I don't mind if people want to pay for my photography. But if you choose a license that allows for the relatively free usage of your work, you have no right to complain if someone takes you up on your offer and complies to the license completely.
Then why does the privacy policy itself not reflect this voluntary state of these 'crazy' things? It is very definite about most of them.
I don't agree that I'm overreacting.
Just because the CEO says it is all opt-in, the privacy policy should reflect that, and it doesn't.
The policy basically says: "Don't like these terms, don't use Spotify", also the settings page of Spotify doesn't allow you to opt in or out of anything, except the sharing with third parties, which had been there for a while.
I don't care what this CEO says. I canceled my Spotify account, because this was a giant breach into my privacy.
If it's opt-in have the privacy policy say so. This is clearly them backpedalling after the unanticipated backlash that Spotify received. If there hadn't been that backlash, do you really think they'd be saying "no worries, we meant it all as opt-in. Promise!"? Of course not.
Shooting back isn't the same as shooting first. Only Han Solo should do that. But yeah aiming a gun at a cop is a really bad idea.
Most of my photos are released under CC-BY, a decision I didn't take lightly. And some of them have been used in commercial settings (there's a webshop selling fridge magnets of photos of mine, and several have appeared in magazines and online articles (including one in a cracked.com article)).
It just makes for a more interesting line on my resume: "Internationally published photographer" instead of "Hobbyist fool with a camera".
I'd love to have one of my photos used as the cover of a book/map. I'd buy a copy of that, instantly, or at first ask if I could get one for free.
Is making movies profitable yet? They keep claiming that it isn't. Perhaps they should stop making movies.
You're forgetting Leonard Nimoy's cameos in both movies?
I thought that speedtraps were there so that people would drive slower so that the roads are safer. Apparently I have been very naive and it's all about the benjamins anyway.
Also how is a speedtrap report going to cause a police officer to die?
Can't be, "imprimatur" isn't in the Constitution. Which Pompeo uses for toilet paper.
You're kinda optimistic putting the mechs at $5, given that mere points cost up to $70 on the Dungeon Keeper game, you can expect to pay that much or more for an in-game mech.
I vote for an Axel Foley branch in all Three-Letter-Acronym agencies.
Ok, I'll remove the "e" then.
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss"
Impeaching this sockpuppet will not change anything. US Congress is in the pocket of commercial interests, and will need a serious amount of overhaul before it becomes healthy again. And I don't think this will be possible without a certain amount of bloodshed.
So, you have actual access to the data that Snowden was talking about? Do you work for the NSA?
He only showed that there was such a system in place, and not the actual contents of said system.
Wherein Brain proved to be the insane one. NARF
One thing to keep in mind is that OGL 1.1 was NOT a draft version. It came with contracts to be signed by certain content creators. You don’t do that with draft versions.