RSS
Twitter
Dear PR People: If Your Exec Has A Comment, Our Comments Are Open
from the so-please-use-them dept
One of the points we've tried to make around here regularly is that this blog is not a traditional journalism effort. I am not a "reporter." I do not go out seeking stories to report on. I write about what I find interesting and I give my opinion on it -- and I do so in a way where I expect a discussion to happen in our comments from which we can all learn. I find that to be a lot better of an experience for everyone involved than to go out talking to a bunch of people behind closed doors and then writing up a "one true report" on the matter that probably leaves out half of the interesting stuff. Instead, I post what seems interesting and the comments are then very much a part of the story.
I've written many times before that we get more than enough stories sent to us by readers -- and I find plenty of interesting stories myself. I can't think of a single case where a PR person has turned me onto a PR story that I've cared about and hadn't already seen elsewhere. But PR people still fill my inbox daily with stories about all sorts of stuff we'd never write about, because they clearly don't read the site. They assume that any tech story is automatically relevant, so they spam me and probably 100 other sites. Perhaps some of them care and find the emails useful, though I doubt it.
In the last year or two, there's been a growing number of PR people who have moved on to a new tactic. Since actually getting press to cover the company you're representing is difficult, they now send around emails to writers about certain news stories, saying that so-and-so exec at such-and-such company, which has absolutely nothing to do with the story at hand, is "available for comment" on this story. So, for example, if two big companies announce a partnership, a PR person will send an email saying that some startup CEO in a market impacted by that partnership (barely), is "available for comment" about that partnership. It's basically a desperate PR person's attempt to get some press for a client where none is warranted.
Except, of course, we never quote people for posts here. We're not reporters. We're not looking for sources. We write about our opinions on stories and that's it. We'll quote another article, in order to comment on it, but we're not looking for sources at all. If you read Techdirt, you'd know that.
I recently put a message on Twitter about this, saying that, for all the PR people who had someone "available for comment" on stories, the comments on Techdirt are enabled and open for them to comment on any story they feel is relevant. It got a really good response on Twitter, so I figured I'd expand on it into a post. If you are a PR person, and you represent someone who has "a comment" on a particular story, please point them to the site where they are free to comment away, along with everyone else, as a part of a conversation, not some PR effort. And, please don't be offended if I just emailed you a link to this post in response to your offer to have some random exec "comment" on some unrelated story.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Name & Shame
Seriously, compile a list of these spammers so that others can see who's spamming and filter out the garbage before it ever has a chance to reach the inbox.
If they're spamming you and don't realise that their PR crap isn't relevant then it's pretty foolish of you to waste the time and the space that this 564-word open letter required. Unless you're also announcing that you will indeed name these douchebags and display their headers so that the rest of us can block them.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Wrong approach
Usually PR people have budgets to work with. Maybe Mike shouldn't have written this post, and instead pointed them to the "Theme of the Week" idea.
http://techdirt.com/rtb.php?tid=1200
Or maybe Mike should make a "Theme of the Day" level. Either way, telling them to go away doesn't allow us to debate it, and secondly, sends people to more snarky sites such as MG Siegler's TechCrunch.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Wrong approach
Yeah, MG Siegler, CEO of TechCrunch, is doing a good job of getting guest authors over there.
I bet they have a larger audience also, besides MG Siegler and his VP Paul Carr need another bottle of scotch.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Wrong approach
"MG Siegler's TechCrunch"
now that's funny.
m3mnoch.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
You want them to WHAT?!
An Exec, come here and mingle with the commoners in the comments?!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: You want them to WHAT?!
"An Exec, come here and mingle with the commoners in the comments?!"
While I agree with your sentiments, I wouldn't define most of the commentors here as "common". Myself included....
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Name & Shame
Naming them gives them attention. It's more of a punishment to keep them unknown.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: You want them to WHAT?!
Noone is common and everyone is common at the same time. It actually does make sense - especially since we all are unique.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: You want them to WHAT?!
We're unique and special, just like everybody else.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
they get more respect for having the balls to risk commenting here
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Re: You want them to WHAT?!
"We're unique and special, just like everybody else."
Like snowflakes? Or orgasms?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
That would be great to have an exec commenting on the boards with their name broadcast right next to it. How many times to do you think that it would be revised by their own PR department before it got cleared.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: You want them to WHAT?!
Like all of the dark helmets that rode the short bus to school.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The real issue?
The problem is surely a matter of control. If you go and ask them for comment on an issue they are the ones in control of the conversation and their word has weight, if they were to come to the comment and threads and voice their opinion there then they have surrendered that weight. No matter where the conversation is the opinion of so many executives will surely only be given following that consideration...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Well, maybe no.
We prefer to lurk in the shadows and strike without sound.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: You want them to WHAT?!
wow, that was un-warranted meanness.
dooche
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
The PR people want the same sort of time that you gave the original story, not a comment 50 names down a list. They aren't interested in fighting from a poorly created defensive position.
Mike, perhaps you might want to "start a conversation" about their points as well, although I gather that their ideas and comments would go against the techdirt party line most of the time.
I guess it's only a conversation when you can lead it where you want it to go, right?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: You want them to WHAT?!
My unique and special feature is meanness. It was aimed at DH as a joke, not as meanness toward those that really need a special bus to get to school. Relax.
-El Dooche
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
Mike, perhaps you might want to "start a conversation" about their points as well, although I gather that their ideas and comments would go against the techdirt party line most of the time.
Heh. I think you have misread the post. It has nothing to do with the opinions on Techdirt. Most don't know that Techdirt is an opinion site at all. They don't read it. They just know that Techdirt is a popular "tech" blog, and so they have some startup client and they want to get him press, so when, say, Microsoft and Yahoo do a deal, they send an email about how "the CEO of blahblahlame.com is available to comment on the partnership" because they're hoping that I'm a lazy journalist who needs to fill column inches and will accept some bland stupid quote from someone, so that the PR people can go back to the company at the end of the month and include "Techdirt" as one of the press hits they got.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
Ahh, so this is different from not allowing the other side to speak. Got it.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: The real issue?
Not all comments carry the same weight. Mike's comments quite often drive the conversation a lot more than others. Part of that is the blue box, but not all of it. Were an "executive" to participate in a conversation, noting themselves as who they are and depending on their current level of visibility in the sector the article is relevant too, their comments may also drive the conversation more and increase their visibility/popularity.
I can't think of a specific example, but I imagine there may be some good fits for articles to executives to weigh in on and gain some "street cred", even if its a dissenting opinion.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: You want them to WHAT?!
Plus I thought it was funny, though I appreciate posters getting my helmety back ;)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Mike, this is an excellent post that PR people and the people they represent should take very seriously. They're losing in the court of public opinion if they take conversations offline rather than responding with authentic, rational arguments to the points raised by reasonable bloggers like yourself.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: You want them to WHAT?!
'helmety back' - love it. At least one can shave a hairy back, but a turtlely back just is what it is. Bet you never have a bad hair day, DH.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: You want them to WHAT?!
Well, not that you can see anyway ;)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Socrates style
I'm rather new around here. I've only been coming here for a few months. The feeling I get about Techdirt is it's like back in Socrates's time in Greek history when they'd sit around and talk about.... well, anything of importance, or interest, to them.
I enjoy most of the stories I've read here, and the comments give life to those stories.
I believe that most exec's could do well by their company by visiting here and joining relevant discussions. It'd be like the wise king that dresses like everyone else and goes among the people to find out how they feel.
Not that I'm saying anyone here is a 'commoner' or 'peasant' lmao. It's the feeling that Mike, Techdirt and people like DH bring to the 'Plaza' or table. Those people include everyone... well, except maybe the kids from the *aa's....
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment