After Hundreds Of 'Empire State Of Mind' Parodies… Why Does EMI Suddenly Take One Down?
from the these-copyrights-will-inspire-you dept
Nearly a year ago, the Jay-Z/Alicia Keys collaboration Empire State of Mind was released. If you haven’t heard it, you’ve been living under something of a rock:
| The Colbert Report | Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| Alicia Keys – Empire State of Mind (Part II) Broken Down | ||||
|
||||
Even odder? Apparently EMI has issued a takedown notice for just that one video pulling it off YouTube. This is despite literally hundreds of Empire State of Mind parodies on YouTube. Those 55 best parodies? They’re all on YouTube (with the exception of the Darth Vader one…). Honestly, I thought this had to be a mistake, or some weird Content ID error by YouTube. Considering the vast number of these parodies that have all remained up this whole time, would EMI really issue a takedown for this one parody?
However, EMI seems to have confirmed that it’s taken down the video. According to the BBC report:
A statement from EMI said: “When a song is created based wholly on any of our writers’ works, those writers need to grant their permission.
“If that permission isn’t granted, then we ask the service in question to remove the song.”
And what about all those other parodies? And, of course, at least in the US, parody is often protected as fair use. I recognize this particular parody was done in Wales, but, still, the decision to take down this one video seems really, really odd.
Oh, and one other bit of irony? In looking up some of these parodies, I found this article, which notes that the key musical hook used by Jay-Z and Alicia Keys are sampled from a 1970s track from The Moments called Love on A Two Way Street:
Filed Under: alicia keys, empire state of mind, jay-z, parody, takedown
Companies: emi
Comments on “After Hundreds Of 'Empire State Of Mind' Parodies… Why Does EMI Suddenly Take One Down?”
been hiding all this time.
well, consider me a rock dweller.
Re: been hiding all this time.
like omigod how could u have not heard that song?!!!?
Re: Re: been hiding all this time.
Shows how unimportant music really is to some people.
Re: Re: Re: been hiding all this time.
not so much that music isn’t important as this genre isn’t.
Re: Re: Re:2 been hiding all this time.
Same here. I don’t care about this genre (or major label music in general), so I’m not familiar with the song, either.
Re: Re: Re:3 been hiding all this time.
Agreed. I mean, if Justin Bieber isn’t singing it, I’m not listening….
Re: Re: Re:3 been hiding all this time.
Did a search on the song and promotional music last night. I really don’t see what all the fuss is about, its not something I would listen to more than once.
Re: Re: Re: been hiding all this time.
Crappy music is unimportant to a lot of people.
Re: been hiding all this time.
Ditto.
Re: been hiding all this time.
You’re not alone. I barely know who Jay-Z is and I’m not sure about the chick. Is she a newer artist?
Disclaimer: I don’t live under a rock, but I don’t listen to that kind of music (punk rock is where my heart is). The parody was pretty funny, but I wouldn’t listen to it more than once.
Proud member of the Rock Dwellers of America!!
I wonder if they every gave credit(or cash) to the group for using the hook?
Re: Re:
I would assume so. When a major label is putting major money behind a release by major artists, they are generally pretty good about clearing all the samples.
I guess stranger things have happened, though.
Re: Re:
Odds are pretty good that they did pay. However, odds are also good that the beat producer made the whole song using unlicensed samples, and that the label licensed them after the fact. Sample-based hip-hop producers absolutely rely on using unauthorized sounds throughout the creative process.
That’s why a lot of early hip-hop has faced legal issues years after it was released. When albums like BIG’s Ready To Die came out, nobody had really thought much about sampling so the album made it to the shelves without anyone noticing the copyright concerns. Years later (and years after BIG’s death) that album was actually pulled from stores for awhile as the label retroactively sorted out licensing deals.
Another example is Kanye West’s All Falls Down, which uses a chorus by Syleena Johnson. Though it was originally produced with a sample, when it came time to release the album the label discovered it was actually cheaper to hire Syleena to re-record the hook than it was to license the appropriate sample (about 10 seconds) from the existing recording.
Ouch. Ouch. Ouch.
“If you haven’t heard it, you’ve been living under something of a rock.”
Someone please get this rock off me. It hurts.
I didn’t even click the video links.
You know, after shifting a bit to make this post, the rock doesn’t hurt now. Never mind.
I’m going back where it’s safe.
sigh....
This is what the rest of the world see’s when they read this article.
http://tinypic.com/r/2iqdamw/4
It’s like having a youtube embed that says – to watch this video, go to youtube.com. But not telling you which video it is. In other words, f*in useless.
No faults to Mike on this. I know he’s been on the receiving end of it before. Still damn annoying…
End result: The customers just have another reason to not like the recording industry.
But I Like My Rock!
I agree w/ Keven; it’s not a matter of music not being important, just this genre isn’t important to me. It it doesn’t pop up on one of my special-tailored Pandora stations, I don’t hear it.
Never heard of it
Can honestly say I never heard of this song, or the parodies until today. I must not be cool anymore 🙂
Rock / I
(Hip hop is not the only music out there)
They were in need of correcting any way, seems they got Newport mixed up with a few other towns and cities…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx8CZyFM4b4
Do you even need permission to create a parody?? I thought that was one of those things that are protected by fair use?
Re: Re:
It is. Which is why you don’t need permission, you just need a high-priced lawyer and lots of cash.
Oh the noise...
I just pressed play on all of those videos at once. THE NOISE. STOP THE NOISE.
“It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to sue degenerate offspring for copyright infringement, or to let them starve for their obvious musical inability, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…
Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”
The one thing apparent is that, they are using ineffective tools to find infringement and are not bothering to fact check that.
How about suing them for false statements I mean they already know the tools get it wrong but don’t bother checking because there is no penalty for doing so apparently, despite the law being clear about copyfraud.
I think it is professional negligence when those people commit so many errors they are not layman, they are supposed to be trained professionals what are the excuses to get so many things wrong?
Have those professionals no obligation to check anything?
It’s never been so good to live under a rock.
Keys lip sync on the World Series one…..just sayin…
I guess I live under a rock....
I hadn’t heard the song until I clicked the link here, and I can’t say I care for it much. The Star Wars bit looks humorous, but I still don’t like the music.
the best one...
jew york!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtKsaB5xgxI
That's Odd...
Seeing as Nas did a song called ‘New York State of mind’ sixteen years ago (in his debut album Illmatic – best hip-hop album of all time), why would they be issuing takedown orders for a concept that really isn’t their original idea?
Re: That's Odd...
The actual creators never have anything to do with the takedowns. Often enough they are big fans of the parodies, but are powerless to stop the label/whoever owns the rights to the recordings from issuing takedowns. Such was the case with the Downfall Hitler re-captionings, which were praised by nearly everyone involved in the movie but were aggressively targeted by the studio.
Re: Re: That's Odd...
Turns out it was the writers (inc JayZ), not the label, that took it down.
The spoof writers wanted to release it as a charity single and the writers objected.
Re: Re: Re: That's Odd...
Hmm… okay, that *is* interesting. Source? (I’m not doubting you I just want to read more)