(Mis)Uses of Technology

(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
police, texting while driving



Police Chief Gets Into Car Accident While Checking His Blackberry

from the nice-move dept

Just as politicians and the police have been increasingly cracking down on drivers who are using mobile phones for texting and emailing while driving, a police chief in the Seattle suburb of Federal Way has issued an apology for hitting another car while checking his Blackberry. Apparently it was a minor accident, that occurred when the chief, Brian Wilson, was stopped at a traffic light in an unmarked police car. He started checking his Blackberry and took his foot off the brake, allowing the car to roll forward into another vehicle. The chief says he takes full responsibility for the accident and is mortified... Of course, it sounds like no legal action will be taken even though Washington was the first state to enact anti-texting while driving laws.

51 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Mar 30th, 2009 @ 8:25am
  • Just goes to show ya... because of the fact that nobody buys CDs anymore Brian Wilson gave up on the Beach Boys and went into Law Enforcement. It isn't just Record companies that suffer when we illegally copy songs it is innocent drivers :(

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 8:37am
  • Was he cited for breaking the law?

    by R. Miles

    Doubt it.

    Too bad many more won't learn from this idiot's mistake.

    I can't believe people think it's more damn important to answer a message than it is to drive a car.

    What, does using a phone require more damn skills than driving a car now?

    Well, with a keyboard on some phones...

    I'm all for Faraday cages in cars. Block 'em all.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 10:25am
    • Re: Was he cited for breaking the law?

      by Mike

      even if he was cited it would just be a traffic ticket. Its not like the guy ran someone over. It was an honest accident. A stupid accident, but i'm really tired of the governments condinuos effots to legislate stupidity. And people wonder why our court system is broken or that we (the land of the free) put more people in jail/prison than any other country in the world.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Mar 30th, 2009 @ 9:00am
  • Do as I say - Not as I Do

    by Not Guilty

    Apparently the laws do not apply to those who make or enforce them.

    Another chapter in the continuing saga of "I'm Above the Law".

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 9:10am
    • Re: Do as I say - Not as I Do

      by Anonymous Coward

      This makes me wonder how many tickets this chief of police guy has written (or overviewed his staff cite) to "drivers who are using mobile phones for texting and emailing while driving", while this guy chooses for himself to do nothing to remedy his own problem with the act..

      I agree completely with your statement: Another chapter in the continuing saga of "I'm Above the Law"

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 9:51am
      • Re: Re: Do as I say - Not as I Do

        by Anonymous Coward #42

        I would have to disagree with the statement about being above the law. If this officer believed he was above the law, he would have been tap-dancing like crazy to get out of any punishment, and might even go so far as to try and pin the blame on the driver of the car he hit. No, he admitted his guilt in the matter and accepted full responsibility for his actions. This man in no way believes he is above the law.

        Remember, everybody is human, and everybody makes honest mistakes, including law enforcement officers. The difference (and what defines your character) is whether you accept responsibility for your mistakes, or try to pass the blame to somebody else. I'm sure he has learned his lesson and will never allow this to happen again.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 10:20am
        • Re: Re: Re: Do as I say - Not as I Do

          by Anonymous Coward

          Anonymous Coward #42: "Remember, everybody is human, and everybody makes honest mistakes"

          Please explain to me what part of, "using mobile phones for texting and emailing while driving" was an UNINTENTIONAL mistake?

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 12:32pm
        • Re: Re: Re: Do as I say - Not as I Do

          by Anonymous Coward

          yes yes, I agree that he admited he made a mistake, the REAL difference, is that if you were in an accident and admitted to texting/email you would probably get a ticket. (he may not be saying hes "above the law" but he for sure is living by it by not receiving a ticket) sry but that's the truth of it. PROVE ME WRONG.....

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 6:22pm
        • Re: Re: Re: Do as I say - Not as I Do

          by Anonymous Coward

          No, he admitted his guilt in the matter and accepted full responsibility for his actions

          Accepting full responsibility would mean getting a ticket and conviction for negligent collision on his driving record. That isn't happening.

          This man in no way believes he is above the law.

          He apparently does.

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

          • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 6:38pm
          • Re: Re: Re: Re: Do as I say - Not as I Do

            by Anonymous Coward

            I don't know about the State of Washington, but in Texas state law says that accidents involving a police officer do not go on the officer's record. and they sure don't get tickets. That's why they all have such good driving records if you check.

            Now if one of them gets stinking drink behind the wheel and causes the death of a whole family with some cute little kids in the car and the press picks up on it, then they might be be held accountable. Might. Provided of course that the officer wasn't just doing his duty to stop a "terrorist" family from carrying out their dastardly plan of invading the local Walmart on a Sunday morning when any decent family would have been in church.

            (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      Mar 30th, 2009 @ 4:36pm
    • Re: Do as I say - Not as I Do

      by Pravitus

      Exactly true. Although Washington has enacted an "anti-texting" law, and a hands-free cellphone law, it is true that public safety officers are exempt from this law. See RCW 46.61.668 http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=46.61.668 Pravitus

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Mar 30th, 2009 @ 9:08am
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Give the guy some credit, he admitted what he did. Most people would probably just say they were not paying attention.

    I know I have almost hit another car because a nice looking blond was walking down the street. The only time I feel bad about doing that is when it turns out to be a wimpy hippy guy that just needed a haircut.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 9:15am
    • Re:

      by Anonymous Coward

      "Give the guy some credit, he admitted what he did."

      The same could be said for the guys who flew stolen airplanes into buildings a few years back. They admitted to doing it and they received the credit for doing it.

      For both situations, also just give out the correct punishment which they earned for their acts.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 2:31pm
      • Re: Re:

        by Phil McCraken

        WTF is wrong with you? Do you understand what a continuum is? On the continuum of logic with one end being good and the other end being moronic, you don't even make the scale...

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 6:44pm
        • Re: Re: Re:

          by Anonymous Coward

          WTF is wrong with you? Can't you see that admitting to a wrong doesn't excuse it? In fact, some people even brag.

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      Mar 30th, 2009 @ 12:28pm
    • Re:

      by Anonymous Coward

      its not about giving him credit, (It is good that he owned up to it though) its about the fact that hes simply braking the law, therefore should be cited for it. doesnt matter whos braking the law. Do as i say, not as I do.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Mar 30th, 2009 @ 9:26am
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Brutal Crowd. At least he was using the BB while at a light, stopped (mostly).

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 9:31am
    • Re:

      by Weird Harold's former #5 fan

      At least he was using the BB while at a light, stopped (mostly).

      That's still illegal here in California - for those of us not in the "I'm Above the Law" crowd, anyway.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Mar 30th, 2009 @ 9:48am
  • iPhone

    by Josh Cerdia

    This would have never have happened if he had an iPhone, because the iPhone's navigation is easier to browse through emails/text and with it's big screen also better/easier to read.

    Buy iPhone ASAP before we start seeing more of these accidents in the country, you could even think as the iPhone saving lives!

    Josh

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 9:52am
    • Re: iPhone

      by Anonymous Coward

      In addition, Josh Cerdia thinks it is legal to use your iphone while driving.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 9:58am
      • Re: Re: iPhone

        by Josh Cerdia

        Of course it is... I do it all the time in the freeway:

        - Lookup directions
        - Check my email
        - Make Phone calls
        - Take pictures (There are some bad drivers out there)
        - Read Texts

        I could type emails and texts, but it is a bit dangerous... when I need to reply, I move stop to the side of the road, though I could just type without watching the keypad, but it's a bit hard (but doable).

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 11:01am
        • Re: Re: Re: iPhone

          by ehrichweiss

          I think you missed the point. In Washington it would still be illegal to make calls or txt while driving. The fact that it's made by Apple doesn't come into it at that point.

          Jeez, you Apple fanbois really do think you're gods, huh.

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

          • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 11:22am
          • Re: Re: Re: Re: iPhone

            by Josh Cerdia

            First of all, it's NOT illegal in WA state to make or receive calls, it is illegal to do it without a headset of some kind.

            Second, I'm not an Apple Fanboy... I am however a gadget ninja that needs to be wired/(or unwired) to the net 24/7, every minute of the hour, every second of the minute.

            (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

            • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 1:26pm
            • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: iPhone

              by Kilgore Trout

              You really need to get a life.

              (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

              • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 1:45pm
              • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: iPhone

                by Josh Cerdia

                I have a life! You just don't understand us IT folk.

                (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

              • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 2:34pm
              • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: iPhone

                by Baloney Joe

                Sarcasm, look it up in the dictionary...

                (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

                • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 2:51pm
                • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: iPhone

                  by Josh Cerdia

                  Dictionary? what's that?...*Googles it*... Oh, I see:

                  sarcasm |ˈsärˌkazəm|
                  noun
                  the use of irony to mock or convey contempt : his voice, hardened by sarcasm, could not hide his resentment. See note at wit .
                  ORIGIN mid 16th cent.: from French sarcasme, or via late Latin from late Greek sarkasmos, from Greek sarkazein ‘tear flesh,’ in late Greek ‘gnash the teeth, speak bitterly’ (from sarx, sark- ‘flesh’ ).

                  (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

            Mar 30th, 2009 @ 12:37pm
          • Re: Re: Re: Re: iPhone

            by Anonymous Coward

            they are gods!!!!!! bow 2 the apple gods...... bitch.. ;)

            (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

          • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 12:40pm
          • Re: Re: Re: Re: iPhone

            by Paul man

            ok, so even if it becomes Illegal to use phones in Illinois (i know it is in chitown) I will still use them, just power it off as the officer approches the car. and say i just like the feel of it, look osifer its off ;)

            (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

            • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 1:17pm
            • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: iPhone

              by Anonymous Coward

              Just tell the officer that your iphone is in car mode.

              (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

              • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 1:46pm
              • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: iPhone

                by josh Cerdia

                There is no such thing... If you turn on the "Airplane Mode" you won't be able to access the 2.5 or 3G networks for Google Maps, or get phone calls, or text. The only dumb thing you can do on your car with your iPhone while driving is play games or look at video podcasts,e tc...

                (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Mar 30th, 2009 @ 10:08am
  • Federal Way has bigger problems

    by BlackWidow

    I live in Federal Way and it is a a giant strip mall infested with gang members and meth heads. It has way bigger problems than the police chief and his blackberry. If you get rear ended at a stop light as the worst thing that happens to you while driving here, you are lucky! Yesterday someone was shot in the face at a park and ride!

    I am sure police officers have many things in their cars that could be considered much bigger distractions (Including the drunk bum in the back seat).

    I am not saying it is right what happened, but kudos to him for admitting to it.

    I have a blackberry and I don't even try to navigate it while my car is moving, but I have been guilty of checking my text messages at a stop light...my GPS is more distracting to me when I am looking at it and wondering WTF as it tells me to take some street that makes no sense.....

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 10:08am
  • Texting?

    by Erik Balderson

    Just because it was a Blackberry doesn't mean that he was texting or checking email.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 11:35am
    • Re: Texting?

      by Chunky Vomit

      I was waiting for somebody to point this out.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 1:16pm
    • Re: Texting?

      by Luci

      Well, except for the linked article that states he 'glanced down at his BlackBerry to view newspaper headlines and e-mails.' Could have been a newspaper, would have been the same thing. The fact that he wasn't texting saved him from that ticket.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Mar 30th, 2009 @ 10:23am
  • Ok

    by Mikecancook

    The problem isn't the phone. Has no one here with an automatic transmission ever rolled forward without intending to? I remember in high school driving my grandma's automatic and, since I was used to driving a stick, rolled into the car in front of me. Accidents happen.

    Looking at his phone, changing the radio station, checking out the blond hippy, whatever.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 10:24am
  • by Lucretious

    so, are any of the anti cell-phone-while-driving-law folks (who seem to be legion here) want to comment on the obvious?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 10:32am
    • Re:

      by Anonymous Coward

      Lucretious, I dont think that anyone is actually blaming the phone. Most people here are blaming the fact that because of this "law", that the ones who are put forward to enforce it (the police) are not doing that job... even when it comes to their own miss-use. This is defined by The Law in that state.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 4:10pm
      • Re: Re:

        by Lucretious

        I understand the point of Mike's post.

        I found the story ironic and I'm just asking folks who seem to be against any type of law that would prohibit cell phone use while driving (again, there seem to be many here) what they have to say about how this particular person got into an accident doing exactly what the laws are meant to deter.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Mar 30th, 2009 @ 10:45am
  • stuped police chief

    by yer maw

    i think that man sould be put in jial for that, setting a bad example for younger people like 18 or 19 year olds who dont know any better

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 11:38am
  • Can You Hear Me Now

    by Anonymous Coward

    The fact that he bumped another vehicle is secondary. The fact that he admitted to the cell phone use while driving infraction is commendable, but that does little to change the fact that he should not have been doing something that is considered illegal for everyone. I am not aware of a provision that exempts the police force from the cell phone use while driving law, is there one?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 11:49am
  • Accident

    by NullOp

    Firstly, I always wondered what happened to the "Beach Boys". Now I see Brian Wilson is a chief of police. I guess he got her out of his head...

    Secondly, everyone can make mistakes!

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 12:12pm
  • Fun fun fun...

    by Sam Becket

    Daddy should have taken his t-bird away.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 12:15pm
  • Two B's

    by mobiGeek

    For future reference, it is Black_B_erry, not Blackberry.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 12:17pm
  • Little known fact about the anti-texting law

    by Anonymous Coward

    It's a secondary offense so you can't get pulled over for it. Though really, given reckless driving laws it seems to be a redundant point.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 12:33pm
  • MEDIA!

    by Anonymous Coward

    why isnt the media all over this like WHITE ON RICE!!!!!?>>>>>????

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 2:54pm
  • by Anonymous Coward

    time to outlaw Police'ing. To dangerous.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Mar 30th, 2009 @ 10:24pm
  • Talk about corruption

    by Anonymous Coward

    In-your-face proof of corruption right here, folks!

    Brian Wilson is a SCHMUCK!! He should be dragged through the mud just as he himself exercises the power to do to the "plain ol' citizen" that's guilty of the same thing.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 4th, 2009 @ 9:10am
  • hypocrisy from police, no!

    by Rosa

    more proof that DWT laws are unenforceable. i wonder if the crash looked like this: http://www.newsy.com/videos/texting_and_driving_your_right_or_a_new_way_to_crash

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It