Fewer Than 5,000 Broadband Over Powerlines Subscribers
from the again:-it's-dead,-jim dept
Following the story earlier in the week about the death of broadband over powerlines, Broadband Reports points out that even by the FCC's "stunningly meaningless" broadband stats (that tend to inflate access claims), BPL only has 4,776 subscribers. This for the technology that it declared as "the great broadband hope" five years ago. So, once more, with feeling: broadband over powerlines is dead. It's not a serious option.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
how many zipcodes by some old guy on May 8th, 2008 @ 5:30pm
how many zipcodes does that cover? remember now, the FCC considers 2 broadband providers in an entire zip code as "competition" for the entire zip code.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I'm no master of the subject, but... by Elohssa on May 8th, 2008 @ 5:46pm
..as a concept, it makes sense, because access to power, phone and water lines is guaranteed by the government in almost every modernized nation. Cable and fiber is not (yet.)
At the same time, the idea of using the self-same lines just sounds dangerous to maintain. Might as well float fiber through the sewers.
Maybe it would be better to guarantee right-of-way access (within reason) to the poles to private companies? They could hang their own gear up there, and then just connect the dots.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Fiber through sewers, what a novel idea... by Agonizing Fury on May 8th, 2008 @ 5:54pm
Your comment reminded me of a great april fools day joke. Sorry about the OT comment, but it was just too funny after that comment. Check out google's Toilet Internet Service Provider:
http://www.google.com/tisp/
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
What kinda power? by Mischa G on May 8th, 2008 @ 6:06pm
See, it's a shame that IP over power lines didn't wok. They shoulda made it IP over power lines delivering power made from cow crap! Then they'd have had a winner.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Fiber through sewers, what a novel idea... by Anonymous Coward on May 8th, 2008 @ 6:17pm
That's just what I thought of too.
If anyone could do it, though, it'd be google.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Broadband Over Powerlines by Rich Brownlee on May 8th, 2008 @ 9:28pm
The reason BPL is not popular is very few of the people in the country are aware of it. Not everybody lives in a large city...u would be surprised of the people who aren't even aware of HDTV! I still have dial-up and am located about 1000 yds. from a broadband area--moving is no option so BPL would be ideal but the bottom line is it would be too much competition for the BIG phone companies.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Broadband Over Powerlines by dorpass on May 8th, 2008 @ 10:21pm
Actually no, the reason BPL is not popular is because it is so damn hard to implement and then scale. It serves just fine for slow speed functions (like getting information from power meters) but at high speeds with many users, the noise is just too much.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Anonymous Coward on May 8th, 2008 @ 10:44pm
Also (if memory serves) some implementations of broadband over power lines interferes with registered amateur radio frequencies, which would have to be relocated to another part of the spectrum.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
So, why are we still talking about it? by Nasch on May 9th, 2008 @ 7:39am
I'm just curious - if it's so dead, why keep reporting on it? I'm not complaining of course, you can write about anything you want.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by bob on May 9th, 2008 @ 8:58am
When did someone actually get this working?
The last thing I read was that it still wasn't working and would be ready for the rollout of the next Duke Nukem game.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Broadband Over Powerlines by stationstops on May 9th, 2008 @ 9:58pm
Exactly - make no doubt about it, if BPL was a competitive solution to DSL/Cable someone would have capitalized and marketed it to death a loongg time ago - and everyone *would* know about it - the fact that no one does know about it means there is a reason upstream.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment