RSS
Twitter
French ISPs Agree To Censor The Web
from the moving-in-a-bad-direction dept
Well here's a news story that actually combines two separate recent stories here. France, who we've just talked about for its repeated mistake in blaming platforms for the actions of their users, has followed down the same path that New York state just trekked concerning misguided concepts on how to stop objectionable content online. That is, France is now requiring ISPs to block a list of sites that it determines as objectionable. Apparently the list will be based on sites flagged by web users. Again, this is targeting the wrong thing and won't do much to actually stop the dissemination of the content. If the content itself is illegal, go after those responsible. Simply blocking it opens up all kinds of censorship questions, and opens the door to that slippery slope of what's considered "objectionable." With no real way to make sure that the content is actually objectionable, it's easy to see this system being abused in an attempt to silence people or viewpoints.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
I am eager to see what the French deem objectionable. I mean, I know that isn't the point of the article, but its definitely an interesting tangent.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
If they were serious about this, one suspects they'd be doing something a bit more proactive than relying on user-flagging; apart from the odd spam email, it's fairly rare to stumble across child pornography or snuff movies by accident.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The French?
This surprises me about the French - they are usually very stubborn with any civil liberties and revolt at the drop of a hat! I would have thought that they'd feel strongly against this sort of thing, but then most Internet users won't even realise so it's easy to implement without fuss.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
Well, I suppose you can count on those anti-pedophile brigades to try to hunt every last site to get it banned.
I don't think ANYONE can unwittingly stumble across child porn.
I am concerned about how many controversial yet perfectly legitimate sites might end up flagged by prude puritans...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
here's one for their list
ye olde 'french military victories' page: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/victories.html
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Typical French
I hear that there is an exception to this rule, all.fr domains are excluded because they do not want to restrict their own rights!!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
proxys?
Surely then the people could just used a proxy server to get round this filter/blocker.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
nuke france
http://www.lewrockwell.com/higgs/higgs15.html
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: proxys?
They could use a proxy server, and don't call me Shirlie.
(But presumeably that proxy server would need to be outside the country)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Takedown request
Cher Orginasation de Removale des Sites Objectionables sur l'Internet,
Please remove google.fr since they are hosting objectionable materials.
Merci,
yahoo.fr
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: proxys?
lol
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Just like a virtual book burnin'!!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Objectionable? In France?
LOL, the French get to smoke in restaurants while others nearby eat their food. I can't imagine the French would find much objectionable.
JT
www.FireMe.to/udi
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I find the whole concept of Jesus objectionable. Lets block every site that mentions him.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
granted the premise...
... the conclusion follows.
If you accept that the state has any legitimacy or authority to rule in one aspect of individuals' lives, making the argument that it should stop short of dictating in THIS aspect seems arbitrary.
The French are obsessed with government. The "this goes too far!" arguments don't seem right to me. They just sound like "I want the government to do everything I do like, but nothing that I don't like."
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: here's one for their list
Ever heard of Napoleon?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Objectionable? In France?
> the French get to smoke in restaurants while others nearby eat their food.
Not any more. A new law forbidding smoking in restaurants is in application since the beginning of the year.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Legitimate Sites
Funny, because when I got to the portion of the article that said it would be based on user-flags, all I could think of was to go and flag ALL religious sites, ALL government sites, AFP, Le Monde and any site that is hosted by the prudish organizations that pushed for this. Let's see how they implement this if it's the French Gov't's site that is being blocked!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
But of course!
Of course they should be blocked.
Say, where can I get the list of whats being blocked? :)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Maybe the French like a bland internet
If a handful of people can file a complaint with the FCC over Janet Jackson at the 2004 Superbowl and cause the FCC to fine CBS stations an ungodly amount of money, imagine what a crowd of people in France can do.
It's just a matter of time before all the "critic" sites get taken down because too many users "flagged" them. I can see groups like Scientology telling their followers to flag all the anti-Scientology sites. And guess what? The sites come down in France.
There may be laws against government censorship, but when you're dealing with organizations and ISP's, then the government's "right to free speech" no longer applies.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Really?
Yawn.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: The French?
No, it is only that the information is not reaching us properly....
Our gouvernement is keeping things out of our sight.
We have to stand up and fight......Before it is too late
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment