Pirate Bay Wants IFPI To Pay Up For Danish ISP Block

from the poking-ifpi-with-a-stick dept

The folks behind the Pirate Bay certainly aren’t ones to shy away from a fight. In fact, they seem to enjoy it. The latest is that they’re demanding compensation from the IFPI for downtime associated with the IFPI’s successful efforts to force Danish ISPs to block access to The Pirate Bay. The Pirate Bay says it will ask for a “reasonable” sum, rather than an extraordinary amount as is typical of the entertainment industry. It also says it will use any money it gets from the IFPI to fund Danish artists who want to give away their works online. While the guys at the Pirate Bay reasonably complain that the entire lawsuit between the IFPI and Danish ISPs never involved The Pirate Bay or gave the site a chance to make its own argument (despite being entirely about the site), this request for compensation may be pushing the boundaries a bit — especially considering that even The Pirate Bay folks have admitted that the ban eventually resulted in more traffic. Perhaps they should send some money to the IFPI to thank them for all that “free” advertising.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: ifpi, pirate bay

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Pirate Bay Wants IFPI To Pay Up For Danish ISP Block”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Chutzpah may have nothing to do with it. When one files suit one chooses the country, location, and court which provides major advantage to the person suing. A good example of this is that almost all American IP suits are filed in Marshall TX because it is assumed there that if you file suit then you are right and the other party is wrong. If one is assured that they are going to be sued then one would be prudent to strike first in a frendly court.

Anonymous Coward says:

this request for compensation may be pushing the boundaries a bit — especially considering that even The Pirate Bay folks have admitted that the ban eventually resulted in more traffic. Perhaps they should send some money to the IFPI to thank them for all that “free” advertising.

Right… and maybe the RIAA should be paying us the for the free promotion and distribution of their label’s music? Major organisations would never see it that way so why should the Pirate Bay? They deserve compensation.

SomeGuy says:

Re: Re:

I’d argue against the fact that they “deserve” compensation (especially if, as noted, the ban INCREASED their traffic, and thus there’s no corresponding “loss of business”), but I think it’s perfectly fair for them to play the game by the same rules the competition would. So I’m all for them suing the IFPI.

Matt says:

Re: a lawyer once put this wording perfectly, in fact today

From this article (the lawyer who monster stupidly tried to sue) – linked – http://www.audioholics.com/news/industry-news/blue-jeans-strikes-back

he says: ” After graduating from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 1985, I spent nineteen years in litigation practice, with a focus upon federal litigation involving large damages and complex issues. My first seven years were spent primarily on the defense side, where I developed an intense frustration with insurance carriers who would settle meritless claims for nuisance value when the better long-term view would have been to fight against vexatious litigation as a matter of principle. “

This is the answer. You lose a helluva lot more longterm money if you settle and wuss out on these lawsuits. In contrary, piratebay is going strong and then some, and people are resorting to illegal methods (IFPI for one) to try to shut them down.

Principle = all. Short term = how much will this cost us in court. Long term = what will this do for our business.

Franssu says:

Re: Re: a lawyer once put this wording perfectly, in fact today

I couldn’t agree more with your last sentence. Lots of businesses, mainly because they’re pushed by moronic shareholders (and forgetting the other stakeholders), only think short-term. Which is bad for them, bad for their industry, and bad for everyone in the long term. When will they learn ?

Cottor says:

Goddammit

I’m living in Denmark and experiencing this horrible cut!! goddamit why do they even bother shutting us off from TPB… we’ll just use another site to get our shit… and hell.. any decent torrent downloader has the decency to buy the products he enjoyed … like hell if I wanna spend 200 Dkr or 500 Dkr on a movie/game that was pure CRAP… anyways they’re only delaying us .. I’m just gonna use mininova until this shit clears off…

P.S. Yes I know about “demos” but they’re like trailers… they’ll make the game look great but in reality it’s not… however I’m mostly a movie fan

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...