Comcast Says FCC Has No Authority To Stop Traffic Shaping
from the lawsuit-already-shaping-up dept
This probably won’t come as much of a surprise, but Comcast is now suggesting that the FCC doesn’t have the authority to regulate its traffic shaping activities. This comes in response to Kevin Martin suggesting that the FCC would rule against Comcast for traffic shaping (which seemed odd enough, considering that Martin was perfectly fine with AT&T traffic shaping). Comcast is already suing the FCC over its telco favoritism, so this might just be one more thing to toss on the pile.
It’s tough to know who to favor in this situation — but Comcast may be technically correct that this extends beyond the FCC’s authority. Still, it might not be good policy for the company to say so, considering the efforts being made to put in place net neutrality legislation. If supporters of this legislation notice what Comcast is saying, it might just explicitly add language to the bill to give the FCC the authority that Comcast now says it doesn’t have. So, even if Comcast is right, saying so out loud may not have been the wisest move at this juncture.
Filed Under: authority, fcc, net neutrality, traffic shaping
Companies: comcast, fcc
Comments on “Comcast Says FCC Has No Authority To Stop Traffic Shaping”
First?
WHoo hoo
An ironic outcome would be for the court to rule that the FCC was allowed to watchdog network neutrality, but if it will, it must apply the rules fairly and evenly to all broadband providers.
Will K-Mart do it to annoy Comcast but in turn annoy his telco buddies? Or will K-Mart leave Comcast alone to keep peace with his telco peeps?
Nosy, er, inquiring minds want to know!
News at 11!
Woadan
Comcast can try what the might, we will reroute them!
telecommunication carriers
It all comes down to how one interprets the definition of ‘telecommunication carrier’. The telecommunications acts specify rules for exchange carriers, telecom carriers, broadcast services, and cable services. In the 1996 acts it was pretty simple, if you sell phone services your in telecom, if you push media via radio you abide by broadcast rights, and if you pushed media via cable you were a cable service.
But now what services you offer have nothing to do with the medium you offer it over. So what about TV over copper trunks? Phone over cable? Do you have to abide by all the rules then, or is it differentiated by medium or by service?
The ‘Telecommunication Acts of 1996’ need to be ratified by the ‘Digital Media and Content Services act of 20XX’ whenever someone gets around to writing one.
Re: telecommunication carriers
Better get started!!
What's traffic shaping?
It’s it like body sculpting? Or is it more like Censorship Lite. Now 98% free of things mid-westerners find offensive!
Predicted this week.
Brett Glass already predicted this:
from Dave Farbers IP list.
Of course, Brett comes off like a screaming child in his little rant, and there are a couple of good responses in that thread if you care to read them.
And yes, Brett throws Comcast into the fray, as if he’s sure that this is going to happen. How he knew would be an interesting question.
And calling P2P overwhelmingly criminal? Since when did a civil offense become criminal?
Re: Predicted this week.
Actually, it is the P2Pers, who want their pirated music and video at zero cost and won’t tolerate a moment’s delay in getting them, who might be said to be screaming like children. I’m simply advocating reasonable network management practices. And I am neither screaming about it nor slandering others, as you attempt to do to me above.
Re: Predicted this week.
Mr. Price, it’s you who comes off like a screaming child — and also an ignorant one. Title 17, Chapter 5, Section 506 of the US Code states that copyright infringement is a criminal offense if one reproduces or distributes (among other things) more than $1,000 worth of material. So, indeed, P2P (which was invented, by the way, for the purpose of infringing copyrights) is virtually always used for criminal activity.
That's Comcrapic
Now when the talking heads say “See you later’ they mean it.
http://newteevee.com/2008/03/18/comcast-cameras-to-start-watching-you/
http://tinyurl.com/2usdx4
http://tinyurl.com/2usdx4
f comcast
Comcast is a monopoly. I hope the FCC shuts them down. They get paid Billions through, advertisement/commercials….and then they charge a $50 dollar minimum for a FEW channels. Funny we have to pay to watch TV. The Billions they make in advertisement. Remember when you could watch a TV without cable,,,,,,free of charge? You still can…good luck seeing through all the snow even with an antenna. Yup, comcast has complete control, so much that you can’t get a clear picture without cable..
comcast internet email access
it’s really bothering me, that i have to always open the main page comcast.net in order to access my email at work. every time i do that it opens all this commercial page with ton’s of junk 2 times (not ones) , in order to get to my email ( i already pay them 50 bucks for internet ). it’s annoying to open all that junk just to get to my email during the work hours, and my boss bypass behind, and think i am checking out what j.lopez had for breakfast. i use to open http://www.comcast.net/login, and it work to skip that, but they figured it out lately, and they reroute you to their stupid main page. anyone has any tricks for this ?