RSS
Twitter
Twitter Defamation Lawsuit Dismissed, As Tweets Were Considered Too Vague
from the keeping-it-vague dept
Last year, we wrote about how a property management firm in Illinois, Horizon Group Management, had sued a tenant for defamation over a short Twitter message she sent, claiming:
"Who said sleeping in a moldy apartment was bad for you? Horizon realty thinks it's okay."The woman had a grand total of 20 followers at the time, so it wasn't like this was likely to have a huge negative impact on the company. Still, what was impressive was how Horizon defended its decision to sue, saying:
"We're a sue first, ask questions later kind of an organization."That seemed rather obvious, given that by filing the lawsuit, the company brought a lot more attention to the fact that some of its tenants were unhappy. And, even worse, the lawsuit has gone nowhere. Dark Helmet alerts us to the news that the lawsuit has been dismissed as the comments were considered "too vague" and didn't meet the qualifications to be considered libelous. This doesn't mean that there can't be defamation via Twitter, so if you're going to defame someone, at least be vague about it in your 140 characters.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
It's not defamation if it is true.
(reply to this) (link to this) (view in thread)
Good, I hate these douchebags that frivolously file dumb lawsuits...FU!
(reply to this) (link to this) (view in thread)
Good, I hate these douchebags that frivolously file dumb lawsuits...FU!
(reply to this) (link to this) (view in thread)
Good, I hate these douchebags that frivolously file dumb lawsuits...FU!
(reply to this) (link to this) (view in thread)
Surely the "sue first" comment can be the basis of a countersuit for harassment.
(reply to this) (link to this) (view in thread)
Translation
"We're a sue first, ask questions later kind of an organization."
Translation:
My son inlaws a lawyer
(reply to this) (link to this) (view in thread)
Defamation
TechDirt hates Kayne West.
(reply to this) (link to this) (view in thread)
Re: Defamation
"TechDirt hates Kayne West."
Dark Helmet agrees with TechDirt....
(reply to this) (link to this) (view in thread)
"This doesn't mean that their can't be defamation via Twitter"
Should probably be
"This doesn't mean that there can't be defamation via Twitter"
Glad the suit was dismissed. Though, since Twitter is only a communications platform, it's no different from any other platform. Libel comes from the communication, not the platform. You can be libelous in a newspaper, a leaflet, on television, or through a Twitter post. It's what you say, not where you say it.
(reply to this) (link to this) (view in thread)
Re:
Oops. Typo fixed. Thanks.
(reply to this) (link to this) (view in thread)
Re: Translation
I have long argued for freedom
of information in the Internet...
but the copyright thing is complicated.
I wish that it were designed a clever
system of interaction holders and torrents.
BUY AMBIEN
(reply to this) (link to this) (view in thread)
Add Your Comment