Can You Patent How You Spin An Advertising Sign On A Street Corner?

from the yikes dept

Even with the Supreme Court helping to put some common sense back into the patent system, there are still plenty of people who clearly want to stretch the purpose of the patent system for beyond its constitutional purpose. The latest is highlighted by Justin Levine at Against Monopoly. He points to a fascinating and amusing LA Times article about the rough-and-tumble, cut-throat world of street corner sign spinning. You’ve probably seen the folks, standing on street corners with big cardboard signs, advertising homes for sale or a new tanning salon or whatever. Apparently, it’s a big business and a very competitive one. However, the point Justin highlights shows to the extreme it’s reached:

Aarrow keeps dozens of moves in a “trick-tionary,” which only a handful of people have seen, said co-founder Mike Kenny. The company records spinners’ movements and sends them in batches to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. “We have to take our intellectual property pretty seriously,” he said.

Read that again. The company is trying to protect the way street corner advertisers spin their signs. Thomas Jefferson is rolling over in his grave.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Can You Patent How You Spin An Advertising Sign On A Street Corner?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
38 Comments
Anonymous Poster (profile) says:

A whole new kind of stupid

“I’m not familiar with this type of thing I’m seeing.” — Calculon, Futurama

Jeez, I know you have to do your best to protect your intellectual property in this day and age, but attempting to patent THE WAY YOU SPIN A SIGN ON THE STREET? Does that mean (assuming the patents go through, and if there’s a just and loving God, they won’t) if someone accidentally duplicates one of this company’s “tricktionary” movements, they could get sued into oblivion?

That’s a level of idiocy I don’t think I’ve ever witnessed before. From now on, I’m calling all idiotic patents like this Sign-Spinner Patents.

redhammy says:

It'll never work

Don’t worry, it’ll never work. I’ve been trying to patent my trademark 4-finger-flick for years now with no success. I’ve since come to my senses and decided against the patent route. If other street advertisement athletes want to duplicate my moves, let them. I just hope they stretch first because I don’t wanna get sued if they injure themselves.

/not really.

BillGod says:

wha wha what?

The more I hear of these the more I cannot believe they are true? I keep telling myself that there is NO WAY that stuff like this happens.. then I hit a reality check..

1. Lawyers get paid to make laws
2. Lawyers get paid to enforce those laws
3. Lawyers get paid to find loop-holes in the laws lawyers got paid to create..

It makes perfect sense.

TheDock22 says:

Re: wha wha what?

1. Lawyers get paid to make laws
2. Lawyers get paid to enforce those laws
3. Lawyers get paid to find loop-holes in the laws lawyers got paid to create..

Actually, politicians and congress get paid to make laws. The police and judges get paid to enforce those laws. Lawyers do get paid to find loop-holes, but a “loop-hole” is just a matter of interpretation of said laws…made by congress…

Mike Brown (user link) says:

Reflects more on reporting than patenting...

“The company records spinners’ movements and sends them in batches to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.”

Just how did this morph into “opening the floodgates for ridiculous patents” requiring the government to shut anything down?

I see five interpretations of this rather vague description in a newspaper article:

1. The article said they send something in batches to the US patent AND TRADEMARK office. As the name implies, that office handles applications for both patents and trademark registrations. Perhaps the company hopes to claim trademark rights in particular methods of spinning signs. They’re saying, in essence, “if you see someone spin a sign in this particular way, that means this advertising comes from Aarow”. If the pattern of spinning does, in fact, serve a source-indicating function (that is, only Aarow’s employees use a particular way of waving a sign) this would be proper, and no different than registering a rotating pattern of lights in the sky as a trademark (Ballantyne’s searchlights, reg. 2323892), or “THE AUDIO AND VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF A COIN SPINNING ON A HARD SURFACE,” (Northwestern Bank, reg. 641872), a particular sound (the Tarzan yell for action figures, reg. 2210506), or anything else which serves to distinguish your goods/services from someone else’s.

2. They really are filing patent applications to protect specific sets of sign movements as methods of advertising. I’d tend to agree that such a patent would be sort of useless, but methods are patentable. The claim could be something like “A method of advertising by a person on a street corner comprising the step of doing a backbend on one hand while spinning a sign above the person’s head.” At a minimum cost of $1,500 in filing and issue fees alone, per patent, that would seem to be a very expensive way of “protecting” a very narrow method. If they’re really trying to patent a batch at a time, that could get very expensive very quickly. If they are doing this, none of the applications has yet been published and no patents have issued, at least not assigned to Aarow.

3. The company is completely clueless, and thinks that sending batches of descriptions of moves to the USPTO somehow protects their Intellectual Property. Never discount ignorance or stupidity as an explanation.

4. The company (or the reporter) has confused the USPTO with the Copyright Office, and are sending their “Trick-tionary” with its writeups in for registration of copyright, in the belief that this somehow protects the moves themselves. Interestingly, this might actually work – choreography is one of the things which can be protected by copyright, and you can register a claim to the copyright in a dance or pantomime, so long as it’s “fixed in a tangible medium of expression”. Suing for violation of copyright in one of the moves “fixed” in the “Trick-tionary” could be a fascinating copyright suit indeed…

or

5. The reporter is completely clueless and has absolutely no idea what intellectual property, the USPTO, or anything else is.

I vote for number 5, personally.

Supra (user link) says:

Number 4

I agree with number Mike Brown’s #4. I think it could potentially be copyrighted.

Bikram Yoga was recently copyrighted, for example. Even though all the movements are in the public domain, a particular sequence of unprotected public domain “facts” can be copyrighted as an original “selection and arrangement.” If the sign-spinners have a particular order of moves, I think it could be done!

Anonymous Coward says:

taking the possibility of confusing copyright and trademark aside, this brings up a few interesting points: if you do a youtube search for sign spinners, some of what these guys are doing are pretty cool, and yes different then your typical sign holders. Might they be covered under the same protections dancers and…cheerleaders/dance squads/baton twirlers get for their moves? I’d say its reasonable. However, I’d like to see a high school cheerleading squad sue AArrow for infringement, since I;ve seen many of these exact same moves performed during half time shows!!!! also, that might qualify as prior art.
The second issue is that if an employee of Aarrow comes up with his own routine, and aarrow “IP’s” it, then the employee can never perform that same “trick” if he goes to work for another sign company, since the creation of an employee as part of his job belongs to an employeer. Maybe these spinners will form a union and add their own protections to future sign spinning employment contracts?

Morell E. Mullins says:

related copyright contention

A law professor at UA-Fayetteville apparently has an article coming out in a reputable law review contending that your emails, and this one, are protected by copyright and nobody can forward your emails, copy them, etc. (I take on position on the sanity of this, although from a strictly legalistic standpoint, it might have merit, arguably.) STORY FOLLOWS

According to local pundit Pat Lynch: Associated Press reports a law professor at the
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville believes
forwarding emails violates long-standing laws
protecting letter writers back to the days of quill
pens. Assistant Professor Ned Snow argues in an
article to be published in the Kansas Law Review that
common law protects text message and e-mail writers
from having their words forwarded or published on Web
sites for public view.

Javarod says:

Actually ifn this is the group I’ve seen out here in Phoenix, I’d almost be willing to let them have this one. I’m a taxi driver, and it takes a lot to get my attention, and these guys manage it. Picture a guy twirling a sign roughly 3 to 4ft long by about 18 to 24in like a baton. Its not only impressive, it looks like they’ve gotten quite a bit of training, why not perfectly choreographed, they’ve clearly trained as opposed to those people who just stand there and wave them occasionally (or the guy holding one with one hand while sitting in a lawn chair).

Grey M. (user link) says:

patents

well you guys hav know idea what your talking about i am a sign spinner and if you can write a book you hav the right to patent it becuase its your words and your creativity. we use our creativity to make tricks to be better advertisers/performers. so it only makes sence that you can patent a trick that you make up. you hav every right to it just like you would if you wrote a book.

bruno (user link) says:

intellectual property

I’m an Accounts Manager for AArrow. You all need to get your heads straight. This IS a competitive business. There are companies in CA that claim to have started from scratch with their own innovative idea – OUR innovative idea. I’m sure no one will get sued for accidentally performing one of our moves…but those who try to steal our work deserve to be sued into oblivion. First off, if you think that this is ridiculous, you haven’t seen this craft at its height. There is a great deal of skill, talent, and practice that goes into perfecting these tricks, not to mention the numerous injuries one sustains until acheiving success. Many of our tricks are so complicated that anyone trying to steal them wouldn’t be able to – but since we DO have an exclusive training and trick system, it’s important to ensure that no one leaves our company and takes our moves with them. If you were a software engineer and you wrote an amazing line of code, trained your coworkers on how to include that line in their own programs, and then watched as they took YOUR code to other companies, shouldn’t you be entitled to legal protection?

Mr. Poopy says:

Waah waah waah

I will enjoy seeing just how many different lawsuits come about regarding this issue, since I’m holding patents on all possible ways to sue. Tons of money will thus roll my way, but then I’ll lose all of it to some other time-blessed brainiac who holds patents on ways to collect money.

Jeez bruno, get a life. Some things are more important than being the one to say “I came up with that”. I sure don’t remember streetcorner breakdancers suing each other over their “unique” moves. By your logic, doesn’t the very first homeless person who came up with the ubiquitous “will work for food” sign deserve some kind of credit?

Your problem relates to being greedy and selfish, not artsy or innovative. Have a great day. 🙂

Human Directional (user link) says:

It's not practical.... It will never work

I’m sign spinner. I do it on the weekends mainly for extra income. I really don’t see how anyone could patent the moves. The patent means nothing without enforcement and who is actually going to bother to stand around and watch spinners to see if they are violating ownership rights. Very very odd. But interesting article. If you ever see me in OC honk .. my bumper sticker reads Sign Spinners do it with Coroplast Signs.

Casonova84 (user link) says:

Sign Spinning is a New Sport!

Its as simple as this: AArrow Sign Spinning is a new extreme sport that interlocks street performing with advertising.

We’re not trying to sue ANYONE. We’re simply saying this, “Look, We (AArrow) have taken this (form of outdoor advertising) to a whole new level. A level that cannot be compared. We are the elite of the elite when it comes to “Sign Spinning”. like the bilderberg group (if you dont know who they are, then keep drinking your flouride water.)

Its like this:
In martial arts you have various movements and techniques that clarify a specific type of martial art. for example, if you watch any fight or mma videos and you yourself know certain types of martial arts, then you yourself can say, “hey he just did a jump hook kick.” but, To the untrained eye, noone knows wtf that is. however, you do because you have the experience to know exactly what it is. maybe you took tae kwon do and thats why you know… Well sign spinning is exactly like a martial art in the sense that if you dont do it or study it, then you wont know wtf is going on.

AArrow just wants to copyright its specific style of sign spinning.

for this reason you wont see knockoff companies doing our stylistic moves. they’ll have to make up their own stuff. you catch me?

you dont see kung fu experts copyrighting a kick, no. but what you so see is a clear definition of that kicks origin. the style, the technique, and the person/s responsible for it.

We (AArrow) know that people are going to try to copy us, we dont mind, we’re just clarifying Our own style of Sign Spinning,

We are simply trying to protect what we do.

Its like Velcro man, it was actually micro loop/hook technology that makes it what it is. Who cares, because when you buy Velcro your paying for a marketed brand that secured and controlled what it created. Velcro isnt saying u cant make micro loop/hook technology, but what they are saying is that you damn sure better not call it Velcro.

thats America for you, From Freedom to Fascism.

Sign Spinners (user link) says:

Sign Spinners

I’m sorry Casanova, but I don’t follow you at all. First you say you won’t sue anyone, then you say you want to protect what’s yours, then you say you don’t want anyone else using the name of your style which seems to be unknown anyway so I’m unsure as to why you would feel threatened by this.

Exactly what is the name of the style you are trying to protect and who on Earth cares about the name anyway?

I bet you one trade marked spin that the only reason for declaring property rights is for the followup publicity. 😉

Elias Roman Armendariz says:

Probable reasoning

One reasoning for patenting the moves is in fact to protect the aarrow method from being duplicated. There are in fact companies started from ex-spinners. Spacewalk is an example. Also as a sign spinner I’ve been offered deals to “share” my knowledge of Aarrow. But to some good thinking from Aarrow, I’m not allowed to disclose any information like that legally.

It’s the next big thing and everyone wants to copy it. It only makes sense to protect what you created. Selfish and Greedy? Isn’t that the point of business and marketing? It’s called competition, and patenting what you started gives you a huge advantage. Why wouldn’t you want to do something like that?

As for the opening the flood gates. That’s taking it to an extreme. Just like saying well if gays can get married soon people and animals can get married. It’s just absurd.

Now patenting tricks might seem odd, it’s purpose isn’t to sue everyone who does the trick. If someone directly stole *with given proof* the “group of tricks” then action can be taken. Also if an ex-spinner used his knowledge to create a company or just became and independent spinner, he’d have to wait a certain amount of years before doing so. This isn’t some random bull shit thinking. These steps have been thought out carefully. Unlike most of these comments. This has been reviewed by lawyers, patent makers, and other intelligent individuals. So before you speak your view, do you really think your logic out does theirs?

SIgn Flip (profile) says:

Makes No Sense

We have developed a community called http://www.signflip.com. We intend to create a community of people who enjoy the art of sign spinning. We think of Sign Spinning as an art form just like break dancing or martial arts. The performers at Aarrow would like to copyright the art form and we think that is interesting, but are confused about their motives. We at SignFlip promote everyones ability to practice and perform this art without regulations and rules. If someone decides to go out on their own and find business for themselves, Aarrow is saying they can’t. We cannot condone this behavior. There are no copyrights or patents on MMA moves and fighting styles. There are no copyrights or patents on skateboarding tricks or bike tricks. The explanations written here by Aarrow reps worry us and lead us at SignFlip to believe they will use these actions to monopolize the market. We at SignFlip will be watching this situation unfold.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt needs your support! Get the first Techdirt Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...