Is A Captcha DRM? Craigslist Wins Default Judgment Claiming Yes

from the uh-oh... dept

Last year, we wrote about a troubling set of lawsuits filed by Craigslist that seemed very dangerous, as it was pushing the boundaries on a series of legal concepts, all of which could come back to haunt Craigslist (and others) at a later date. For example, we noted that there was a “weak” DMCA claim that said that the captchas used by Craigslist to get people to prove they were human were actually “technological protection measures,” and circumventing them violated the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA. While it’s not the same lawsuit (apparently Craigslist had filed even more such lawsuits), Ray Dowd has the details of Craigslist winning a default judgment in a similar lawsuit after the company sued didn’t bother to defend itself. This is why the concept of default judgments always concerns me. Now we have a ruling on the books that finds captchas are like DRM, and getting around them even if for perfectly legal purposes (can’t read ’em?) may count as violating the DMCA.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: craigslist

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Is A Captcha DRM? Craigslist Wins Default Judgment Claiming Yes”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
R. Miles (profile) says:

Oh, good grief.

Captchas are the dumbest things I’ve ever seen implemented as a “security” measure. If a site’s that concerned over spam posts, then maybe it shouldn’t offer the option.

Yes, this includes Craigslist. It’s not as though spam posts aren’t included with the captcha anyway.

I enjoyed the “can’t read them” remark, given so many are designed so badly (to circumvent scripts which can read them) they’re more annoying than they are helpful, especially with those few sites which cancel the request after two-three failed attempts.

It could be worse, I guess. They could all be Flash based.

zenith (profile) says:

Talk about a misnomer...

Digital Rights Management… er…

Captacha is not;

Digitial – it uses analog eyeballs as the determinating factor, and the analog human fingers as a converter to digital (via keyboard).

Rights – being identified as human via capcha does not award a “right”, in the sense that a Gorilla that passes as capcha doesn’t award them the “rights” of being identified as a “human”.

Management – not managed in any sense, but totally on-the-fly.

Jason Buberel (profile) says:

Re: Talk about a misnomer...

I disagree about the inapplicability of the DMCA’s anti-circumvention provisions to CAPTACHA.

The anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA was intended to criminalize attempts to remove or bypass any security scheme from a digital product in order to gain unlawful access to a product.

This has been applied to the reverse engineering of hardware and software in the last few years. Although originally intended to protect entertainment media (music, movies, books), there is no reason the protections could not in principle be extended to a service such as Craigslist.com.

Or so I think. But I am not a lawyer.

Anonymous Coward says:

“Ray Dowd has the details of Craigslist winning a default judgment in a similar lawsuit after the company sued didn’t bother to defend itself. This is why the concept of default judgments always concerns me.”

You get sued and can’t be bothered defending yourself, right or wrong, you fucking deserve what you get. If the concept of default judgments didn’t exist, you could sue someone, they tell you to go fuck yourself, don’t show up in court, then what? You chase them until you run out of money?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

You get sued and can’t be bothered defending yourself, right or wrong, you fucking deserve what you get.

You get sued and can’t afford to defend yourself, right or wrong, you fucking deserve what you get. (I can’t stand poor people, unless they’re mowing my lawn or washing my car or something like that.)

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...