After All That Nonsense… Republicans Aren’t Even Using The Spam Backdoor They Forced Google To Create

from the you-did-what-now? dept

Do you remember all the nonsense from earlier this year, in which executives from the Republicans’ favorite spamming operation misread a study about how various email providers handled political mailings and absolutely flipped out? The study didn’t say what they claimed it said: that Google was nefariously sending GOP emails to spam filters. It showed that in an untrained inbox, Google was more likely to declare Republican political messages as spam than Democratic political messages (the same study also showed the opposite for Outlook and Yahoo Mail — those sent more Dem emails to spam than Republicans, but nobody complained about that). Of course, the same study showed that this differential in Gmail went away for anyone who trained their spam filter.

Of course, there was also the fact that Republican emails also… are way more spamlike. Even some of their biggest supporters admit that. Also, their tech talent is weaker, as we noted in a story about how Senator Marco Rubio lost his shit at Google… and only afterwards found out it was because his own tech team botched their email configuration, rather than Google doing anything nefarious.

Either way, Google (somewhat stupidly) caved in to this nonsense pressure after Republicans in Congress introduced a bill that would require all email providers whitelist political spam. In response, Google put forth a pilot program that would whitelist spam from recognized political candidates. The pilot program had to get FEC approval to make sure it wasn’t seen as an illegal in-kind contribution, which allowed the world to weigh in on the program, and they all, almost universally, hated the idea. Of course, the FEC’s determination was based solely on whether or not this was an in-kind contribution (it was not), and thus (begrudgingly) allowed the program to move forward.

So, now that the program has been in effect, I guess it’s time to check in on all those Republicans who demanded exactly this in order to make sure their spam messages go through. And… it turns out that exactly none of them have signed up for the pilot program, according to some reporting by Makena Kelly at The Verge:

A source familiar with the matter confirmed to The Verge that, nearly a month after the pilot’s launch, the RNC has not joined or even applied for the program, even as the party continues to mount political and possibly legal pressure against Google. The RNC did not respond to multiple requests for comment regarding the committee’s decision to abstain from the pilot program.

Perhaps part of the problem is that Google made it clear that it would remove any participant if more than 5% of their whitelisted emails were then flagged as spam, and GOP candidates and their spamming partners know there’s no way they can keep their emails so unspammy that they won’t all be designated as spam anyway.

As that article notes, it’s just a simple fact that Republicans seem to go a bit overboard on the spammy nature of their emails:

The volume of emails sent to individuals by the RNC has risen steadily as the midterms approach, according to data collected by the Archive of Political Emails and viewed by The Verge. Throughout 2020, the organization sent only one or two emails in a day — but by the end of the next year, it was common to see more than 10 emails in a single day and still increasing. For October 2022, the data shows 80 different fundraising calls sent in just the first seven days of the month.

The content of the RNC’s messages can also resemble spam, using misleading subject lines, excessive punctuation, and intimidating language around deadlines to encourage donors to send money immediately upon receiving the message. As part of the January 6th hearings, congressional investigators argued that former President Donald Trump raised more than $250 million for an Election Defense Fund to overturn the 2020 election results that never existed. While the money went to Trump and not the RNC, the committee often structures its emails in a similar style to the Trump campaign.

While the Verge article presents various theories as to why the Republicans haven’t signed up, the real answer is likely that it’s way more valuable for Republicans to play victims and to pretend that “big tech is censoring us!” as a messaging strategy, than to actually be part of the whitelist program. Republican officials make some excuses as to why they haven’t signed up, arguing that the program doesn’t do enough, but what Republicans really seem to want are big Fox News headlines whining about how censored they are by Google, rather than to actually use this program, which would only prove that it’s not Google that’s the problem, but their own email techniques and practices.

Of course, as the Verge piece also notes, Fox News story reveals that the GOP is just… bad at handling email:

In that same story, the RNC also confirmed that it only updated its message “segmentation to factor in recency of click, petition signature, and donation” last month. Email segmentation is standard for both political and commercial email programs, taking into account how often a recipient engages with messages before sending the email to them at all. (The RNC did not respond to requests for comment to clarify its email segmentation practices.)

“It’s absolutely standard practice and has been for over a decade to suppress what we call the ‘inactive people.’ Maybe they haven’t actually gotten around to unsubscribing, but they’re not really interested anymore,” Will Bunnett, principal at the digital firm Clarify Agency, said, describing the practice. “If the RNC just started doing that, they’re well over a decade behind.”

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: google

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “After All That Nonsense… Republicans Aren’t Even Using The Spam Backdoor They Forced Google To Create”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
39 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

I’d say it’s like the dog that caught the car but that would be insulting to dogs everywhere.

Perhaps part of the problem is that Google made it clear that it would remove any participant if more than 5% of their whitelisted emails were then flagged as spam, and GOP candidates and their spamming partners know there’s no way they can keep their emails so unspammy that they won’t all be designated as spam anyway.

That I suspect is the real sticking point, in that if they sign up for the program they’d quickly be disqualified and it will be ever slightly harder to claim that it’s Google blocking their messages when Google can just turn around and show the numbers about how no-one wants their emails.

No, much easier to keep crying about how persecuted they are and how tech companies have it out for them than to risk providing the evidence that to the extent tech companies might not want them around it’s because their users don’t want them around.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Considering that we’ve seen numerous mass reporting campaigns by liberals, they would simply need to orchestrate a campaign whereby leftists would sign up and then spam report. If they could exceed 5%, then they get a campaign censored. We see this all the time on techdirt, so it would certainly be coordinated for google. Very smart of the Republicans not to take the bait.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

no way they can keep their emails so unspammy that they won’t all be designated as spam anyway. […] Google can just turn around and show the numbers about how no-one wants their emails.

This raises the question of how these politicians got the email addresses. If nobody wants the mail, then, presumably, nobody signed up for it either. In which case it looks “spammy” because it is, in fact, spam.

Tanner Andrews (profile) says:

Re: Re: Not Much of a Mystrery

This raises the question of how these politicians got the email addresses.

I frequently get e-mails from MicroSoft offering to sell me spam lists, qualified spam lists, spam lists of people in particular businesses, and the like. I presume that I am not alone, because MicroSoft would not be sending these offers only to one person whose reflexive response is to send them to spamcop.

It seems likely that the Republican committees also receive such solicitations from MicroSoft. Perhaps their response is not the same as mine.

Tanner Andrews (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Not Much of a Mystrery

Are you sure the mails are actually from MS

Well, now that you mention it, yes, I am quite sure that the e-mails are from MicroSoft. I can tell because I examine the headers, and they show me the IP addresses of the spam servers connecting to my mail server.

Given the IP addresses, I can confirm that they are MicroSoft using a high-tech command-line tool called ``whois”. I have done that. There are also some DNS verification tricks which might be too complicated to to explain here, but which also assure me that the e-mails are from MicroSoft.

Spamcop also verifies that the e-mails are from MicroSoft servers.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

The joke is that the place is called “Sneed’s Feed & Seed” which is clever in itself and quite funny to those with a mature sense of humour but what’s really just hilarious about it is that if you look closely at the front of this store, Sneed’s Feed & Seed, you can see a line that reads “Formerly Chuck’s”. Now, this might go over the average viewer’s head as this, THIS, is peak comedy. I doubt anything will ever be as funny as the joke about Sneed’s Feed & Seed. Are you ready for this one? So, like I said, the place is called “Sneed’s Feed & Seed” and this sign says “Formerly Chuck’s”, which means that when Chuck owned the place, well, I don’t have to tell you…

The sign is a subtle joke. The shop is called “Sneed’s Feed & Seed”, where “feed” and “seed” both end in the sound “-eed”, thus rhyming with the name of the owner, Sneed. The sign says that the shop was “Formerly Chuck’s”, implying that the two words beginning with “F” and “S” would have ended with “-uck”, rhyming with “Chuck”. So, when Chuck owned the shop, it would have been called “Chuck’s Feeduck and Seeduck”.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

sneed

The joke is that the place is called “Sneed’s Feed & Seed” which is clever in itself and quite funny to those with a mature sense of humour but what’s really just hilarious about it is that if you look closely at the front of this store, Sneed’s Feed & Seed, you can see a line that reads “Formerly Chuck’s”. Now, this might go over the average viewer’s head as this, THIS, is peak comedy. I doubt anything will ever be as funny as the joke about Sneed’s Feed & Seed. Are you ready for this one? So, like I said, the place is called “Sneed’s Feed & Seed” and this sign says “Formerly Chuck’s”, which means that when Chuck owned the place, well, I don’t have to tell you…

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Thad (profile) says:

While the Verge article presents various theories as to why the Republicans haven’t signed up, the real answer is likely that it’s way more valuable for Republicans to play victims and to pretend that “big tech is censoring us!” as a messaging strategy, than to actually be part of the whitelist program.

I mean, yeah. For the same reason Greg Abbott doesn’t actually care that his Martha’s Vineyard stunt has actually made those asylum-seekers eligible for a visa they otherwise wouldn’t have been. They’re not doing these publicity stunts because of their practical outcomes, they’re doing them because they’re publicity stunts.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

And specifically because they’re not interested in doing anything. They want to enrage their supporters to make sure they get re-elected and the only real legislation or policy or program they want to progress is money stuff like tax cuts for their donors.

Tanner Andrews (profile) says:

Re: Right Circus, Wrong Clown

same reason Greg Abbott doesn’t actually care that his Martha’s Vineyard stunt

Actually, it was Ron DeSantis, using money intended to benefit Florida taxpayers.

He is running for re-election this year, and using state money for campaign stunts is certainly easier than raising his own funds. Sad to say I will have to vote for his opponent, “Chain-Gang Charlie”,.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re:

OK. What does that have to do with the asylum seekers who were following legal procedures who were caught up in the stunt? Who, it seems, are now being given a fast track to continue legal immigration after the court dates they got by following the rules were jeopardised.

Bonus: it seems that De Santis’s crew hired an illegal immigrant to carry out the stunt: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article267445097.html

Meanwhile the main idea I have to question is that if illegal immigration is so much of a problem in Florida, why De Santis had to target people in Texas for his stunt. I mean, I know the real reason is to fool xenophobic idiots, but surely even you would click at some point why this makes no sense.

I do agree with you on one point, though – people fleeing actual oppression would be better off dealing with people with some compassion and familiarity with the real world. The misdemeanor crime of crossing a border is far less problematic than the felonies a lot of “real Americans” seem to be committing on a regular basis, which apparently includes the people they want to vote for.

LostInLoDOS (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

What does that have to do with the asylum seekers who were following legal procedures who were caught up in the stunt?

What people following illegal procedures were “caught” in the act of sending illegal criminal trespassers to cities that claim to accept and protect criminal trespassers? Never showed up in the NYT daily news feed.

fast track

So maybe one or two mistake was made? And they are being properly accommodated for the error?

why De Santis had to target people in Texa

Let’s see, where are are large mega groups in the thousands of illegal trespassers crossing, a state on the Mexican border, or one with no foreign border at all. Stopping them at the source takes far less effort than finding them 3 states away and fully dispersed into the public.

Ask yourself, are you more upset because the loud mouth hypocrites got called on their claims, to prove their claims… or because criminals were moved in the first place.
Because what this series of events has shown is that only one claimed sanctuary of so many has any intention of following through completely.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 The quote and a link for full context:

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time.

— Frank Wilhoit

(Source)

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...