Appeals Court Says Nope To Florida Governor’s ‘Stop Woke’ Law, Denies Request To Lift Injunction Against It

from the stop-act-stopped dept

Playing to a crowd no one should desire to associate with, Donald Trump understudy Ron DeSantis has been saddling his constituents with a variety of noisy, performative legislation.

First, he tried to bypass the First Amendment and Section 230 immunity by hustling through a law aimed at preventing private companies from booting his buddies off their services for being the sorts of assholes they often tend to be.

As a chaser, DeSantis and his supporters in the legislature passed another law, the horribly titled “Stop WOKE Act” (since renamed the “Individual Freedom Act”). This was another attack on First Amendment rights, aimed at silencing any speech DeSantis and those like him find unpleasant.

Neither of these attempts to legislate away enshrined protections has made much headway. A federal court blocked the social media law back in June 2021. Another federal court did the same thing to the Stop WOKE Act in November of last year. This was actually the third blocking of the same law in response to multiple constitutional challenges filed by those affected by the ridiculous law.

If you’re an American lawmaker, you generally don’t want courts to immediately compare your legislative acts to George Orwell’s most famous work of dystopian fiction, “1984.” But that’s what happened here:

“It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen,” and the powers in charge of Florida’s public university system have declared the State has unfettered authority to muzzle its professors in the name of “freedom.” To confront certain viewpoints that offend the powers that be, the State of Florida passed the so-called “Stop W.O.K.E.” Act in 2022—redubbed (in line with the State’s doublespeak) the “Individual Freedom Act.” The law officially bans professors from expressing disfavored viewpoints in university classrooms while permitting unfettered expression of the opposite viewpoints. Defendants argue that, under this Act, professors enjoy “academic freedom” so long as they express only those viewpoints of which the State approves. This is positively dystopian.

That was the opening paragraph of the November decision. This is from the conclusion of the ruling that made it absolutely clear there was no way this law would ever be considered constitutional.

In this case, the State of Florida lays the cornerstone of its own Ministry of Truth under the guise of the Individual Freedom Act, declaring which viewpoints shall be orthodox and which shall be verboten in its university classrooms.

An injunction was granted, preventing the state from enforcing the clearly illegal law. The state has appealed this ruling and has asked the Eleventh Circuit to stay the injunction until it gets around to handling the case. No thanks, says the Appeals Court, in a two sentence order [PDF] denying the request. The second sentence is the more enjoyable of the two:

The Clerk is DIRECTED to treat any motion for reconsideration of this order as a non-emergency matter.

DeSantis won’t get to push his way to the front of the line or emphatically hassle the Appeals Court into getting around to his case until it’s ready to. And while he waits, he’ll remain unable to punish people for saying things he doesn’t like.

Hope springs eternal at the governor’s mansion, however. Here’s a small taste of that self-delusion, as provided by Politico.

“The Court did not rule on the merits of our appeal,” Bryan Griffin, press secretary for DeSantis, said in a statement. “The appeal is ongoing, and we remain confident that the law is constitutional.”

That’s not confidence. That’s bravado. Entirely different things. No court will find this law constitutional. May as well stop blowing taxpayer money on this losing cause. Better yet, stop blowing money on any other losing causes you think might be able to finally allow the state to directly regulate speech it doesn’t like.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Appeals Court Says Nope To Florida Governor’s ‘Stop Woke’ Law, Denies Request To Lift Injunction Against It”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
22 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
PaulT (profile) says:

“Stop Woke”

I mean, it would be nice for them to define it before they tried to stop it. I probably wouldn’t agree that it needed to be stopped, but at least there would be a common ground to debate upon as adults should be wont to do…

They won’t because it seems that it means anything from “pretending that college level CRT courses are aimed at elementary students”, “pretending that drag = sex” to “not having sexy enough M&Ms”, but it would be nice if the words being debated could be defined.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

You’re expecting the legislature and, perhaps, even the governor, to act like adults. If they have to clearly define the words, then that takes all the fun out of the entire effort. It also requires some serious work, and these aren’t serious people. They only get to play this game because we’ve dumbed down so many people who fail to understand that the only people that the Republican party intends to help are the ultrawealthy.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re:

“You’re expecting the legislature and, perhaps, even the governor, to act like adults”

I admit a flaw of mine was expecting other people to mentally progress past puberty as I aged.

“They only get to play this game because we’ve dumbed down so many people who fail to understand that the only people that the Republican party intends to help are the ultrawealthy.”

But, some of it isn’t simply stupidity. Some is being convinced that (irrelevant social issue) is more important than (actually important political issue). Some is is generating apathy where actual voter engagement would kick these people out (witness popular vote not resulting in a Republican president in the last few decades).

It’s not about people being “dumb”, it’s about being engaged and believing that their vote actually makes a difference. Which I hope happens in 2024…

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re:

It’s just standard propaganda in reality – a word that has positive meanings being redefined by fascists so that their followers won’t actually start agreeing with the concepts behind them. It’s just funny to see “woke” go so quickly from “being aware of systemic injustice and how they affect populations without conscious prejudice from the actors involved” to “I don’t like seeing black people in movies” and “my potato doesn’t have the right gender” with zero irony and it would be amusing for them to try and explain that.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

In the wake of the nationally legislated speed limit of 55 MPH (enforced by “do it, or we’ll take some of your transportation funds”), Montana created a fine for “wasting natural resources” in the empty rural areas of the state.

I daydream about someone suing the Florida governor’s office, legislature, and attorney general for “wasting state tax monies on creating and defending clearly unconstitutional laws”. Probably forbidden by qualified or absolute immunity, but I can dream, can’t I?

Paul B says:

Re:

So, oddly You have to get past “Absolute Immunity” to go after the Governor or Legislature. This means you have to not only show they are acting in bad faith (like with Disney). But the standard is malice or corrupt motives.

Now malice might get you someplace, your going to have to show that not only are they wasting tax payer money, but doing so with the goal to hurt people. Downside is you need to get them to say the quiet part out loud somehow otherwise they will just claim some other reason for that law and play dumb.

What’s interesting is the Republican party has been saying the quiet part out loud, for example with the Disney case they came out and said they passed the law with the intent to hurt Disney. (Then backtracked).

So if they (The governor and legislator) actully admit the reason for “Stop Woke”, its face value unconstitutional, the courts agree with this statement, that does open them up to direct legal actions from the targets of the bill.

Downside, I am fairly sure you can only sue today for damages or to ask the court to prevent the legislator from doing something. Which more or less is not enforceable.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

No-one hates the first amendment like US conservatives

Florida: What are you talking about, we’re huge fans of free speech and the first amendment, anyone in the state is absolutely free to say anything they want so long as it’s on the list of approved speech.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Tanner Andrews (profile) says:

definition

it would be nice for them to define it before they tried to stop it

During the trial on his removal of the state atty from Hillsborough, DeSantis’ general counsel defined it for the court: the term means “the belief there are systemic injustices in American society and the need to address them.”

Hope that helps.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: 'Admitting injustices exist and wanting to fix them', how terrible

So, not being in an emotional support reality(credit to Stephen for that name, it’s just so perfect) and instead being aware that problems exist in the real one while wanting to do something about said problems?

I can see why they’d be so hesitant to define the word if that’s the usage as that’s one of those accusations that tells you more about the one making it than the person it’s aimed at.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
15:42 Supreme Court Shrugs Off Opportunity To Overturn Fifth Circuit's Batshit Support Of Texas Drag Show Ban (62)
15:31 Hong Kong's Zero-Opposition Legislature Aims To Up Oppression With New 'National Security' Law (33)
09:30 5th Circuit Is Gonna 5th Circus: Declares Age Verification Perfectly Fine Under The First Amendment (95)
13:35 Missouri’s New Speech Police (67)
15:40 Florida Legislator Files Bill That Would Keep Killer Cops From Being Named And Shamed (38)
10:49 Fifth Circuit: Upon Further Review, Fuck The First Amendment (39)
13:35 City Of Los Angeles Files Another Lawsuit Against Recipient Of Cop Photos The LAPD Accidentally Released (5)
09:30 Sorry Appin, We’re Not Taking Down Our Article About Your Attempts To Silence Reporters (41)
10:47 After Inexplicably Allowing Unconstitutional Book Ban To Stay Alive For Six Months, The Fifth Circuit Finally Shuts It Down (23)
15:39 Judge Reminds Deputies They Can't Arrest Someone Just Because They Don't Like What Is Being Said (33)
13:24 Trump Has To Pay $392k For His NY Times SLAPP Suit (16)
10:43 Oklahoma Senator Thinks Journalists Need Licenses, Should Be Trained By PragerU (88)
11:05 Appeals Court: Ban On Religious Ads Is Unconstitutional Because It's Pretty Much Impossible To Define 'Religion' (35)
10:49 Colorado Journalist Says Fuck Prior Restraint, Dares Court To Keep Violating The 1st Amendment (35)
09:33 Free Speech Experts Realizing Just How Big A Free Speech Hypocrite Elon Is (55)
15:33 No Love For The Haters: Illinois Bans Book Bans (But Not Really) (38)
10:44 Because The Fifth Circuit Again Did Something Ridiculous, The Copia Institute Filed Yet Another Amicus Brief At SCOTUS (11)
12:59 Millions Of People Are Blocked By Pornhub Because Of Age Verification Laws (78)
10:59 Federal Court Says First Amendment Protects Engineers Who Offer Expert Testimony Without A License (17)
12:58 Sending Cops To Search Classrooms For Controversial Books Is Just Something We Do Now, I Guess (221)
09:31 Utah Finally Sued Over Its Obviously Unconstitutional Social Media ‘But Think Of The Kids!’ Law (47)
12:09 The EU’s Investigation Of ExTwitter Is Ridiculous & Censorial (37)
09:25 Media Matters Sues Texas AG Ken Paxton To Stop His Bogus, Censorial ‘Investigation’ (44)
09:25 Missouri AG Announces Bullshit Censorial Investigation Into Media Matters Over Its Speech (108)
09:27 Supporting Free Speech Means Supporting Victims Of SLAPP Suits, Even If You Disagree With The Speakers (74)
15:19 State Of Iowa Sued By Pretty Much Everyone After Codifying Hatred With A LGBTQ-Targeting Book Ban (157)
13:54 Retiree Arrested For Criticizing Local Officials Will Have Her Case Heard By The Supreme Court (9)
12:04 Judge Says Montana’s TikTok Ban Is Obviously Unconstitutional (4)
09:27 Congrats To Elon Musk: I Didn’t Think You Had It In You To File A Lawsuit This Stupid. But, You Crazy Bastard, You Did It! (151)
12:18 If You Kill Two People In A Car Crash, You Shouldn’t Then Sue Their Relatives For Emailing Your University About What You Did (47)
More arrow