Get Overly Aggressive With Your Trademark… And Watch Your Reputation Fall
from the can't-be-good-for-business dept
We wrote recently about how an author and her lawyer appeared to be quite overaggressive in trying to enforce the trademark on the title of a book she had written. As someone pointed out in the comments on that post, as the story has grown more popular, many people are coming out of the woodwork to express their displeasure with the book in the Amazon reviews. So, once again, it’s a case where being overly aggressive on trademark is doing significant harm to business prospects.
Imagine, instead, if Susan Jeffers, rather than having her lawyer send a letter demanding credit, had simply emailed the author of the original blog post and said “Hey, this is a great blog post, and I’ve written this book you might be interested in, which even uses that same phrase you mentioned, ‘feel the fear and do it anyway.’ I’m sure you’d like the book, so let me send you a copy. Thanks!” Think what might have happened? The blogger would likely have been interested, seeing as the topic of the book is similar to what he writes about, and he might even write a review or mention her book positively in future blog posts. But, instead, she jumped to the legal route, and is now suffering the consequences.
Filed Under: reputation, susan jeffers, trademark
Comments on “Get Overly Aggressive With Your Trademark… And Watch Your Reputation Fall”
going the lawyer route
Everyone knows not to call out the lawyers but she did it anyway and now she’s feeling the fear.
Hmm
I imagine her lawyer as Ted from Scrubs…
Re: Hmm
Lawsuit-five!
Re: Re: Hmm
For the Big Dog.
Even better example is the recent news stories about Monster Cable having to slash prices because of there negative name in recent trade lawsuits and with Circuit city gone they lost one of there largest distribution channels
Re: Re:
You’re not THE Zero Cool are you?
Re: Re: Re:
I’m kind of ashamed of it, but dammit I love that movie.
A dash of irony
Most of the negative reviews are legitimate looking enough to avoid being deleted… these cracked me up though:
Robert Riddle – “A bland and overly generic book, just a repeat of ideas I’ve heard many times. Looks like the author just took a bunch of ideas that have been around forever and decided to write them down as if they were her own.”
And Frettful “J” – “[…] Oh by the way, I’m pending a copyright for this comment. This will be a registered trademark, and so if you wish to use this phrase for any purpose whatsoever, you are required to contact me.”
Oh crap… I better email Frettful “J”…
And this is why I stay the hell away from reviews.
In looking at the one star reviews, it’s no coincidence most were posted about the same time the negativity about the copyright was placed.
Sure, there’s a correlation, but when most of those reviews are stupid one-liners, there’s no way I’d take those as “reviews”.
Just bullshit.
The entire point of a review is to convey the opinion of the material at hand.
Anyone who takes these one-liners as a “review” is a complete moron.
Re: And this is why I stay the hell away from reviews.
But are they a moron in a hurry? Isn’t that the real question?
Re: Re: And this is why I stay the hell away from reviews.
>But are they a moron in a hurry? Isn’t that
>the real question?
These Lawyers are professional moron’s in a hurry to build up billable hours.
Re: And this is why I stay the hell away from reviews.
It’s not hard to convey large amounts of information in a one line review.
Re: Re: And this is why I stay the hell away from reviews.
I tell you what!
Re: And this is why I stay the hell away from reviews.
These reviews hold a lot of sway for many people. Even if her book was the best thing written in the last 100 years, if I read a bunch of reviews on Amazon talking about how the author is a copyright NAZI I’d pass on their book in a second. It’s the same thing with all the negative reviews of PC games that use DRM, who cares if the game is good or bad, I won’t support DRM.
Re: And this is why I stay the hell away from reviews.
Morons are usually too stupid to see the irony of “just bullshit” being a one line opinion that also conveys no information.
Re: And this is why I stay the hell away from reviews.
Did you look at the 5 star reviews with the wall of text? Just because they had words, doesn’t mean they actually conveyed anything. Most of the positive reviews provide nothing except for “Wow! I love reading self help books and I liked this one too! Wee!” Or even blatantly provide a positive review to have a plug for own self help book. Either way, the point is that the author is suffering the consequences of being stupid.
Actually, Jeffers' reputation isn't in that much trouble.
After all, a fall from a very low height can’t do a lot of damage.
Re: Actually, Jeffers' reputation isn't in that much trouble.
depends on how/where you land…. (sorry “J”)
One line reviews
I think the people mentioning the one-line reviews are overlooking a very important fact: A very large number of Amazon’s customers do not read the reviews at all, they just look at the overall star rating. For those people the one-line reviews are just as effective as a well thought out, paragraph-long review.
I love watching overzealous copyright holders shoot themselves in the foot. Or, more accurately, they get shot in the foot by their own lawyers.
Sentence squatting is the new domain squatting.(R)
bad review SPAMing
All those reviews were probably written by the same person, or numerous of them were written by the same person. basically “bad review” spamming. Also, notably all the negative one star reviews start when techdirt made note of it on april 27th, not april 26th when the original blogger posted about it…
Re: bad review SPAMing
This was the 4th place I saw the story on the 27th.
Feel the review
“feel the fear and do it anyway” is the work of a woman with an insane sense of entitlement, and possibly clinical OCD issues. Based on her poor understanding of trademark law, I’d avoid any advice that comes from her.
YMMV
Is “feel the fear” equivalent to “smell the glove”?
A few days ago it had over 100 “one star” reviews… Now it has just over 50… It might be another glitch…
It might be a reach to say that the action caused significant harm to this author. Who had heard of the book before doing so? If there were no sales (or the sales that would ultimately going to be made have already taken place) and then the bad reviews started, then it doesn’t really make a difference.
Who knows, the bad publicity might have sold more books.
I seem to remember...
…someone saying that any attention is good attention, even if the attention is negative.
Re: I seem to remember...
The attention just happens to be good for the consumer in this scenario.
You'll need to be an idiot
Yes this women is totally wrong for going after the blogger, but putting in false reviews isn’t right. Sure, give her 1 star for her actions and mention that, but don’t tell lies about the book. Let people make up their own mind, if they want to support a copyright nazi or not.
Reviews like this
check it out, this book was so trite and useless that I actually recieved more help from a homeless man that I had given a nickle to. He was more helpful than this book and when I tried to offer it to him, he balked and spat at my feet as if I had insulted by my precieved gesture of kindness. Nonetheless I fell disheartened from this exchange and felt the need to tell the savy consumers of Amazon that this book will only be useful if you enjoy reading regurgitated common ideas. […]
Are so obviously made up, and no one will believe them, but some people may find this book useful. You’re only hurting them if you steer them away with lies