Email

Email

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
data leak, email, p2p

Companies:
mediadefender



MediaDefender Internal Email Leak Confirms Plans To Launch Honeypot File Sharing Network

from the oops dept

Back in July, there was a report that MediaDefender, a company that works for the MPAA and RIAA polluting file sharing networks with fake files, was working on a fake file sharing network that would trick users into downloading some spyware that could then be used to send details back to the entertainment industry for use in various lawsuits. After the news broke, MediaDefender denied that this was the intended purpose of the project, and said it was just an internal project that was accidentally made public. Speaking of internal stuff accidentally made public, late Friday the news began to spread that a bunch of MediaDefender's internal emails were now available on file sharing systems, and looking through them seems to indicate not only that MediaDefender was spending an awful lot of time on this fake site (called MiiVi.com) but even after it was exposed, the company was still working on it, while trying to find a new name that wouldn't be connected to MediaDefender. Of course, we should point out that hacking MediaDefender to get its internal emails (and phone calls, apparently) is not very smart. It makes MediaDefender start to look like the victim and opens up a very real (and reasonable) possibility of a lawsuit against whoever got (and then leaked) the emails. MediaDefender was a company that would have collapsed on itself eventually anyway. There's no reason to help push them over the edge -- especially using illegal or unethical means.

21 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 2:16am

    Juicy!

    by AC

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 2:21am

    MPAA and RIAA?

    What are these things of which you speak?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 2:30am

    Re: MPAA and RIAA?

    by Anonymous Coward

    its the MAFIAA

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 2:56am

    Re: MPAA and RIAA?

    by GoblinJuice

    Mr. Hands is worse than TubGirl. =P

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 2:57am

    Re: MPAA and RIAA?

    by GoblinJuice

    Mr. Hands is worse than TubGirl. =P

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 3:05am

    MediaBlunder

    by John

    Fake files are bad enough (back when I used Kazaa, the ones I hated the most were ones where the chorus section of a song loops repeatedly so that you have to spend a minute trying to figure out if it's the real song or not!), but a fake file sharing site is pretty weak and won't last more than a few days if it ever gets online! In any case, file-sharing between millions of strangers is on it's way out as people discover the merits of private and encrypted file-sharing between friends (ex: GigaTribe)...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 3:18am

    they can't do much for torrents

    by matt

    also, if you read the emails, you'll note that they can't do that much about torrents since poisoning/bad seeds are easy to get around. Also notice that they don't even attempt to stop piratebay (because bad seeds are found there very quickly)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 6:26am
    by Overcast

    Just now...

    I thought for a long time that a few of them already were, LOL. Especially Limewire. Dang, too bad I was wrong!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 8:20am

    dang

    by citizenj

    If you go through the emails, you see just how frickin' bad this is for MediaDefender. I do so hope the mainstream news gets ahold of this one.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 8:41am

    Legallity?

    by LB USNavy

    This almost sounds illegal. I could lawsuit after lawsuit on this. So to put it this in real terms...If someone were to do something illegsl like break into my house, I could then go break into his house and get away with it? Eye for an eye? I think not. Mediadefender definitely went the wrong direction with trying to stop piracy. These companies pay software engineers big bucks to come up with theft prevention techniques. Couldnt they have come up with something a ittle more creative? I mean really?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 10:16am

    Fight Fire with Napalm

    by james Brown

    I say screw the ethics, cheers to whoever leaked the emails, and keep at it. Don't give these bastards an inch.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 10:56am

    Entrapment

    by Ricky Clinch

    Clear and simple case of entrapment. Someone better at it than i am should write a virus that sniffs out one of these fakes and tracks back with the data to infect the MediaDefender computers.

    Maybe even detect and publish the Ports being used by MD to the greater web, I am sure there are lots of folks that can find something to do with them.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  13. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 2:16pm

    Virus

    by scroter

    naw - let them set up the website to download alleged "Illegal" content. This way the public can go after them for copyrighted materials. Either that or someone needs to write a virus that will download something from their site secretly on everyones computers around the world. Could you imagine the traffic and court cases that they would have to pay for for false accusations? Either that or someone needs to write a virus that just downloads illegal crap silently and do the same thing, that would in turn shut everything down I think.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  14. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 4:33pm

    Made the WSJ

    by 4ensic

    Page 1B of the 9-17-07 Wall Street Journal had a good size article on MediaDefender’s leak. Looks like more than just the tech community will know about MD’s problem...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  15. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 6:02pm

    What a joke!

    by Unka Bullshyte

    The Media defender people decide to launch a fake filesharing site and call it...

    MiiVi.com??

    Mii = me
    Vi = #4 = D
    -----------------
    MeeDee

    Oh, suuuuuure! No one will ever figure out who MeeDee is...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  16. Sep 17th, 2007 @ 7:29pm
    by Anonymous Coward

    "Vi = #4 = D"

    Roman numerals aren't your strong point, eh?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  17. Sep 18th, 2007 @ 4:03pm
    by Anonymous Coward

    Awesome.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  18. Sep 19th, 2007 @ 1:57am

    Re:

    LoL seriously.
    You were off by 1 digit.
    I'll let you guess if it's +/-

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  19. Sep 20th, 2007 @ 5:39pm

    MediaDefender

    by Anonymous

    phuck with da b3st di3 lik3 th3 r3st.

    da ball iz in ur c0urt.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  20. Sep 22nd, 2007 @ 12:15pm

    Re: Re:

    by Lifeisdeath

    off by one digit? try 2. VI is 6.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  21. Dec 1st, 2008 @ 4:57am

    Re: Re: Re:

    by tom

    I could then go break into his house and get away with it? Eye for an eye? I think not. Mediadefender definitely went the wrong direction with trying to stop piracy. These companies pay software engineers laptop AC adapters big bucks to come up with theft prevention techniques. Couldnt they have come up with something a ittle more creative? I mean really?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It