And you need to learn to read a little more closely.
First of all, Masnick isn't the author.
Second of all, being online, even for a few moments a day, is insufficient if you lack the computer skills to harness a botnet.
Finally, if the botnet herder were to be from somewhere besides Africa (a more likely scenario), they'll have trouble using computers in "slums" in their botnet because those computers will be unreliable.
When all you have is a hammer...
See the New Yorker's recent take on it: http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2010/03/01/100301crat_atlarge_menand
The problem with the Israeli focus on 'knowing who you are,' is, obviously, privacy on a more holistic scale than body scanners. Keep in mind that the security measures that have boosted security are not ID-based: reinforced cockpit doors and passengers fighting back.
Actually, Ronald, for countries at a lower level of innovation capacity, increased intellectual property is a tax levied by the developed world on poorer nations.
Here's an interesting post about how innovation may occur at the intersection of constraint and abundance: http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/robert-fabricant/design-4-impact/innovation-crossroads
And I like Ethan Z's thoughts on innovation from constraint: http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2008/11/10/innovation-from-constraint-the-extended-dance-mix/
As HLS Dean, Kagan was a big supporter of the Berkman Center. Hopefully her friendships with those people will lead her to do more like this.
Thanks, Jerry, for catching the error. It's been fixed.
What was the EFF victory against the contracts limiting the first sale doctrine? That should give some firm footing to any malfeasance by public domain limiters.
I wouldn't be so sure, John. See here: http://rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/2009/02/internet-control-without-firewalls.html
Scott,
I do not think that advertisers go to the search engines solely because they are the gateway; after all, Google'e goal and policy is to move people through their site rapidly. People will be spending more time on the newspaper's site as they read the article.
Advertisers like search engines because, as Battelle pointed out in "The Search", searches demonstrate intent - something very valuable to advertisers.
But that still doesn't mean GOOG and NYT are competitors.
Kevin
I, too, have big reservations from a public-interest point of view, but as for monopoly... Amazon is making giant strides in providing a competitor for digital books.
Another reason WSJ can do this is because a lot of companies pay for their people to have access to WSJ. USN&WR doesn't enjoy the same dedicated, rich clientele.
I had a professor who banned students from recording the audio of his class, but he has been the exception to the rule.
But the terrorists, Mike, they'll use the data to attack us!
You sure you didn't find that one in The Onion?
Fergie,
Sorry my comment wasn't addressed, but I meant the straw man remark in regards to the Anonymous Coward saying this was a "minor use of power."
On it not being minor, we are in agreement. And on the good-faith effort made at protecting all Internet users, I am in agreement that this specific incidence was done so.
Again, sorry for the confusion. I think we disagree far less than limited commenting will allow us to recognize.
Kevin
Most human rights experts would agree that "freedom of expression" includes seeking, receiving and expressing information.
"And of course, the information society's very life blood is freedom. It is freedom that enables citizens everywhere to benefit from knowledge, journalists to do their essential work, and citizens to hold their government accountable. Without openness, without the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers, the information revolution will stall, and the information society we hope to build will be stillborn." Kofi Annan
(But please don't think I am arguing McColo lost a human right here. Just a side note on comprehensive free speech protection.)
But when you lose the ability to drive (analogy alert), there is more due process.
But, again, this is only relevant insofar as you see what happened w/ McColo and Atrivo as "minor." At which point we should ask why it should happen at all.
Re: RE: Are Computers in Africa Really Weapons of Mass Destruction?
Fair enough. In the original version of this I noted that forecasting possible downsides of ICTs is a fine exercise: http://blurringborders.com/2010/03/25/are-computers-in-africa-really-weapons-of-mass-destruction/
We just need to do so in a way that is conscious of the situations on-the-ground, and the two pieces to which I wrote in response do not do so.