Don't You Feel Safer Now That Google Added A Link To Its Privacy Policy?
from the phew! dept
One of the more idiotic accusations thrown at Google of late was this idea that it was somehow a problem that it didn't link directly to its privacy policy from its home page. It had a privacy policy. That privacy policy was easy to find. Almost no one actually reads its privacy policy -- but a bunch of privacy groups who surely had more important things to spend their time on got all upset that Google refused to link from its front page. It appears that Google has now given in and agreed to link to the privacy policy, oddly removing the word "Google" from its copyright notice and replacing it with a link to the privacy policy.
Perhaps more idiotic is the response from a bunch of privacy groups claiming that this somehow makes a difference. It doesn't. It's privacy theater. It looks good, but it means nothing. People still won't read the privacy policy -- and even if they did, they probably wouldn't even remember what it said. Where a privacy policy is linked from a website is meaningless compared to what a company actually does to take the privacy of its users seriously. Getting up in arms over whether or not Google links to the privacy policy from its front page is a joke. And, oh yeah, some are noticing that just linking to the privacy policy probably does not fulfill the legal obligation required by California's law on linking to privacy policies. Perhaps these "privacy advocate" groups have something else to complain about now.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
I do feel much better.
Oh yes, one more text link that no one will read, and that a judge will just render garble with a broad stroke of his injustice, pandering once more to the media industry. Much better indeed.
Viacom vs Google $1 billon they think is worthless
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080703/0154271581.shtml
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: I do feel much better.
Is there a point to this senseless rant? Or have you forgotten to take your Prozac/Ritalin again? Maybe next time, you can concentrate on constructing complete, coherent sentences, and after that, we'll work on confining your comments to the actual topic.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Smelly things
It's great that Google now has a privacy policy. But why did it take so long? What is hiding behind the curtan?
Also, I love cheese and eleete is awesome too. Mort is just rotting meat and not very tasty. Trust me, I know.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
But it was threre already
on my iGoogle homepage...
So ummm... What was the point again?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Right on target
The topic is do you feel safer. The answer, No I do not !
for the mentally impaired above.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Sweeeeeet!
I feel so much more private now searching for pr0n.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Who cares...
With Viacom's recent win in getting all of GooTubes's user data the privacy of Google data is meaningless anyway. As soon as some company gets all pissed off about people supposedly searching for copyrighted data all of that "private" Google data will be turned over to someone else anyway.
It's a false sense of security and means absolutely nothing. They shouldn't even bother having the policy in the first place!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I thought you were all about personal rights, Mike. Just because you can find it doesn't mean that someone who is computer illerate can find it. Stop being a technology elitist. That is the kind of smugness that makes you sound like Obama.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
So it is
I've been to Google a few times this morning and didn't even notice that link was added to the main page until I read this post. I even went back to see it for myself! Granted, I still didn't click on it and read it.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I give no credence to any privacy policy, and particularly those containing boilerplate that it can be changed at any time at the site's sole discretion and without notice being given before any such change.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
28
They've been keeping their front-page word count down. It's been as high as 61 and as low as 13. Right now, it's at 28 words, and to keep it from getting more wordy, they dropped the (obvious and implied) "Google" from the copyright and replaced it with "Privacy."
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/what-comes-next-in-this-series-13-33-53.html
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
@8: Mike's entire point is that "computer illerate" (as you put it) people won't check the privacy policy anyway.
None of the computer illiterate people I know are even aware that companies that run websites may even have a privacy policy. They either assume that all transactions online can be snooped on by hackers (if they're paranoid) or that everything they do is private.
Oh and by the way, don't look now, but your politics are showing.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
A good joke
It would be funny if the Privacy link was just a rickroll. I wonder if anyone would ever find out?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: I do feel much better.
I'm pretty sure he just said, "when a Judge can force Google to violate any Privacy Policy they draft, what does it matter where the link goes?"
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Smelly things
Google's HAD a policy. And it's been visible and trivial to find. Now there's a link on the front page, and people are acting like this is a huge step for the rights of the people.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
Mike's point is that this is a meaningless gesture. Having a link on the front page doesn't change anything at all.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: A good joke
That would be awesome.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I'm utterly confused why people keep reading these articles thinking that it is just unbiased reports on the news, and then complaining when it isn't.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Online Privacy
I know it's been mentioned before, albeit in various ways, but it bears repeating: there is no such thing as online privacy. Anyone who expects their online activities - from what sites they visit to what they actually post - to remain confidential is delusional. It may not always be the site's intention to disclose such information, but I have yet to find any that don't leave themselves a loophole or two should their intentions change. Not to mention the obvious cases of sites whose sole purpose is to gather (and usually sell) information about what people are doing online.
Personally, I think if they're going to bother with laws governing privacy notices on websites, they should all just say the following:
Everything you view, click, post, or otherwise have anything to do with on our site can at any time be revealed to a third party without notice of any kind given to you. Use at your own risk.
It'd save a fair amount of space on their servers, and be a lot more accurate.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
So if you aren't going to check it then you shouldn't have easy access to it. Does anyone actually read the private policy when they sign up for anything anymore? Well, let's just get rid of that too.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Google has a homepage?
I haven't been to it for years. Search bars and igoogle are much more efficient. Bob Denver for president 2008!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
um no never have never will
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Smelly things
Google has always had a privacy policy. It could be found under the link on the front page... let's see, what was it called...
OH! I KNOW! "About Google..."
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Overreaction...
Mike, I think this is a bit of an overreaction on your part. It was good for Google -- a site who catalogues damn near the entire internet, and then some -- to have their privacy policy easy to find. It may not have been difficult to find before, but in a site as all encompassing as Google, they should make it as easy as humanly possible to get this information.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Just Google It!
Why not just Google "Google Privacy Policy?"
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
before today, i didn't feel safe at all using google. every time i did a search, i felt unsafe. every time i did an image search, i felt unsafe. every time i checked my gmail, i felt unsafe.
today, i can finally feel safe.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
So, um, what was the point?
The point to this is that a small "privacy group" got to tell Google how to manage its site. The "privacy group" now has bragging rights about it made the "large site" "cave to our demands".
Look out, Yahoo and Microsoft- you may be next.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
and...
"People still won't read the privacy policy -- and even if they did, they probably wouldn't even remember what it said."
And, if they remembered what it said, unless they are lawyers willing to do legal research on the terminology, they certainly won't understand the legal implications of the terminology used.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment