good, but by Heather on Jun 20th, 2007 @ 1:38pm
I was wondering the exact same thing about how the inquiries would affect the person with good credit who is loaning it out. I read a story about a guy online who did this with a total of 19 authorized users on his various accounts. That article did not address the inquiry topic either.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Anonymous Coward on Nov 1st, 2007 @ 12:40pm
FICO has been screwing people and ruining lives for years. Is what some naïve kid does when he’s 18 and doesn’t fully understand credit and scams that some less reputable credit card companies run really mean that by the time they are 24 and much wiser to the way of the world he won’t repay his debts now that he is out of college and has a decent job? No it doesn’t. Plain and simple. Now that said person has been screwed by ruining their “credit” with a couple cards that took years to repay with the ridiculous interest rates and fees can’t buy a house or rent a decent apartment even though they haven’t messed up in years. It’s ridiculous. The whole system just sucks. There should be a much lower statute of limitations and time frame in which they judge your ability to repay. If in the past two to four years you haven’t had a single credit blemish I think it’s safe to say you’ve gotten your act together and are a much more responsible person. I’m glad someone finally figured out a way to stick to these jackasses. The whole system needs to be brought down ala Fight Club.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: by Christina on Feb 18th, 2008 @ 1:17am
ur using there score not there info I guess u didnt understand what u read
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment