Surprises

Surprises

by Mike Masnick


Print


Filed Under:
flowers, internet

Companies:
ftd, united online


Why Is An Internet Access Company Getting Into The Flower Business?

from the reverse-zapata? dept

If you lived through the first dot com bubble, you probably remember the story of Zapata. This was the former fish-oil company that suddenly decided it wanted to become an internet powerhouse. It put out an unsolicited bid for Excite.com and later announced that it was willing to pay millions for totally random web-based startups to build into its own Zap.com portal. It was a laughingstock of the dot com bubble -- highlighting a non-internet company's rather hamfisted attempt to be thought of as an internet company. However, the news that United Online is buying flower company FTD feels like a Zapata-like moment -- even if it's in reverse. United Online, of course, was formed from the merger of NetZero and Juno, two dot com-era "free/cheap" dialup providers. A few years back, it also bought also-ran quasi-social networking site Classmates.com, and more recently failed to spin that off into an IPO. United Online also bought an online "loyalty" points provider, MyPoints, which again, seems rather unrelated to its other businesses.

While you can understand why the company would want to diversify from crappy dialup internet access and a failed social network that no one uses any more, it still seems weird for it to get into the flower business. Yes, it's true that FTD does a ton of business online, but it's difficult to see what sort of "expertise" United Online has to offer FTD. It's even more odd when you consider that things like Barry Diller's attempt to build a conglomerate of disparate internet properties is being broken up, as he was unable to make whatever "synergies" appear. Maybe there's some explanation that makes sense for United Online, but it feels Zapata-like. It may not quite be fish-oil, but an internet company buying a flower company just doesn't seem right.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. by Anonymous Coward on May 2nd, 2008 @ 4:48am

    Haven't you ever watched a movie? All the great bad guys came from Sweden, and were in the flower business. This is just their initial bid into world domination. Soon the board of directors will all start saying "ya", and get a weird facial scar.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. by Anonymous Coward on May 2nd, 2008 @ 4:58am

    Flower Powered Internet - WoOt!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. by Michael on May 2nd, 2008 @ 6:33am

    Does the first acquisition create the synergies, or the last? And which direction (offline buying online properties versus online companies buying offline properties) make the most sense?

    United's FTD bid might seem odd, but one of Liberty Media's latter ones (they bought..a online flower broker) raised no eyebrows. Liberty, of course, wanted to expand their TV presence (home shopping) with an online asset - maybe United buys five more media properties and then it starts looking right?

    Just thinking out loud.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Must be a slow news day by Keybored on May 2nd, 2008 @ 7:56am

    Does anyone even give a crap about this, what's wrong with you?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Flower wire services by jonnyq on May 2nd, 2008 @ 8:22am

    I know a little about this subject...

    Companies like FTD provide things to local florists. They provide a wire service - an "online" service for sending/receiving orders. They provide specialty containers. Some may provide point-of-sale systems (tied in with their wire service) They'll also provide some web-based services - custom/template web sites, a web interface to their wire service, etc.

    Most of that seems a little out of realm for a company like United Online, but not all. If their goal is to get more podunk florists (there are thousands of them) connected to the wire service (a la NetZero) maybe they have something to offer florists they couldn't already offer. I don't know exactly how the wire services work - they may actually be non-Internet based dialup services. Maybe United Online can offer some streamlining there.

    It may be smart, it may not, but FTD is hardly a "flower company" as much as it's a network service provider for a specialized market.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. by McMillan on May 3rd, 2008 @ 10:19pm

    The data is cool, the company that provides flowers and related services to about 20,000 retailers in the U.S., Canada, the U.K. and Ireland. Just like many people like use auction tools (such using listomax), there have many people like this way to buy flowers on internet.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search the Techdirt Blog
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It