(Mis)Uses of Technology

(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
clear, laptops, lost data, security, tsa, verified identity

Companies:
verified identity pass




TSA Vendor Who Lost Laptop Apologizing To People Who Didn't Even Apply

from the good-record-keeping dept

We recently wrote about how TSA-approved vendor, Verified Identity Pass, had lost a laptop containing all sorts of unencrypted data on people who had applied to be a part of the TSA's "fast pass" Clear program (letting you skip the long security lines for a $100/year). While the laptop was eventually found (in the same place it was lost), the company insists that no data on the laptop was compromised, and has sent out emails to applicants for Clear. But, it appears that at least something is amiss as David Weinberger received one of the emails despite never having applied for the program. So apparently they're just informing people at random now. Or someone else applied in Weinberger's name. Makes you feel very secure, doesn't it?

13 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. Clear

    by TSA GUY - Aug 11th, 2008 @ 2:19pm

    Clear is subsidized by the taxpayers so "special" people can cut to the front of the line.
    This isn't fair to the other taxpayers in the long line.
    There is no way 100 a year covers background checks and extra security lines for the clear people.
    Call your congressman and dump this crap now!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. by Anonymous Coward - Aug 11th, 2008 @ 2:50pm

    What difference does it make?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. Re: Clear

    by Jason - Aug 11th, 2008 @ 2:55pm

    Actually, a background check costs about $15.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Re: Clear

    by Chris - Aug 11th, 2008 @ 3:48pm

    While I agree it should not be subsidized, I didn't think less than $12/month could only be affordable to "specials." I'm piss poor, but if I traveled alot I would budget it in. Seems like the subsidy helps keep it affordable for "less than special" people. Otherwise it would be like the disparity between the price of coach to the price of 1st class. Take the subsidy away and it might only be for the rich in the long run.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  5. Re: Re: Clear

    by Chris - Aug 11th, 2008 @ 3:49pm

    *EDIT* I meant less than $10/month

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  6. Good Idea, very very very bad execution..

    by Don - Aug 11th, 2008 @ 4:01pm

    I was a clear member when they were first rolling out the program. They promised me the Clear lanes would open at the San Jose airport on a specific date. When there were delays, they refused to extend my membership and I actually never used my card. I was ripped off by CLEAR and would never recommend this program to anyone. Oh, BTW... I keep getting renewal offers from clear and it's $128.00 for the first year (not $100 as the article states).

    Now... it's a great idea to have an idea of who to filter out of your system. The system as it stands now is horribly flawed and I have heard news reports of people on the list can't get off, people who've been openly critical of the system being somehow on the list, and I'm sure there are people not on the list who should be. Now watch, I'll be on the list next.

    We take our shoes off at the airport as part of a knee-jerk reaction, we finally can leave our laptops in their bags and we can't take but a thimble full of fluids with us... and the list goes on. It's a major disaster and probably should be scrapped so we can begin anew.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  7. by Beta - Aug 11th, 2008 @ 4:24pm

    As I understand it, Clear is NOT a pre-screening or "trusted passenger" service: if you're a member you still have to pass the metal detector and X-ray machine like everyone else, it's just that you get to use the "members only line" (which is probably less crowded) and maybe you have valets helping you with your bags. It's a matter of convenience, not security.

    Therefore, two points spring to mind: 1) There is no good reason to require applicants to supply sensitive personal information to apply, it's just more of the knee-jerk "we want all your information" thinking (which leads to bad security). And 2) so what if somebody applied in Weinberger's name? Depending on how stupid Clear's own security is, it's either a membership that no one can use, or one that Weinberger can use for free.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  8. Q: if they cannot guard a laptop, how can they protect an airport?

    by Howard_NYC - Aug 11th, 2008 @ 5:19pm

    Q: if they cannot guard a laptop, how can they protect an airport?

    the deal was, citizen would trade comfort for safety... and know we have neither...

    if TSA keeps this or any other vendor capable of such a knucklehead play, there should be terminations of senior managers...

    the C-levels at the vendor should be asked to step down -- today

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  9. by Cynic - Aug 11th, 2008 @ 5:59pm

    Amazing, I didn't know the technology existed to tell whether information was copied off a laptop's hard disk. Maybe there's a tiny little odometer on each byte and they read all the odometers and they were the same.

    So there's something I don't know about, or they're lying through their teeth.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  10. How did they win the bid?

    by VMD - Aug 12th, 2008 @ 6:14am

    This story really makes me wonder how TSA screens and picks contractors. Is there a bid competition? What are the criteria? It does look like TSA needs to rethink this process. Perhaps a major overhaul of TSA itself may be a good start.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  11. i bet mohhamad atta

    by known coward - Aug 12th, 2008 @ 8:39am

    would have enjoyed the convenience of this program.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  12. by Overcast - Aug 13th, 2008 @ 8:33pm

    Amazing, I didn't know the technology existed to tell whether information was copied off a laptop's hard disk. Maybe there's a tiny little odometer on each byte and they read all the odometers and they were the same.

    So there's something I don't know about, or they're lying through their teeth.


    Yes, very true. And even if something was in place to track that on the OS running on the laptop, it's not hard to boot it with a CD with Linux on it, mount the file system in read only mode and copy away. They couldn't reliably prove that no data was copied. Actually, the smartest of thieves may have well swiped it, copied needed data and put it right back where they found it.

    Hey - question - could they be sued for 'making available' the data? :) Why not? The RIAA seems to think so.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  13. Security is a problem.

    by David@Used laptops - Jan 12th, 2009 @ 1:42am

    What ever ways are invented toprotectcomputer codes the faster the guys learn to break the codes.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..
Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It