Politics

Politics

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
anonymous content, comments, free speech, kentucky



Kentucky Lawmaker Introduces Bill To Make Anonymous Cowards Illegal

from the so-many-problems dept

Just about everyone seems to be submitting the story from last week about a local Kentucky legislator who has put forth a bill to make anonymous comments online illegal. I first saw the story on Digg, but it's been submitted about 30 times already and is starting to show up elsewhere -- sometimes with inflammatory headlines (including the one at Digg). First off, this is for Kentucky only. Second, the chances of the bill getting anywhere are slim to none. Third, even if it does miraculously pass, there is no way that it would be enforceable. In fact, even the guy who introduced the legislation admits as much. Fourth, the bill is clearly unconstitutional, violating our rights to anonymous speech (which has been reaffirmed many times by US courts). Fifth, it goes against section 230 of the CDA in that it puts the blame on service providers for the speech of their users, rather than putting the liability on the users themselves. In other words, while this gets some attention as a ridiculously bad bill, the chance of it actually going anywhere or having any impact at all is virtually nil.

33 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Mar 10th, 2008 @ 9:01pm
  • First Post

    by Anonymous Coward

    So Sue Me ;)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 10th, 2008 @ 9:19pm
  • by Iron Chef

    That makes as much sense as the Boulder Colorado legislator who wants to lock cats indoors and keep them on leashes...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 10th, 2008 @ 9:39pm
  • by Jake

    Very true, Iron Chef. But since I spent nearly ten years being woken up by the family moggies and next-door's tomcat trying to disembowel each other, and have met numerous people on the Internet whom I'd just love to be able to identify -albeit probably not for the reasons this legislator has in mind- I can see why they're attractive in the abstract.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Mar 10th, 2008 @ 10:20pm
    • Re:

      by Iron Chef

      Hi Jake,

      I enjoyed your comments immensely! But I have to ask, have you read the commentary from the legislator?

      Like the efforts of this Kentucky legislator, they could be equated to trying to kill a fly with a jackhammer. Someone’s feelings were hurt. And until it’s realized that the GEN-X crowd inherently doesn’t like criticism, as they were brought up thinking they were “special” (Thanks, Fred Rogers) we’re going to continue infighting.

      Things have changed. The world is becoming more complex and globalized. Someone needs to step up and be the voice of reason.

      Again, this is a societal problem.

      http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2008/mar/09/keeping-kitty-on-a-leash/

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Mar 10th, 2008 @ 11:50pm
      • by Jake

        Heh. I figured that just going by the above article would enable me to give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume he just wants the chance to hunt down every moron he meets online and set their house on fire.
        On a serious note, I'm all in favour of compelling the owners of discussion forums and the like to be more proactive in keeping some measure of order, but the proposals he's putting forward are grossly disproportionate and in direct contradiction to a couple of dozen different laws. If he's serious about this and not pulling some kind of rentaquote publicity stunt, his best bet is to push for an amendment to the CDA compelling service providers to delete posts, ban users and inform the relevant authorities where possible in the event of a criminal offence -but not a civil one- being committed through their site.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 12:27am
        • Re:

          by Iron Chef

          Easily the ideology behind "Wikinomics" by Don Tapscott is that "It will only hurt you if you let it."

          So does it hurt, Jake?

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

          • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 9:55am
          • Re: Re:

            by Jake

            Iron Chef: I don't quite follow you. I'm not saying I'm not thick-skinned enough to handle the odd troll, but I don't see why they should be allowed to get away with distressing the more sensitive and annoying the hell out of everyone else. Nor do I think 'Generation X' are going to grow up without some prodding, and God knows what kind of damage some of the examples I can think of will do when they get old enough to vote.

            (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

            • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 10:18am
            • Re: Re: Re:

              by Jason Still

              Iron Chef: I don't quite follow you. I'm not saying I'm not thick-skinned enough to handle the odd troll, but I don't see why they should be allowed to get away with distressing the more sensitive and annoying the hell out of everyone else. Nor do I think 'Generation X' are going to grow up without some prodding, and God knows what kind of damage some of the examples I can think of will do when they get old enough to vote.


              maybe I'm misreading you, but the last members of generation x have been of voting age for quite some time

              (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

            • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 10:19am
            • Re: Re: Re:

              by Iron Chef

              You win, my friend. :-)

              (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Mar 10th, 2008 @ 10:08pm
  • lol

    hahaha. Mike, I love the topic. Only regular readers of the site I believe get it. But here is what I dont understand, why spent the money to attempt to pass such ridiculous laws and to what purpose. And more so, is that tax payer money being used to do such things?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 10th, 2008 @ 10:36pm
  • by It Wasnt me

    wanted to post as "Anonymous Coward" but 1st poster beat me to it :(

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 10th, 2008 @ 11:13pm
  • by Anonymous Coward

    haha

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 10th, 2008 @ 11:33pm
  • by Anonymous Coward

    politicos like to push bills they know won't fly, if they know it'll generate headlines. That's how they maintain name recognition. Bad legislation uses up term time and is far easier to craft than good legislation.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 10th, 2008 @ 11:34pm
  • by Anonymous Coward

    That's it I'm boycotting Kentucky. No more Bourbon, Chicken and horse races.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 10th, 2008 @ 11:35pm
  • by Anonymous Coward

    I bet they support King George

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 12:42am
  • Kentucky Lawmaker

    by Known Coward

    He can go fly a kite.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 1:36am
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Bite me Kentucky

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 1:49am
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Don't they have anything better to do? Like inbreeding... bestiality... something else?

    Those wacky Kentuckians. When will they learn?

    ~Ju don know who I am.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 2:49am
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Wow! the home of the brave and the home of the free. Will they try to ban proxy's next? Go after servers NOT in their Sate or the US for that matter?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 2:49am
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Wow! the home of the brave and the home of the free. Will they try to ban proxy's next? Go after servers NOT in their Sate or the US for that matter?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 2:55am
  • We pay these people to do what?

    by Michael G.

    It just amazes me that we pay, and some of you elect, these people to sit up there and waste time on bills that haven't a chance be passed. Days, weeks, maybe months to come up with something that even he knew was a waste of time when we're all about to pay $4.00 a gallon for gas with no end in site.

    Signed: Senator Whistle Dick

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 3:34am
  • How about no anonymous voice votes in Congress

    by Dave Feustel

    If we're going to ban anonymous internet access, how about
    banning also anonymous voice votes in Congress so we know
    how each representative votes (or not) on every bill. No
    more unrecorded voice votes!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 3:53am
  • Weelll, I think them fellers in Kin-tucky...

    by GeneralEmergency

    ...oughter be aspending less time afrettin'bout the dang internets and more time aworryin'bout the dang shortage of first cousins in the bluegrass state.



    (OK, I admit, that one was harsh.)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 5:50am
  • as a kentuckian...

    by Jason Still

    As someone born and raised in western KY and a current resident of Louisville, I'd like to apologize to everyone for this guy's foolishness as well as pretty much everything more than about 35 miles east of Louisville (especially Lexington and specifically the University of KY, anyone who's attended it, thought about attending it, or been a fan of their sports teams). If we give you bourbon will you forget about that half of the state and forgive us?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 6:40am
  • by Overcast

    So then I would lie about who I am?

    Would 'Overcast' qualify as 'non-anonymous' or do I have to use my REAL name?

    I guess someone pissed him off on a blog.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 6:52am
  • yuh

    by ME

    Kind of like all that illegal pr0n.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 6:58am
  • Sigh...

    by Neal

    As if Kentuckians weren't mocked enough for their stupidity now we've got lawmakers who'd consider themselves proud to be dumber than a fifth grader.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 9:19am
  • Kentucky Jelly

    by James

    Call up the 800# on the KY bottle and tell them that "Kentucky" Jelly just doesn't taste right (bonus points if you use a thick southern accent).

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 11th, 2008 @ 3:32pm
  • Why??

    by John

    Like post #18 mentioned, why in the world was this bill even introduced? If the guy sponsoring the bill thinks it has no chance to pass, then why even start the process? Why waste time, money, and resources on a bill that is clearly useless? Are the lawmakers that bored or that desperate for attention that they propose bills which will never pass?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Apr 3rd, 2008 @ 6:49am
  • by happycat

    why does the content of message boards even need to be monitored? i have every right to proclaim jews did 9/11 just to piss off ridiculous people who take this stuff seriously. not to mention it's true lamo XD

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Nov 18th, 2008 @ 10:40am
  • by johnyymathew

    This blog is more interesting and adds excitement. I recommend people to share ideas through their blogs which may help others. ------------------------ johnyymathew kentucky drug rehab

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • May 15th, 2009 @ 1:33pm
  • Anonymous Cowards

    by Tammy

    I think thi bill should be passed. Topix has gotten way out of control in our town. It is hurtful and some of the worst stuff that I have ever seen. Children are actually doing polls on who is the fattest in school. Who is the ugliest. These kids that are being cyberbullied cannont help themselves. This needs to stop

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It