RSS
Twitter
Singers Sue Label For Failing To Sue Others For Infringement
from the sue-or-be-sued dept
Techdirt has covered many copyright lawsuits in the past, but this one is a bit different. Singers Daryl Hall and John Oates have filed a suit against their publisher, Warner/Chappell Music, who they claim have failed to enforce their rights and sue an unnamed singer-songwriter for infringement. They claim this is in breach of their contract, and are seeking the termination of said contract as well as unspecified damages.
Two things strike me about this lawsuit (although I'm not a lawyer and haven't seen the contract, so take it for what it's worth). First, though the alleged infringer isn't named, there seem to be two possibilities given they date it as 2006 - Nelly Furtado's Maneater was apparently influenced by it, and it was sampled by the Ying Yang Twins in their song Dangerous. I would have hoped both of these would be covered by fair use -- Oates in fact said of the former, "it's flattering and it makes you feel good because you think you've influenced a new generation of musicians." The second is that litigation should be a tool of last resort, and a lawsuit over someone not suing isn't exactly in line with that sentiment.
In fairness to Hall and Oates, their reasoning for the filing is that Warner/Chappell have failed to act over a "conflict of interest", which implies the publishers were benefiting from the alleged infringement and failing to pass that benefit on. Still, the idea that a label could be liable for failing to sue for copyright infringement is hardly likely to improve the litigation-happy nature of the industry at present.
Douglas Gresham is an expert at the Insight Community. To get insight and analysis from Douglas Gresham and other experts on challenges your company faces, click here.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Maybe Hall and Oates are filing suit because they want out of the contract more than anything else.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
^AC^ FTW!!!!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
You beat me too it...that's my guess as well. It is simply a tactic to get out from under a burdensome contract.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
After all this time, I am surprised they still have a contract!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Is it known if Nelly Furtado or Ying Yang Twins are represented by Warner/Chappell Music? Wouldn't that be a key component to benefiting from the alleged infringement? What other way could they benefit without passing it on?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Samples=Fair use?
Since when has sampling fallen under fair use? *grabbing turntable and firing up pro tools*
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Ah, leave Hall and Oates alone. They're family men. And their bark is much worse than their bite. (Sorry, had to.)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
my thoughts exactly. If they're allowed to do so, I can imagine a ton of artists are going to run like hell from their labels claiming the same.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
And techdirt readers continue to show their ignorance about publishing. Continue talking it is entertaining.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
And anonymous cowards continue showing their ignorance about commenting on Techdirt. Because I said so. With nothing to back it up. Please continue, it is entertaining.
See what I did there?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Samples=Fair use?
We can sample unpurchased music?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
You left out your last name and your home address and telephone number and email and myspace page?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Wow
Doesn't get any better than this. Is this what the music industry is coming down to sue sue sue! If you aren't making enough money than just sue! What a world we live in.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re:
What is this? A weak attempt at demeaning me? Nice ad hominem. Why don't you come back when you have something of substance to offer?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Samples=Fair use?
I have no idea whether they qualify as fair use under current US law (I'm neither a lawyer nor American); I just think they're the kind of things that should be fair use.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
Yes, I think that's a distinct possibility. The effect is the same whatever their motivations, though, and that's the bit that's interesting - although of course motivations would play a big part in the number of future actions.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment