Bleeding Edge

Bleeding Edge

by Mike Masnick


Print


Filed Under:
virtual smells


Virtual Smells Back Yet Again... And The Idea Still Stinks

from the please,-stop-the-stench dept

The idea of sending smells over the internet has been around for quite some time. In fact, one early web design shop created a "spoof" site for "RealAroma" as a play off of RealNetworks original product RealAudio. However, over the years we keep seeing real companies jump on the iSmell bandwagon. Digiscents got a ton of press coverage during the dot com bubble only to flop. In 2004, we heard of a company trying to resurect the idea, followed by a different company trying the same thing in 2005. If you haven't heard much about these lately, it might be because the idea stinks (literally and figuratively). They're all based on the same basic concept. You have to have a special device that has various "scents" that can be released via digital alerts to provide that right overall aroma.

It appears that the idea is now being revived once again, this time in Japan. NTT, the huge telco in Japan, is trying to offer a similar technology, though it's being marketed slightly differently. Rather than just adding smells to your daily internet surfing experience, the idea is that you can email or text message the scent machine from afar to set off a nice smell in your home, such that when you arrive, everything smells pretty. If you're already in the house, you can control the device via an infrared connection on your phone. Of course, that doesn't mean there isn't the "smell while your surf" option as well. The article describes how you could send someone virtual roses while also setting their smell-o-nator to offer up a rose scent. I would suggest, by the way, that you never do anything to piss off whoever has access to your smell generator. That might get downright putrid.

19 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. by Matt Bennett on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 12:56pm

    Well, if anywhere is a good place to try this out, it'd be Japan, home of the USB noodle-warmer.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. Hackers Dream by Killer_Tofu on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 1:04pm

    for (i = 0; i < Num_Scents; i++)
    {
    while (Scents[i].Empty == False)
    { Spray_Scent(); }
    }

    hehehe

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. Noooo my code by Killer_Tofu on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 1:05pm

    forgot an "i" in the Spray_Scent().
    "Spray_Scent(i);"

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Ummm by wrong again on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 1:10pm

    and you would want to use

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. by yo ho ho.... on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 1:20pm

    {sniff} {sniff}

    ... I think I smell another bubble coming....

    time for the Venture Capitalists to jump back on board!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. Re: by Joel Coehoorn on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 1:20pm

    Agreed. I think it sounds like a bad idea here in the US, but I could see the Japanese going for it, even if it's still a bit of long shot.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. Re: Noooo my code by Joel Coehoorn on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 1:22pm

    Since you've already established that a Scent is an object with properties like "Empty", shouldn't it be Scents[i].Spray(); anyway?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. Re: Re: Noooo my code by Joel again on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 1:24pm

    for (i=0; i

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. Re: Re: Noooo my code by one more try, so the html formatter doesn't break on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 1:25pm

    for (int i=0; i

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. I can see it now by Chronno S. Trigger on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 1:30pm

    Person 1: (snif)(snif) Dude, what the *%#@ is that smell

    Person 2: Sorry, My computer got a virus

    How many scents would this have. I'm guessing it would have vanilla and apple and the standard ones like that but would it have like tobacco smoke or... other things. Could have some fun with that.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. Maybe Joel by Killer_Tofu on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 1:33pm

    Depends on how I program the code.
    It could be either
    Scents[i].Spray()
    OR
    Spray_Scent(i)
    Both work depending on how you program. =)

    And for the Less Than sign you have to use the HTML code
    ampersand-L-T-semicolon.
    Otherwise it thinks you are entering an html tag =(
    Took me about 5 tries before I got my first post correct too.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. by lulz on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 1:53pm

    if(nerd){printf("You are a nerd");}

    a.out
    You are a nerd

    :)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  13. by Jake on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 2:12pm

    It's a useless gimmick for very rich idiots to impress other very rich idiots with, which means it'll be a license to print money if they get it to work.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  14. by Anonymous Coward on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 2:44pm

    it would be cool in games/videos (as long as nothing in them smells bad)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  15. Re: Hackers Dream by James on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 2:57pm

    Let me help you...

    Scent scentObj = new Scent();
    scentObj.Aroma = AromaLibrary.NonScents.Poop;

    while ( scentObj.NumberofRemainingSprays >0 )
    {
    scentObj.Activate();
    }

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  16. by Lucretious on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 3:35pm

    Brings back memories of this ....thing:

    http://www.onzin.nl/fufme/index.shtml.htm

    I could never figure out if it was a spoof or the real deal.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  17. by Bart on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 6:14pm

    Smell ya later

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  18. by CAPNBRAD on Apr 9th, 2008 @ 6:48pm

    someone would eventually get the bright idea to use it in porn,

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  19. Re: by Nasch on Apr 10th, 2008 @ 9:24am

    Gotta be a spoof. For one, the images are all CG, no photos. Second, "remote sex solution for the Internet and corporate intranet." Remote sex solution for the corporate intranet?? No way. It does sound like something someone should make though. A whole new level of phone sex. :-)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search the Techdirt Blog
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It