Techdirt is off for the holidays! We'll be back soon, and until then don't forget to 
As Expected, Rosetta Stone Loses Badly To Google In Claiming Trademark Violations For AdWords
from the when-will-these-lawsuits-stop? dept
There have been so many baseless lawsuits against Google for selling trademarked keywords as part of its AdWords program, that you would think lawyers would recommend against even bothering. Google always wins — as it should. First of all, despite what some people believe, trademark does not give you complete control over the mark. The purpose of trademark law is to avoid consumer confusion. More recently the whole “dilution” theory has been tacked on to trademark law as well, but that is still somewhat limited. Beyond that, if there is consumer confusion in an AdWords ad, Google is still the wrong party to sue. Instead, the liability belongs on whoever created the confusing ad.
While a lot of the more recent such cases have been from smaller companies, a lot more attention was paid to the news that language software firm Rosetta Stone sued Google over this issue last year. Eric Goldman, who’s been tracking all of these types of lawsuits against Google, has a detailed discussion on the judge’s ruling throwing out Rosetta Stone’s case and giving a pretty complete victory to Google. Goldman notes that there are a few problems with the ruling, but it gets the big questions right. Now, hopefully, lawyers and companies will finally start to realize there’s nothing illegal about Google selling ads on your trademarked terms.
Filed Under: adwords, trademark
Companies: google, rosetta stone
Comments on “As Expected, Rosetta Stone Loses Badly To Google In Claiming Trademark Violations For AdWords”
Hrrm
from the when-will-these-lawsuits-stop? dept
More like, from the when will they stop paying lawyers who keep billing for busy-work dept.
Money to burn. Lawsuit are becoming a business investment.
Lawsuit are becoming a business investment.
Seems like it – and this one, is obviously a bad one.
Rosetta Stone vs Google
Piracy is theft. Shoplifting is theft. So how did Rosetta Stone settle the petty larceny charge involving the mother of their Legal Counsel at a Safeway store in Mclean last September? The arrest was published in The McLean Ear with a headline “McLean Residents Arrested for Week Ending Sept. 30” and the hearing for this case was on February 1st. Google should do an investigation on this matter.
Bad Business
If Rosetta Stone’s legal team will come forward with theft arrests and lawsuits, they have to make sure that they are NOT in trouble themselves. Theft is a serious crime and there’s no way around it. Unless your son is a Lawyer???
I don’t understand something. Who got arrested shoplifting? I thought Rosetta Stone is a big company. Give us more information please.