RSS
Twitter
Malaysia Looking To Copyright Food?
from the this-again? dept
Last year, around this time, we noted that the country of Lebanon was trying to claim that it owns hummus and other middle eastern foods, such as falafel, tabouleh and baba gannouj, and that no other country could produce them. It seems that other parts of the world are seeing the same sort of thing, as Malaysia is trying to declare that it owns popular Malaysian dishes, like nasi lemak. It doesn't seem entirely clear what this means, and the article is a bit vague (the title mentions "copyright," but the rest of the article does not). Still, it's certainly yet another sign of the times, when it feels natural to some people to do totally ridiculous things in claiming "ownership" of ideas.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
At least no one has tried to copyright the idea of having an idea. There seems to be limits to the ridiculousness.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
No - wrong tag
The actual problem here seems to be sloppy reporting by guess who?
I don't think copyright enters into it, although trademark might, like with Champagne or Stilton. Generally I don't find such things offensive although maybe the Champagne one goes a bit too far since it outlaws "Methode Champenoise" ie you can't even describe a wine as being made the same way.
In this case though even trademark looks a bit dubious since they aren't protecting local produce but are trying to reserve a recipe. If a top Malaysian chef travels to New York can he not cook Nasi Lemak?
However, reading the story I don't think that's what they're trying to do. It looks more a cultural advertising offensive to me - combined with a bit of sharp elbowing of their neighbours - a bit like the Greek/Turkish coffee thing.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: No - wrong tag
once ideas like "Trademark" go global they make no sense. This is why people need to realize that both patents and trademark in their fullest are not going to fit going forward in our society at all. What happens when 2-3 people around the global come up with something at once as Mike has cited before, what happens if two companies call their products anything remotely related to an apple? etc.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I think it's very stupid to claim that you own some kind of food.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
Sorry but I make the best Baby Back Ribs. Henceforth, everyone else must pay a licensing fee to me to make them. Also, no one is allowed to make fajitas anymore.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
No problem if what you trademark is "Zaven's Baby Back Ribs" - but "Baby Back Ribs" is too generic.
(ps Are they made from real babies?)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re:
yes ;)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re:
I'm pretty sure I could trademark Zaven's anything and have it be specific enough. I've never even met another Zaven.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
European laws..........
There are many such laws in EU. Eg. Whiskey not produced in scotland may not be labeled "scotch".
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: European laws..........
Champagne, Roquefort cheese, ......
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: European laws..........
Actually Whiskey (with the e) is (usually) Irish.
Scotch Whisky doesn't have an e in it.
I don't see a problem with regional food trademarking - provided it doesn't go beyond what is necessary for clarity.
No - one is being prevented from making Whisky - you just can't call it "Scotch" if it is in fact made in Mumbai.
and by the way - don't steal the Budweiser name from the Czechs and then try and claim that you own it and they can't use it!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: European laws..........
Around here most whiskey, with or without the damned 'e', is from Kentucky. Yeah, Irish and Scotch whisk(e)ys are good, but 'whiskey' isn't always 'Irish.' Or good.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Champagne
You mean like Champagne. To be Champagne it has to be produced within the Champagne region of France. Otherwise it is just a sparkling wine.
Through international treaty, national law or quality-control/consumer protection related local regulations, most countries limit the use of the term to only those wines that come from the Champagne appellation.
So why not do this to other foods/beverages? Precedence has already been set.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Champagne
I remember way back in the 80s, the Champagne control board in France sued Canada Dry ginger ale because they called themselves "The champagne of ginger ales" in marketing.
They won.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
this thread
I've copyrighted this thread. Don't post on it. I also copyright cats and dogs, so stop selling them, unless you pay me. wah!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
What they want is an international AOC: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appellation_d%27origine_contr%C3%B4l%C3%A9e
It might not be a bad idea if implemented properly.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Maybe the Brits should claim that "curry" can only be cooked and eaten in the UK w/o a license?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I call dibs on milk!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Copyrighting in maldives
we are going to copyright Garudhiya and Rihaakuru in the Maldives
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I copyright empty space, on earth and in space!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Hmm what to choose what to choose
Anyone called dibs on beer yet?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
jesus h christ... now it's official
Apparently idiocy TRULY IS a disease, and it's become a worldwide epidemic. ...
Jesus, who the f*** are these morons to even come up with this s***???????
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Here is their tourism minister blog:
http://blog.drngyenyen.com/?p=531
She said that "Hainanese Chicken Rice" is Malaysian, while you know, Hainan is part of China. Silly or stupid or both?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
hainan is part of china but hainanese chicken rice is not from china. this is because, when the hainanese people mmigrated to malaysia they needed something to survive on and that is when they created chicken rice which is now famous in malaysia as hainanese chicken rice.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Mexico Has Prior Art!
Their "chili crabs" are cooked in a tomato-chili sauce base. Neither of those ingredients is native to SouthEast Asia. They came from Mexico with the Spanish ships in the 1500s or 1600s.
Mexico has prior art and IP claims on the concept of cooking with chilis, chocolate, vanilla, avocados, tomatoes, turkeys, and corn. Peru has IP claims on cooking with potatoes.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The Solution
Hey, I once lived in Malaysia. Perhaps I can help.
"like nasi lemak. It doesn't seem entirely clear what this means"
It means rice cooked in cream.
Glad I could be of help. ;-)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: The Solution
the direct translation to nasi lemak means rice fats. but it is actually rice cooked with coconut cream and served with traditional sambal, fried anchovies, boiled egg and cucumber.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
claim food?
before this, malaysia trying to claim batik and pendet dance from indonesia. what a stupid thing? malaysia... what do you want?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment