AFP Reporters Forced To Fact-Check Wikipedia, Facebook

from the isn't-that-part-of-the-job? dept

Perhaps taking a page from certain universities, the London bureau chief of the Agence France Presse (AFP), Pierre Lesourd, stated that the news agency's reporters are not allowed to use Facebook and Wikipedia as sources. However, Lesourd at least clarified the policy -- saying that reporters can cite any online resources as long as they also refer to other reliable, independent sources to verify the facts. Lesourd announced the AFP's position after the issue came up due to several news agencies being fooled by a fake profile of Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Facebook.

Fortunately, the AFP realizes that fact-checking is an important part of its journalistic mission, but it seems a bit disappointing that this basic principle of responsible news reporting needs to be re-affirmed for "new media" sources. Then again, there will always be mistakes in any kind of research, so the real lesson here may be that there is an equally important basic principle of reading the news: "Don't believe everything you read."

11 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Stupidity

by Carlo Longino

Thu, Sep 6th 2007 2:36pm

News Outlets Decide Not To Give Rugby World Cup Free Publicity

from the have-it-your-way dept

Just earlier today we had a post on how the NFL still thinks it can tell news organizations how they can do their job, in spite of fair use, and well, logic and reason. The Rugby World Cup kicks off Friday, and its organizers are involved in a similar spat with media groups covering the event. Back in April, organizers tried to put restrictions on the number of photos news outlets could publish online, and also how they were published (lest anything cover up a sponsor's logo). Major media outlets, including the AP, Reuters and AFP aren't playing ball, though, and are boycotting the event until the dispute is resolved. As much as the World Cup organizers would like to think they don't care, they depend on widespread media coverage and the free publicity it generates to drive their money machines. They say they're acting to protect companies that have paid for certain broadcasting rights, but what they're really trying to protect are the huge fees these companies have paid. They seem to think that letting news outlets print photos online threaten things like TV rights, but it would seem that the opposite is true. By reducing the amount of news coverage for the event -- which acts as publicity -- they're going to hurt the amount of interest people have in it. In turn, perhaps they won't be nearly as interested to follow it on TV or radio or anywhere else rightsholders have paid to deliver it. That's what really threatens their revenues, not the fact that people can go online and see photos from matches.

10 Comments | Leave a Comment..

Search Techdirt

And now, a word from our Sponsors..

15% off discount for Techdirt Readers

Popular Posts

Poll

Add Techdirt RSS To Your Reader

Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Older Stuff

Monday
11:01am:	Spanish Court Dismisses Complaint From Nintendo Against Counterfiet DS Cartridges, Since They Add Functionality (12)
9:55am:	Dear PR People: If Your Exec Has A Comment, Our Comments Are Open (25)
8:44am:	What Kind Of Mickey Mouse (And Donald Duck) Lawsuits Are These? (23)
7:30am:	Prosecutors Ending Lawsuit Against Lori Drew (13)
6:06am:	Dear Rupert: You Don't Succeed By Making Life More Difficult For Users (70)
4:20am:	ESPN Writer Suspended From Twitter (59)
2:10am:	School Can't Handle Critical Community Message Board; Sends Legal Nastygram (21)
Friday
7:39pm:	Liberian Laws Are A Secret Due To Copyright; Even The Gov't Doesn't Have Them (43)
6:56pm:	Lily Allen: It's Ok To Sell My Counterfeit CDs, Just Don't Give My Music For Free (97)
6:10pm:	EFF Looks To Bust Bogus Podcasting Patent; Needs Prior Art (34)
5:28pm:	Google Blocking Set Top Boxes From Showing YouTube Unless They Pay Up? (64)
4:44pm:	Entertainment Industry: Yes, Please Keep Negotiating Secret Copyright Treaty To Save Our Asses (43)
4:02pm:	If Google's Book Scanning Violates Copyright Law, What About The AP's Book Scanning? (21)
3:05pm:	iPhone App Developer Backlash Growing (49)
2:14pm:	Norwegian Band Told It Can't Post Its Own Music To The Pirate Bay, Even Though It Wants To (24)
1:08pm:	If You Only Share A Tiny Bit Of A File Via BitTorrent, Is It Still Copyright Infringement? (79)
12:00pm:	UK Digital Economy Bill As Bad As Expected; Digital Britain Minister Flat Out Lies About ISP Support (25)
10:57am:	NPR's Daniel Schorr Blames The Internet For Ft. Hood Shootings (37)
9:49am:	No, ACTA Secrecy Is Not 'Normal' -- Nor Is It A 'Distraction' (28)
8:33am:	Murdoch's The Times Accused Of Blatant Copying, Just As It Tells The World You Should Pay For News (28)
7:15am:	Copyright Extension Moves To Japan (24)
5:46am:	Canadian Ebook Store Offers 'Free' Public Domain Ebooks -- Claims Copyright Says You Can Only Make 1 Copy (27)
4:01am:	There Are Lots Of Ways To Fund Journalism (14)
1:49am:	Winner Takes All, Long Tails And The Fractilization Of Culture (10)
Thursday
10:37pm:	The Lobbyists' Ability To Control The Message (29)
8:11pm:	In Going Free, London Evening Standard Doubles Circulation While Slashing Costs (27)
6:10pm:	Senate Exploring Med School Profs Putting Names On Ghostwritten Journal Articles In Favor Of Drugs (22)
4:52pm:	What Does It Say When A Comedy Show Does More Fact Checking Than News Programs? (56)
3:33pm:	Nordic Music Week: Optimism Galore And Found Songs (11)
2:10pm:	Would Top Sites Really Opt-Out Of Google Based On A Microsoft Bribe? (38)

Quick Links

Current Insight Community Cases

AFP Reporters Forced To Fact-Check Wikipedia, Facebook

from the isn't-that-part-of-the-job? dept

News Outlets Decide Not To Give Rugby World Cup Free Publicity

from the have-it-your-way dept

Which Internet Concern Worries You The Most?

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Monday

Friday

Thursday

More