Bell Canada Shuts Down Crappy Video Store That No One Used… But It's Still Throttling
from the well-look-at-that dept
Just about a year ago, we pointed out that Bell Canada was facing scrutiny for its decision to force traffic shaping on all of its resellers, often without letting them know… and yet, at nearly the same time, it launched its own crappy online video store. The whole thing seemed odd. First, Bell claimed it needed to shape traffic to deal with congestion… but then it had no problem launching its own video store that would have no traffic shaping. That certainly seems like anticompetitive behavior. Yet, as we pointed out at the time, it was difficult to believe that the Bell online video store would get any usage at all. It had an extremely limited selection, high prices and buggy Microsoft DRM. What a bargain?
Apparently, it took all of a year for Bell Canada to realize that it wasn’t getting any use whatsoever, and Joe McEnaney points out that Bell Canada has quietly shut down the site… though, it’s still throttling traffic from resellers. Maybe, next time, instead of trying to limit competitors and offer something crappy, Bell could spend its resources investing in bandwidth. That would have made everyone a lot happier.
Filed Under: canada, online video, throttling
Companies: bell canada
Comments on “Bell Canada Shuts Down Crappy Video Store That No One Used… But It's Still Throttling”
Taking another week and a half off to see first hand how they do this stuff in Sweden.
If a tree falls in the forest ——————. It seems that monopoly really is not a business model.
Re: Re:
Since Bell isn’t a monopoly (at worst a duopoly, but realistically a triopoly), your point is meaningless.
Customers always have a choice, and with the arrival of 3.5g services in many areas, the choices just got bigger.
Re: Re: Re:
isn’t bell the one who holds the monopoly on all the tier 1 ISP’s and throttled them recently?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Nope. Bell controls ONLY the DSL, and only in parts of Canada. DSL resellers all get treated the same way.
Bell has no control over cable, sat-link, wireless, or 3.5g wireless.
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
Nope. Bell controls ONLY the DSL, and only in parts of Canada.
So, Bell holds a monopoly over DSL in those areas.
choice
unfortunately it’s not much of a choice when everyone is throttling or leasing bandwidth from a throttling company.
Something all businesses in their position should learn...
They’re in the business of providing bandwidth, not in the business of providing something nobody wants and taking away what they do want.
The truth is, no major ISP will see increased profit from a stunt like this. What they gain in online video viewings, they’ll lose in monthly internet subscriptions if they traffic shape.
Not to mention the other truth, which is that most people with connections fast enough to stream online movies once a time for a fee already know they can stream them elsewhere infinitely for free.
re:re:
They’re in the business of providing bandwidth, not in the business of providing something nobody wants and taking away what they do want.
The truth is, no major ISP will see increased profit from a stunt like this. What they gain in online video viewings, they’ll lose in monthly internet subscriptions if they traffic shape.
Not to mention the other truth, which is that most people with connections fast enough to stream online movies once a time for a fee already know sikiş they can stream them elsewhere infinitely for free.